No Operation After Short Course Radiotherapy Followed By Consolidation Chemotherapy In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (NOAHS-ARC)

No Operation After Short Course Equivalent Dose (Ht) Radiation Therapy Followed By Consolidation Chemotherapy In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: The Prospective, Single Arm NOAHS-ARC Trial

This study is designed to explore the hypothesis that in patients with a Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with a Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategy based on short course radiotherapy (5x5Gy) followed by neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy is associated with a higher rate of pathological clinical response and sustained (>1year) complete clinical response when compared to an historical cohort treated with long course chemoradiation therapy (CRT), total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non-operative management with a Watch and Wait (W&W) strategy has been advocated for selected patients with a locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and a complete clinical response (cCR) after neoajuvant (NA) treatment.

In this context, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), i.e the use of radiotherapy and full dose of post-operative chemotherapy as part of NA treatment, has emerged as a strategy to enhance treatment response.

Currently, TNT has reported higher rates of pCR and organ preservation when compared to current standard of care. However, the best TNT strategy is still unknown. We therefore hypothesize that in LARC patients, the use of a TNT strategy based on short course RT followed by consolidation chemotherapy is associated with a higher rate of pCR and sustained (>1year) cCR when compared to an historic cohort.

The main aim of the present proposal is to assess the effects of a standardized TNT model in LARC patients as a strategy for enhanced pCR/sustained cCR. For this purpose, we propose the following experimental model: In primary Aim 1 we will study if the effects of a TNT strategy over patients with a LARC enhance the rate of pCR/sustained cCR by (1) evaluating the compliance and toxicity of a TNT strategy as a proof of concept of its applicability, (2) assessing the rate of cCR at the end of TNT and (3) assessing the rate of pCR in the surgically managed subgroup and sustained cCR (>1year) in the W&W subgroup. Additionally, in primary Aim 2, we will determine if patients with a W&W strategy have better functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) than patients treated with TME after TNT by (1) using validated questionnaires for the evaluation of bowel, sexual and urinary function for W&W and TME patients and (2) by evaluating the QoL using a widely-used standardized questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RM
      • Santiago, RM, Chile
        • Complejo Asistencial Doctor Sótero del Rio
      • Santiago, RM, Chile
        • Hospital La Florida
      • Santiago, RM, Chile
        • Hospital Padre Hurtado

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum
  • Clinical Stage II (T3-4, N-) or Stage III (any T, N+) based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Tumors < 7cm from anal verge (palpable)
  • No prior history of rectal cancer

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with tumors >7cm from anal verge
  • ECOG >1,
  • Contraindication for chemotherapy: Hemoglobin <8, White Blood Count <4000, Platelets <100,000, Creatinine Clearance <50ml/min, Total Bilirubin <5mg/dl,
  • Stage IV at diagnosis
  • Coronary artery disease, either no treated or recent acute coronary syndrome in the last 12 months.
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • Prior rectal cancer treatment
  • Pregnancy or nursery
  • Any contraindications to MRI (e.g. patients with pacemakers)
  • Indication of pelvic exenteration
  • Impossibility to consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short Course Radiotherapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy
This arm will receive short course radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) during 1 week. Between 7 to 14 days after radiotherapy, patient will receive 9 cycles of FOLFOX. CapeOX may be given as alternative for FOLFOX.
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • All Brands
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • All Brands
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • All Brands
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • All Brands
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy
Quality of Life Evaluation (LARS Score, IIEF, FSFI, I-PSS and EORTC QLQ-C30)
Flexible Sigmoidoscopy and Digital Rectal Exam

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of pathological and sustained clinical response
Time Frame: 3 years
Combined number of patients with pathological response in the surgical specimen and patients in a Watch and Wait protocol with a sustained clinical response longer than a year.
3 years
Quality of Life and Funcional Outcomes
Time Frame: 3 years
Standardized evaluation using validated questionnaires comparing patients undergoing TME versus WW patients in the cohort
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 3 years
Adverse events will be graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felipe F Quezada-Diaz, MD, Complejo Asistencial Doctor Sótero del Rio
  • Principal Investigator: Nicole M Caire, MD, Complejo Asistencial Doctor Sótero del Rio

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Oxaliplatin

Subscribe