- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05345249
Erector Spinae Plane Block as Pain Management After Lumbar Fusion Surgery (RCT-ESPB)
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Reduction of Early Postoperative Pain Scores and Opioid Use in Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery, a Prospective Double-blinded Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
Rationale: Lumbar spine surgery is associated with high postoperative pain scores and analgesic use, despite use of multimodal analgesia. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a promising locoregional anesthetic technique for this type of surgery. The literature is not yet conclusive about the effectiveness of this technique on reducing postoperative pain intensity.
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the analgesic effect of ESPB as add-on therapy to multimodal analgesia on early postoperative pain intensity after lumbar spinal fusion surgery compared to placebo.
Study design: The study is designed as a prospective mono-centre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Study population: 76 patients ≥ 18 years of age requiring elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery involving one to four fusion levels.
Intervention: Patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESPB with either ropivacaine or placebo at the end of surgery.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is pain intensity upon emergence from anesthesia measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. A minimal clinically important difference is considered to be a decrease of 1.5 points. Secondary endpoints are pain intensity during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid use during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid side effects, use of anti-emetics, time to first opioid use/request, length of hospital stay, quality of recovery at discharge.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The Sint Maartenskliniek is experienced in applying locoregional analgesia, the use of ropivacaine and using sonography. The procedure of administering ESPB has a very low risk of complications. Receiving placebo is justifiable because this group will not be withhold standard treatment. The risks of receiving placebo are negligible. The patients will visit the clinic at regular follow-up moments.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Rationale: Lumbar spine surgery is associated with high postoperative pain scores and analgesic use. Despite multimodal pain treatment, time to first rescue treatment with opioids is often short and necessary on the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Latest scientific insights show most pain interventions produce mild analgesic effects, and advise a multimodal regimen based upon systemic analgesics consisting of at least gabapentoids, ketamine and opioids. Therefore, in our clinic (Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands), multimodal analgesia in spine surgery is now gold standard, with opioids as first choice postoperative rescue treatment. However, despite multimodal treatment, patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery still develop severe postoperative pain.
A different possible measure to lower the risk of postoperative pain is locoregional anesthesia. The Sint Maartenskliniek has a long history of applying locoregional anesthesia in orthopedic surgery. Locoregional anesthesia provides effective analgesia without systemic side-effects like drowsiness or nausea, thereby reducing perioperative systemic drug use and possibly reducing the risk of persistent postsurgical pain. A novel locoregional anesthetic technique is the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Good quality evidence exists for the effectiveness of this technique in breast cancer surgery and video assisted thoracoscopy (VATS). Although ESPB seems a promising analgesic technique for lumbar spine surgery patients not responding to the multimodal pain treatment regimen, sufficient high quality evidence is lacking. A recent systematic review summarized the evidence of ESPB for lumbar spine surgery, including two randomized clinical trials (RCT), showing beginning evidence of reduced postoperative opioid consumption and decreased pain scores. However, these trials contained a small sample size, were not blinded or lacked a comparator. Furthermore, little information on postoperative hospital stay is provided. This results in ESPB not being widely accepted in lumbar spine surgery. The larger, double-blinded, placebo-controlled methodology in this proposed trial aims to contribute to the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of EPSB in a multimodal analgesia management setting.
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the analgesic effect of ESPB on early postoperative pain after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Therefore the pain intensity in the postoperative care unit upon emergence, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, will be the primary outcome parameter of this study. The null hypothesis states there is no difference in effectiveness of the ESPB compared to placebo on early postoperative pain intensity measured with NRS in patients that underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgery. This hypothesis will be tested two-sided, with α = 0.05.
Study design: This study is designed as a prospective, mono-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo controlled trial. The study will be performed at the Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The study will be performed in accordance with the ICH E6(R1) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. The duration of the study will be determined according to the progress of inclusion. Patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery will be studied. Subject of investigation is the locoregional anesthetic technique ESPB. Subjects will be randomized to receive either ESPB with a long-acting local anesthetic or normal saline (placebo).
The staff involved (doctors, nurses, OR-personal), as well as the research team and the patient will be blinded for treatment allocation. The study period includes in-hospital time after surgery and follow-up 30 days after surgery. Placement of the ESPB will be performed according to the study protocol, at the end of surgery, after wound closure. The placement of the ESPB is performed according to daily clinical practice as described by Forero et al. Postoperative treatment of patients will be according to standard hospital protocol for lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Study population: 76 patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery involving one to four fusion levels will be recruited.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is pain intensity upon emergence from anesthesia measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. A minimal clinically important difference is considered to be a decrease of 1.5 points. Secondary endpoints are pain intensity during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid use during hospital stay and after 30 days, opioid side effects, use of anti-emetics, time to first opioid use/request, length of hospital stay, quality of recovery at discharge.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The Sint Maartenskliniek is experienced in applying locoregional analgesia, the use of ropivacaine and using sonography. The procedure of administering ESPB has a very low risk of complications. Receiving placebo is justifiable because this group will not be withhold standard treatment. The risks of receiving placebo are negligible. The patients will visit the clinic at regular follow-up moments.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: I.H. van de Wijgert, MSc, MD
- Phone Number: +31243272593
- Email: i.vandewijgert@maartenskliniek.nl
Study Locations
-
-
Gelderland
-
Ubbergen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500GM
- Sint Maartenskliniek
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients planned for elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery with a dorsal surgical approach;
- 1-4 fusion level spine surgery;
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 kg/m²;
- ASA physical health classification > 3;
- Patients who will undergo spine surgery involving less than 2 or more than 4 levels of fusion, scoliosis surgery*;
- Patients who will undergo circumferent spine surgery;
- Patients with an active, local infection or systemic infection;
- Patients with an allergy to one or more medications used in the study;
- Patients with any contraindication to a regional anesthetic technique;
- Kidney- or liver failure inhibiting the systemic use of paracetamol and/or NSAIDs;
- Acute surgeries;
- Patients with a history of drugs or alcohol abuse;
- Pregnancy;
- Cognitive impairment;
- Inability to speak or understand the Dutch language.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ESPB with ropivacaine
Patients in the experimental group will receive locoregional analgesia via ESPB with injectate consisting of ropivacaine 0.375 mg/mL with no additives, two times 30mL bilaterally at the transverse processs of the T12-vertebra (total dose of 225 mg).
|
Investigating the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block with ropivacaine for lumbar spinal fusion surgery versus placebo.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: ESPB with placebo
Patients in the placebo group will receive an injection performed as the procedure of ESPB with injectate consisting of sodiumchloride 0.9% with no additives, two times 30mL bilaterally at the transverse processs of the T12-vertebra.
|
Placebo comparator
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain intensity one hour after arrival at post-anesthesia care unit
Time Frame: 1 hour after arrival at PACU
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain) as asked by PACU-nurse
|
1 hour after arrival at PACU
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acceptability of pain
Time Frame: 1 hour after arrival at PACU
|
Yes/no
|
1 hour after arrival at PACU
|
Opioid use
Time Frame: 0-12 hours, 12-24 hours after surgery
|
total morphine equivalent dose as extracted from the electronic medical file and PCIA pump
|
0-12 hours, 12-24 hours after surgery
|
Presence of opioid side effects
Time Frame: 12 hours, 24 hours after surgery
|
Nausea, vomiting and use of anti-emetics as documented in electronic medical file
|
12 hours, 24 hours after surgery
|
Time to first opioid use/request
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
|
defined as minutes
|
12 hours after surgery
|
Time to first mobilization
Time Frame: 72 hours after surgery
|
defined as hours
|
72 hours after surgery
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
|
defined as days
|
up to 30 days after surgery
|
Pain intensity
Time Frame: on postoperative admission days, 30 days
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain)
|
on postoperative admission days, 30 days
|
Opioid use
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
|
Do you use opioids yes/no
|
30 days after surgery
|
Quality of recovery
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1 and 3
|
Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (Dutch version).
Score 0-150 (0 = worst recovery, 150 = perfect recovery)
|
Postoperative day 1 and 3
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: 0-30 days after surgery
|
(Serious) adverse events during study period
|
0-30 days after surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Drain wound leakage
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1, 2 and 3
|
mLs of drain wound leakage, if drain is present
|
Postoperative day 1, 2 and 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: M.G.E. Fenten, MSc, PhD, MD, Sint Maartenskliniek
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Singh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603.
- Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
- Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.
- Alboog A, Bae S, Chui J. Anesthetic management of complex spine surgery in adult patients: a review based on outcome evidence. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;32(5):600-608. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000765.
- Huang W, Wang W, Xie W, Chen Z, Liu Y. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Nov;66:109900. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109900. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
- Qiu Y, Zhang TJ, Hua Z. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res. 2020 Jul 1;13:1611-1619. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S256205. eCollection 2020.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
- Bone Diseases
- Hernia
- Spondylolysis
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement
- Radiculopathy
- Spinal Diseases
- Spinal Stenosis
- Spondylosis
- Spondylolisthesis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Anesthetics, Local
- Ropivacaine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0984
- 2021-003679-32 (EudraCT Number)
- NL9640 (Other Identifier: Netherlands Trial Register)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...RecruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Disc DegenerationChina
-
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial HospitalTerminatedLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Traction | Spinal Manipulation | Lumbar SurgeryTaiwan
-
Intrinsic TherapeuticsActive, not recruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Annular Disc Tear | Annular Tear of Lumbar DiscBelgium, Germany
-
Allina Health SystemTwin Cities Spine CenterRecruitingLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Holger JoswigCompletedLumbar Disc Herniation | Cervical Disc HerniationSwitzerland
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbar Spine SurgeryTurkey
-
Medtronic Spinal and BiologicsCompletedDegenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar | Disc Herniation, LumbarCzech Republic, Slovakia, Venezuela
-
Jaseng Medical FoundationRecruitingLumbar Disc HerniationKorea, Republic of
-
Firat UniversityRecruiting
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine Hydrochloride Injection
-
Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.RecruitingThoracoscopic LobectomyChina
-
China Medical University, ChinaCompleted
-
Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Active, not recruitingTotal Knee ArthroplastyChina
-
Hvidovre University HospitalUnknownPain, PostoperativeDenmark
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
-
Chuncheon Sacred Heart HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Chuncheon Sacred Heart HospitalNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Femoral Nerve BlockKorea, Republic of
-
Chuncheon Sacred Heart HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Chuncheon Sacred Heart HospitalNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Femoral Nerve BlockKorea, Republic of
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruiting