- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04864158
Prosthesis Versus Active Exercise Program in Patients With Rotator Cuff Arthropathy (REACT)
Prosthesis Versus Active Exercise Program in Patients With Rotator Cuff Arthropathy Eligible For Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: the ReAct Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rotator cuff arthropathy describes the clinical scenario of massive rotator cuff ruptures associated with glenohumeral joint degeneration and superior migration of the humeral head. Clinical presentation includes joint effusion, pain, and loss of mobility. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a well-established treatment for rotator cuff arthropathy. Several studies have suggested the need for trials comparing shoulder arthroplasty to non-surgical treatments.
The ProAct trial is a Nordic multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, eligible for a RSA will be randomised to either RSA followed by usual care or exercise only. The exercise intervention consists of 12 weeks of exercise with one weekly physiotherapist-supervised exercise session.
The primary outcome will be the total the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index score at 12 months follow-up. Outcome assessment will be performed at baseline, and at 3 and 12 months and 2-, 5- and 10 years after start of surgical/non-surgical treatment.
Patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria but declining to participate in the randomised trial will be offered the option of participating in an observational cohort using the same primary end point and patient reported outcomes, but following usual clinical practice.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Josefine B. Larsen, MSc
- Phone Number: 4526237771
- Email: josefinebl@clin.au.dk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Inger Mechlenburg, Prof.
- Phone Number: 4521679062
- Email: inger.mechlenburg@clin.au.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
- Recruiting
- Aarhus University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Josefine Larsen, Msc
- Email: josefinebl@clin.au.dk
-
Contact:
- Inger Mechlenburg, Prof.
- Email: inger.mechlenburg@clin.au.dk
-
Contact:
- Theis M. Thillemann, PhD, As Prof
-
Esbjerg, Denmark, 6700
- Recruiting
- Esbjerg Hospital
-
Contact:
- Klaus Hanisch
-
Farsø, Denmark, 9640
- Recruiting
- Aalborg University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Steen L Jensen
-
Silkeborg, Denmark, 8600
- Recruiting
- Silkeborg Regional Hospital
-
Contact:
- Brian Elmegaard
-
Contact:
- Stine J Due
-
Viborg, Denmark, 8800
- Recruiting
- Viborg Regional Hospital
-
Contact:
- Helle K Østergaard
-
Contact:
- Srdjan Zivanovic
-
-
-
-
-
Tartu, Estonia
- Recruiting
- Tartu University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Kaspar Tootsi
-
-
-
-
-
Tampere, Finland, 33521
- Recruiting
- Tampere University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Antti P. Launonen, PhD, As Prof
- Email: antti.launonen@pshp.fi
-
-
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 4956
- Recruiting
- Oslo University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Berte Bøe
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients 60-85 years
- Eligible for RSA
- Rotator cuff arthropathy according to Hamada grade 3, 4 and 5 (33)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous shoulder fracture (fracture of the proximal humerus or glenoid fracture)
- Planned other upper extremity surgery within six months
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other types of arthritis not diagnosed as primary glenohumeral OA
- Cancer diagnosis and receiving chemo-, immuno- or radiotherapy
- Neurological diseases affecting shoulder mobility (e.g. disability after previous stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's disease)
- Other reasons for exclusion (i.e. mentally unable to participate) or planned absence for more than 14 days in the first 3 months after baseline test.
- Unable to communicate in the participating countries respective languages
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: RSA-group
Surgery
|
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty followed by standard rehabilitation.
|
|
Experimental: Exercise-group
Exercise
|
The exercise-group will attend a 12-week exercise program with one weekly physiotherapist-supervised session supplemented with two weekly sessions of home-based exercises.
Utilisation of a predefined training protocol describing procedures and content of each session secure uniformity and standardisation of the intervention.
The exercise program consists of two warm-up exercises and five exercises that target shoulder range of motion and muscle strength.
Furthermore, a link to a video, informing about glenohumeral osteoarthritis, the role of exercise and exercise related pain, will be sent to all patients in the exercise-group.
The physiotherapists delivering the exercise intervention are not otherwise related to the trial.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS)
Time Frame: Measured at 12 month follow-up
|
WOOS consist of 19 items to be answered using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Each item has a possible score ranging from 0 to 100, leading to a total WOOS score ranging from 0 to 1900, with 0 being the best.
For simplicity reasons, raw scores can be converted to a percentage of the maximum score (0-100, 100 best).
|
Measured at 12 month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
WOOS consist of 19 items to be answered using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Each item has a possible score ranging from 0 to 100, leading to a total WOOS score ranging from 0 to 1900, with 0 being the best.
For simplicity reasons, raw scores can be converted to a percentage of the maximum score (0-100, 100 best).
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
DASH is a self-administered questionnaire that consist of thirty core items and eight items assessing work and sports and/or performing arts activities.
Each individual item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, and lower scores correlated to minimal impairments and higher scores indicate more impairment.
The cumulative DASH score is scaled from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more disability
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
|
The change in pain measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
Patient reported pain intensity at rest, during activity and nightly pain.
With a possible score ranging from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the worst possible pain
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
|
The use of analgesics during the last week
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
The patients will be asked if they take any analgesics (yes/no)
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
|
The type of analgesics consumed during the last week
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
The patients will be asked which type of analgesics they take (paracetamol, NSAID, morphine/opioids).
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
|
Consumption of analgesics during the last week
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
The patients will be asked how often they consume the analgesic medication (never, daily, weekly, monthly).
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up
|
|
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: The patients in the surgical intervention group will be monitored for serious adverse events during the 4 weeks from the discharge.
|
Serious adverse events are defined as embolism (cardiac or brain), death, liver and renal failure.
|
The patients in the surgical intervention group will be monitored for serious adverse events during the 4 weeks from the discharge.
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Occurring during the period from inclusion until the 12-month follow-up
|
Defined as any unintended and unfavorable sign, symptom or disease resulting in contact with the healthcare system irrespective of a causal relationship with the intervention and outcome assessments.
|
Occurring during the period from inclusion until the 12-month follow-up
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accelerometer-based activity using tri-axial (Axivity, UK) accelerometers
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and 12-month follow-up
|
The patients will have an accelerometer sensor mounted with tape to both upper arms for 4 days.
The sensors will measure 24/7 activity of the upper arms.
|
Measured at baseline and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Accelerometer-based degree of movement using tri-axial (Axivity, UK) accelerometers
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and 12-month follow-up
|
The patients will have an accelerometer sensor mounted with tape to both upper arms for 4 days.
The sensors will measure 24/7 degree of movement.
|
Measured at baseline and 12-month follow-up
|
|
The 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (exercise-group)
Time Frame: Measured immediately before and immideately after each exercise session. From the date of the start of the exercise intervention until the end of the exercise intervention, assessed up to 12 months.
|
Patient reported pain intensity at rest.
With a possible score ranging from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the worst possible pain.
|
Measured immediately before and immideately after each exercise session. From the date of the start of the exercise intervention until the end of the exercise intervention, assessed up to 12 months.
|
|
EuroQol Group 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2- 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
The EuroQol measures the five dimensions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension consists of one item, distinguished in five levels.
We will used the UK value set in this study, because a Danish value set is not yet available.
These values range from -0.285 to 1.0, a value of 1.0 corresponds to full health, 0 corresponds to death and negative values correspond to health status considered to be worse than death.
|
Measured at baseline, 12-week, 12-month, 2- 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
|
Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ)
Time Frame: Measured at 12-week and 12-month.
|
The iPCQ is a questionnaire for the measurement of costs in economic evaluations.
It consists of 18 questions of which 9 are general questions followed by questions to measure productivity losses of paid work due to 1) absenteeism and 2) presenteeism and productivity losses related to 3) unpaid work.
The minimum value is 0 (no productivity loss) and the maximum value is infinite.
Measured for the health economic evaluation in Denmark.
|
Measured at 12-week and 12-month.
|
|
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Time Frame: Measured at 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
PASS will be assessed with the following question, reported by the patient: "When you think of your shoulder function, will you consider your current condition as satisfying?
By shoulder function, you should take into account your activities of daily living, sport and recreational activities, your shoulder pain and other symptoms and your quality-of-life", measured on a dichotomous scale (yes/no).
|
Measured at 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
|
Treatment Failure
Time Frame: Measured at 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
Patient-reported treatment failure will be assessed only by patients answering "no" to PASS with the following question: "Would you consider your current state as being so unsatisfactory that you think the treatment has failed?" on a dichotomous scale (yes/no).
|
Measured at 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
|
Number of total shoulder arthroplasty surgeries (exercise-group)
Time Frame: Measured from baseline to 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
Number of total shoulder arthroplasty surgeries performed in the exercise-group.
|
Measured from baseline to 12-month, 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up.
|
|
Number of supervised exercise sessions from baseline to 3 months (exercise-group)
Time Frame: From baseline to 12-week
|
High compliance will be defined as participation in ≥70 percent of the training sessions; moderate compliance as participation in 50-70 percent of the sessions; and poor compliance as participation in <50 percent of the sessions.
|
From baseline to 12-week
|
|
Number of patients performing unsupervised exercise (exercise-group)
Time Frame: From baseline to 12-week
|
Adherence to two weekly unsupervised exercise sessions will be measured by a patient-reported questionnaire
|
From baseline to 12-week
|
|
Number of patients performing unsupervised exercise (exercise-group)
Time Frame: From 12-week to 12-month
|
Adherence to optional unsupervised exercise sessions will be measured by a patient-reported questionnaire
|
From 12-week to 12-month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Josefine B. Larsen, MSc, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
- Study Director: Inger Mechlenburg, Prof., Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
- Study Director: Theis M. Thillemann, PhD, As Prof, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University
- Study Director: Antti P. Launonen, PhD, As Prof, Tampere University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- REACT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Arthropathy
-
Texas Bone and JointINCREDIWEAR HOLDINGS, INC.Enrolling by invitationRotator Cuff Injuries | Rotator Cuff Tears | Rotator Cuff Arthropathy of Left Shoulder (Disorder) | Rotator Cuff Arthropathy of Right Shoulder (Disorder) | Rotator Cuff Arthropathy of Bilateral ShouldersUnited States
-
Hospital del MarRecruiting
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedShoulder Osteoarthritis | Cuff Tear Arthropathy | Massive Rotator Cuff TearUnited States
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedRotator Cuff ArthropathyBelgium
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans HospitalWithdrawnShoulder Osteoarthritis | Rotator Cuff Tear ArthropathyUnited States
-
Lovisenberg Diakonale HospitalSykehuset Telemark; South-Eastern Norway Regional Health AuthorityRecruitingRotator Cuff Injuries | Rotator Cuff Tears | Rotator Cuff Tear ArthropathyNorway
-
Henry Ford Health SystemSmith & Nephew, Inc.RecruitingRotator Cuff Tears | Rotator Cuff Tear ArthropathyUnited States
-
Zimmer, GmbHCompletedCuff-tear ArthropathyGermany, Belgium, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
Schulthess KlinikArthrex, Inc.Completed
-
University of IowaCompletedRotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy | Arthropathy Shoulder | Arthritis Shoulder Glenohumoral JointUnited States
Clinical Trials on TSA-group
-
University of AarhusOslo University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Aalborg University Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingGlenohumeral OsteoarthritisFinland, Denmark, Norway
-
Université de MontréalRecruitingShoulder ArthritisCanada
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedArthritis | Shoulder Pain | Inflammatory Arthritis | Shoulder Osteoarthritis | Shoulder Arthritis | Shoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions | Arthropathy Shoulder | Necrosis of BoneUnited States
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingEpendymoma | Medulloblastoma, Childhood | Embryonal Tumor With Multilayered Rosettes | Pineoblastoma | Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor of CNS | Embryonal Brain Tumor Not Otherwise SpecifiedUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneRecruiting
-
NeuroStorm, IncstoPD.orgEnrolling by invitation
-
Columbia UniversityCompleted
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUnknownDiabetes; Neuropathy, Polyneuropathy (Manifestation)
-
Stryker Trauma and ExtremitiesTerminated
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalTianjin Medical University General HospitalRecruitingNervous System Diseases | Immune System Diseases | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System | Autoimmune Diseases | Diagnostic Self Evaluation | NMO Spectrum Disorder | NMDA-R EncephalitisChina