Assessment of Efficacy of KAN-JANG® in Mild COVID-19

September 21, 2021 updated by: Swedish Herbal Institute AB

Effect of Kan-Jang® Supplementation in Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: A Randomized, Quadruple-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

The complexity of COVID-19 suggests a potential need for a range of therapies, including antiviral agents, immunostimulants, immunosuppressants, adaptogens, and anticoagulants. In this context, implementation of polyvalency drugs, which exhibit a wide range of biological activities and multitarget effects that is common for herbal medicines and specifically for Kan Jang, the fixed combination of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Wall. ex. Nees and Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim which are known to exhibit antiviral, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects and clinical efficacy in the respiratory tract of patients with infectious diseases. The purpose of this study is to provide scientific evidence on the effectiveness of Kan Jang for the treatment of mild COVID-19. We hypothesize that Kan Jang will have superior efficacy in amelioration COVID symptoms compared to placebo with a comparable safety profile to placebo. We hypothesize that Kan Jang will increase patients' recovery rate and decrease the duration of illness.

The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant treatment with Kan Jang for alleviating the severity of inflammatory symptoms (headache, loss of smell, gustatory dysfunction, rhinorrhea, nasal congestions, cough, sore throat, asthenia, myalgia, and fever) and shortening of their duration in mild COVID-19 patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Rationale. Pathogenesis and progression of COVID-19 is a multistep process, which requires correct therapeutic strategy on various steps of initiation of overall defense response to pathogen and its resolution. Consequently, effective treatment of COVID-19 requires pharmaceutical corrections of many components innate, adaptive immune system, phases I-III metabolizing enzymes of detoxifying and repairing systems, and the SARS-Cov-2 virus' life cycle and proliferation.

It can be achieved by multitarget pharmaceutical intervention of herbal preparations with polyvalent and pleiotropic actions on host defense systems, e.g., adaptogens Andrographis paniculata L. (Burm. F.) Wall. ex. Nees and Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim, known as natural stress-protective plant extracts that increase adaptability, resilience, and survival of organisms.

A growing body of evidence suggests that extracts of Andrographis paniculata L. (SHA-10) and Eleutherococcus senticosus (SHE-3) are effective and well-tolerated medications for preventing and treating acute viral respiratory infections. WHO recognizes the use of Andrographis paniculata in the symptomatic treatment of upper respiratory infections, bronchitis, and pharyngotonsillitis. Recently, Thailand's health ministry approved using an Herba Andrographidis extract to treat the early stages of Covid-19 as a pilot program amid a flareup in the coronavirus outbreak in Thailand.

The fixed combination of these plants' extracts, the herbal medicinal product Kan Jang®, has been used in Scandinavia for treating symptoms of viral respiratory diseases, such as common colds and influenza, for >30 years. The clinical evidence accumulated indicates that Kan Jang has strong and, in many cases, significant effects on various common cold symptoms. In general, significant improvements were observed in nasal symptoms (e.g., secretion (g/day) frequency, and congestion, throat symptoms (soreness), respiratory problems (incl. cough, frequency of cough), headache, general malaise, fatigue, earache, sleep disturbance, and the objective parameter body temperature and decreased overall total symptoms scores in 5 days of treatment. Furthermore, Kan Jang® sped up patients' recovery and reduced post-influenza complications during the influenza viruses A1 and A3 periods in 1999 and 2000.

Both A. paniculata and E. senticosus and their fixed combination, Kan Jang®, exhibit antiviral, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects. Kan Jang® is significantly more effective than the two active ingredients A. paniculata, and E. senticosus extracts alone, presumably due to synergistic interactions in molecular networks deregulated by Kan Jang. A recent study direct antiviral activity of Andrographis, Eleutherococcus, and their combination Kan Jang®, against coronavirus, has been demonstrated: Kan Jang significantly inhibits coronavirus growth in isolated human cells. The antiviral activity of the combinations of Andrographis and Eleutherococcus is more significant than expected. Further studies in COVID-19 patients are warranted to verify whether this observation of the direct antiviral activity of Kan Jang® has clinical significance.

Assessment of primary and secondary endpoints

Treatment benefits will be evaluated by assessment of clinical outcomes, including clinician-reported outcome; observer-reported outcome; performance patient-reported outcomes and biomarkers

Treatment benefits will be evaluated by assessing clinician-, observer- and patient-reported outcomes, including performance outcomes and biomarkers.

Efficacy primary and secondary endpoints will be obtained by intergroup comparison of clinical outcomes changes from baseline during the treatment and follow-up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization) in Kan Jang control groups.

A description of the statistical methods to be employed, including the timing of any planned interim analysis (es).

Clinical data at each visit will be recorded using a standardized clinician assessment form and a set of patient rating scales. The data will be entered into an Excel database used as input to statistical software GraphPad (San Diego, CA, USA) Prism software (version 6.03 for Windows), which will be the primary software used for data development and analysis.

Statistical analysis will involve evaluating the patient's change in scores on the test scale from the initial visit (baseline) to intermediate and the final visit and at each scheduled visit of the study. Analysis of changes within treatment groups during the study (Visits 1,2,3 and 4) will be performed by:

  • One-way, repeated measures ANOVA (variables with normal distribution),
  • Friedman test for repeated several measures (nonparametric data), Results will be calculated using parametric or non-parametric statistical methods depending on the nature of data and applied on intention to treat and per-protocol study groups.

We will evaluate two main questions.

Question 1: was randomization successful, and are groups equal at the beginning of the study?

To assess whether the treatment groups are similar at baseline, we will compare the mean values at baseline for subjects who receive Kan Jang vs. placebo by the Student's parametric independent-measures t-test (variables with normal distribution) or Mann-Whitney non-parametric test, depending on results of normality test.

Question 2: is the effect of Kan Jang treatment superior to the Placebo effect?

Assessment of the efficacy of study medications will be achieved by comparison of mean changes from the baseline (differences before and after treatment of every single patient) between groups using two-way between-within ANOVA in which an interaction effect indicates a different response over time between the two groups and would therefore signal a treatment effect, as well as by multiple comparison t-test (one unpaired test per row),

The primary endpoint is defined as the Duration of the Symptoms. Kaplan-Meier curves will be generated for all endpoints, and medians will be calculated from those curves. The treatment arms will be compared by Mantel-Cox log-rank and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon tests. we will calculate the estimates of treatment hazard ratios based on log-rank tests and 95% CIs.

Intergroup comparison of the number of patients with particular symptoms will be assessed using the odds ratio (OR) statistics of endpoints according to Altman; A/B test of significance of differences of endpoints at 95% confidence, and z-statistic at 95% confidence of statistical significance (Figure 3 b and Supplement 2) (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php)

The effect size of the individual and overall symptoms will be calculated as the difference between the effects of Kan Jang and placebo. We will evaluate an overall relative estimate of overall effect size (%) between two treatment groups as.

Effect size (%) = KJ™ - Placebo / KJ™ X 100

We will use a statistical significance level of 5% in the Protocol approved by the health authorities.

We will perform statistical analysis on an intent-to-treat basis.

Safety Analyses

Descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables, and frequencies and percent for categorical variables) will be used to summarize safety measures, which include adverse experiences, physical examination, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests, etc.

The incidence of adverse events will be compared across treatment groups for descriptive purposes and to identify possible differences in the safety profiles using the odds ratio (OR) statistics of endpoints according to Altman; A/B test of significance of differences of endpoints at 95% confidence; and z-statistic methods for categorical data https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

140

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Alexander Panossian, PhD
  • Phone Number: +46733306226
  • Email: ap@phytomed.se

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0141
        • Recruiting
        • The First University Clinic of Tbilisi State Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Laboratory confirmed (SARS-Cov-2 PCR-positive test) mild COVID-19 infection (in the last three days),
  • COVID-19 patient in stable, moderate condition (i.e., not requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission).
  • Subjects must be under observation or admitted to a controlled facility or hospital (home quarantine is not sufficient).
  • Able to take medication alone
  • Able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pulmonary diseases
  • Chronic pulmonary diseases
  • Chronic rhinosinusitis
  • Patient admitted already under invasive mechanical ventilation;
  • The patient admitted with the severe acute respiratory syndrome and diagnosed with an etiologic agent other than Covid 19;
  • Renal failure requiring dialysis or creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dl;
  • Tube feeding or parenteral nutrition.
  • Respiratory decompensation requiring mechanical ventilation.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes type 2.
  • Hypertension stage 3,
  • Autoimmune disease.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients are taking antibiotics for a reason other than COVID-19 at enrollment.
  • Has a chronically weakened immune system (AIDS, lymphoma, chemo-radio- corticosteroid therapy, immunosuppressive pathology);
  • Patients treated with chemo-radio-corticosteroid therapy in the last six months.
  • Patients with active cancer.
  • Taking immunosuppressive drugs (e.g., anti-rejection treatment after organ transplant);
  • Already participating in another clinical trial;
  • Has any other condition that would prevent safe participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Kan Jang
70 patients take Kan Jang, two capsules three times a day for the two weeks in the treatment period. Daily dose - 90-120 mg of andrographolides.

One capsule contains a fixed combination of proprietary

  • Andrographis paniculata Nees. herb, native extract, DER native 4,5-8,0 :1 260 mg (Diterpene lactones andrographolide and 14-deoxy, 11,12- didehydroadnrograholide) 15-20 mg
  • Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim) Harms, root, native extract DER native 17-30:1 : 11.4 mg and other inactive excipients (Polycristalline cellulose, Magnesium stearate).
Other Names:
  • Kan Jang fixed combination
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
70 patients take Placebo, two capsules three times a day for the two weeks in the treatment period
Inactive excipients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of symptoms of mild COVID-19: number of days before symptoms disappear
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Time (days) from randomization to symptoms disappear
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
The severity of the COVID-19 total and individual symptoms: headache, loss of smell, gustatory dysfunction, rhinorrhoea, nasal congestions, cough, sore throat, asthenia, myalgia, and fever
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (trough 21 days after randomization)
Time (days) from randomization to the relief of total and individual mild COVID symptoms scores.
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (trough 21 days after randomization)
Duration of infection
Time Frame: from Day 1 to Day 14 after randomisation
Time (days) from randomization to negative SARS-Cov-2 PCR test
from Day 1 to Day 14 after randomisation
Number of participants clinically recovered
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Number of participants (n) without symptoms of mild COVID
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Respiratory symptoms and quality of life scores
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey Questionary Score
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Cognitive performance test
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
d2-test of attention score
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Immune response marker
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
IL-6 concentration in the serum, pg/ml.
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Hypercoagulation marker
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization
Dimer-D, ng/ml
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization
Inflammatory marker
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
C-reactive protein, mg/L
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Physical activity
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
Assessed by Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire Score
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paracetamol intake
Time Frame: Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)
The number (n) of daily doses (4g) of paracetamol consumed during 14 days from randomization.
Change from baseline during the period of the treatment and follow up (from Day 1 to Day 14 and day 21 after randomization)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Levan Ratiani, PhD, MD, The First University Clinic of Tbilisi State Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHIRD-2021-02
  • Nr3-2021/87 (Registry Identifier: Registry Identifier: Biomedical Research Ethics Committee)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Kan Jang capsules

3
Subscribe