Short-term Effectiveness of Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Acute Lumbosacral Radiculalgia by Herniation Disc (GRADE) (GRADE)

April 16, 2026 updated by: Lille Catholic University

Short-term Effectiveness of Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Acute Lumbosacral Radiculalgia by Herniation Disc: a Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study

The study consists in evaluating the analgesic efficacy of Gabapentin versus Placebo in the short term (72h) acute lumbosacral radiculalgia due to disc herniation.

In addition to the usual analgesic treatment, the patient will receive gabapentin or placebo.

During the three days of treatment, an evaluation of the pain and the tolerance will be performed within the two groups: experimental and control.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of the study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of GABAPENTIN versus Placebo in 72h for hospitalised patients suffering from acute lumbosacral radiculalgia due to disc herniation.

After signing the consent form, patient's clinical data will be collected and the patient will be allocated to one treatment arm by the randomisation process (ratio 1:1 and stratified on the strong opioid intake).

Two treatment arms are possible :

  • Experimental group: GABAPENTINE per os
  • DAY1:300 mg
  • DAY 2: 600 mg
  • DAY3 : 900 mg
  • Control group: placebo (same dosage per day as GABAPENTINE).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arras, France
        • CH Arras-rheumatology
      • Béthune, France
        • CH Béthune-rheumatology
      • Caen, France
        • CHU Caen-rheumatology
      • Dunkirk, France
        • CH Dunkerque-rheumatology
      • Rouen, France
        • CHU Rouen-rheumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years,
  • Radiculalgia or lumboradiculalgia less than 3 months (pain of a lower limb systematized to a radicular territory, possibly associated with lumbar pain),
  • Inpatient management for a minimum of 72 hours after inclusion,
  • Initial radiculalgia VAS ≥ 4 (moderate to severe pain),
  • Concordant disc herniation between clinical symptomatology and imaging (CT or MRI) less than 3 months,
  • Written consent signed by the patient,
  • Affiliation to a social security system
  • For women of childbearing age, use of effective contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Motor neurological deficit (≤ 3/5) or cauda equina syndrome (emergency surgical indications),
  • Chronic neuropathic pain in the lower limb affected by radiculalgia,
  • Lumbar infiltration performed within 72 hours prior to inclusion or unable to be performed after 72 hours,
  • Patient already on Gabapentin or Pregabalin, or having taken these treatments in the 7 days prior to inclusion
  • Contraindication to Gabapentin (Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients: corn starch, talc, yellow iron oxide, titanium dioxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, gelatin, shellac, propylene glycol, black iron oxide and potassium hydroxide)
  • Creatinine clearance < 30ml/min,
  • Hemodialysis patient,
  • Body weight < 50kgs,
  • Transplant patient
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gabapentin

GABAPENTIN per os*:

  • DAY 1:300 mg
  • DAY 2: 600 mg
  • DAY 3: 900 mg

The patient will receive in addition to the usual analgesic treatment, the treatment under study: Gabapentin.

During the first 3 days of his hospitalization, an evaluation of the pain and the tolerance to the treatment will be performed.

The patient will have to take the treatment as follows:

  • Day 1 (1st day of hospitalization): 1 capsule/day
  • Day 2: 2 capsules/day
  • Day 3: 3 capsules/day 72 hours after the first treatment, a blood test will be performed.
Other Names:
  • NEUROTIN
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

PLACEBO:

  • DAY 1:300 mg
  • DAY 2: 600 mg
  • DAY 3: 900 mg

The patient will receive in addition to the usual analgesic treatment, the Placebo During the first 3 days of his hospitalization, an evaluation of the pain and the tolerance to the treatment will be made.

The patient will have to take the treatment as follows:

  • Day 1 (1st day of hospitalization): 1 capsule/day
  • Day 2: 2 capsules/day
  • Day 3: 3 capsules/day 72 hours after the first treatment, a blood test will be performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) for radiculalgia
Time Frame: Day 4
Visual analogue scales are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain being 0 equivalent to no pain and 100 to the worst possible pain between Day 1 (first day) and Day 4, Day 1 corresponding to the first administered dose of the treatment (Gabapentin or Placebo).
Day 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of patients with at least one adverse event
Time Frame: Day 7

Rate of patients with at least one adverse event (all types and grades) between Day 1 and Day 7:

According to the National Cancer Institute Common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0

Day 7
Change in VAS for lumbalgia
Time Frame: 72 hours
Change in VAS between Day 1 and Day 4.
72 hours
Responder rate for lumbalgia at Day 4.
Time Frame: Day 4
A responder is considered when VAS for low back pain is < 40/100
Day 4
VAS for radiculalgia
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7
VAS for lumbalgia
Time Frame: Day 7
Day 7
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) scale
Time Frame: Day 7
The presence of neuropathic pain will be evaluated by the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) scale. This is a self-questionnaire.The tool evaluates mean pain intensity in the last 24h in a verbal numeric scale from zero (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Total pain intensity score may be calculated by the sum of 10 descriptors.Evolution of the NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory) between Day 1 and Day 4, then between Day 1 and Day 7
Day 7
Dn4 (neuropathic pain screening questionnaire)
Time Frame: Day 7
In the Dn4 questionnaire there are 4 questions with 10 items. Answers are yes or not. At the end of the questionnaire each "no" is considered as 0, each "yes" is considered as 1. The total score is 10. When addition of answers is 4 or more the test is considered as positive.
Day 7
Rate of patients having used at least one interdose
Time Frame: Day 4
Rate of patients having used at least one interdose between Day 1 and Day 4
Day 4
Rate of patients having reduced the associated anti-nociceptive analgesic treatment
Time Frame: Day 7
Rate of patients having reduced the associated anti-nociceptive analgesic treatment (decrease in dosage or step or stop) between Day 4 and and Day 7.
Day 7
Number of interdose of anti-nociceptive analgesics
Time Frame: Day 4
Number of interdose of anti-nociceptive analgesics between Day 1 and Day 4.
Day 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Vincent Ducoulombier, MD, GHICL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiculopathy of Lumbosacral Spine Due to Disc Disorder

Clinical Trials on Gabapentin 300mg

Subscribe