- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04891978
US PRECISION Implementation Study
Implementation of the US PRECISION AIRQ, Asthma Checklist, and Educational Resources (PRECISION Program) Into Clinical Practice Using Telehealth and In-Person Platforms
The primary objective of this community program intervention study is to assess the process and potential benefits of integrating the AIRQ®, Asthma Checklist, and educational resources (PRECISION program) into clinical practice using either in-person or telehealth visits.
The secondary objectives are to assess asthma patients' clinic visit experiences when the AIRQ, the Asthma Checklist, and educational resources (PRECISION program) are utilized as part of a telehealth or in-person visit with their HCP, and to explore change in AIRQ scores from the initial visit to follow-up visit(s) (when available).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This community program intervention study will examine the process of integrating the AIRQ, Asthma Checklist, and educational resources (PRECISION program) into clinical practice using either in-person or telehealth visits. Providers use of patients' responses to the AIRQ, Asthma Checklist, and educational resources to guide treatment and asthma work-up and management also will be examined. The study duration is 12-months, with study enrollment lasting nine (9) months for each site (implementation stage), and an additional three (3) months of follow-up to assess the sustainability of using the PRECISION program in clinical practice (sustainability stage). The nine-month implementation stage will allow for the recruitment of approximately 50 patients at each site (maximum of 75 patients at each site) for an initial study visit, plus the potential for follow-up visit(s). The three-month sustainability stage will allow for sites to continue to implement the PRECISION program in their clinical practice and for sites to describe any continued benefits of using the PRECISION program at their site.
Approximately fifteen (15) to twenty (20) clinical sites will be recruited to participate in this study, categorized into the following four practice clusters: (1) primary care site (e.g., private practice, FQHC; (2) specialty care site (pulmonary, asthma/immunology); and (3) novel sites (e.g., pharmacy, nurse practitioners, nurse educators, prescribers and Non-prescribers, telehealth component of Allergy and Asthma Network. While all sites will be able to conduct both in-person and telehealth visits, sites will aim to conduct a minimum of approximately 25% of their initial patient visit using a telehealth platform. Both platforms (in-person and telehealth) can be used for the follow-up visit(s) for all practice types.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35209
- Research Site
-
-
Florida
-
Leesburg, Florida, United States, 34748
- Research Site
-
-
Hawaii
-
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96819
- Research Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46802
- Research Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Tewksbury, Massachusetts, United States, 01876
- Research Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
Cornwall, New York, United States, 12518
- Research Site
-
Rochester, New York, United States, 14607
- Research Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28801
- Research Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19148
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78249
- Research Site
-
-
Virginia
-
Vienna, Virginia, United States, 22182
- Research Site
-
-
West Virginia
-
Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25304
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- >= 13 years of age at the time of enrollment
- Diagnosis of HCP-confirmed asthma
- Able to read, understand and speak English or Spanish sufficiently self-complete or be administered the AIRQ via telephone, desktop, or mobile device (e.g., smartphone, iPad)
- Provide consent (adults/parents/guardians) and assent (age 13-17 years) to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current diagnosis of active COPD or any lower respiratory diagnosis other than asthma
- Has a cognitive impairment, hearing difficulty, acute psychopathology, medical condition, or insufficient knowledge of the English or Spanish language that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with his or her ability to agree to participate and/or complete the AIRQ or other study questionnaires
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AIRQ, Asthma Checklist, and PRECISION Program
All participants in the trial will be given the behavioral interventions which include the AIRQ tool, the Asthma Checklist tool, and the PRECISION program educational resources.
|
A validated tool designed to identify patients who may be at risk for adverse outcomes from uncontrolled asthma.
A validated, 3-page tool, based on GINA and NAEPP guidelines to assist providers with recognition, evaluation, and optimization of all patients with asthma.
In this study, healthcare providers will be required to complete the assess component (page 1) of the Asthma Checklist .
Educational resources accessible to all providers in the study.
There are provider-facing and patient-facing educational materials that can be accessed during the patient visit or as resources for before/after visits.
Resources can be downloaded and sent to patients per the discretion of providers.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for Each Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Overall Ease of Implementing AIRQ Into Clinical Practice.
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., how would you rate the overall ease of implementing the AIRQ into your clinical practice using the telehealth platform?)
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to How Much the AIRQ Helped Manage Patients
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., Did AIRQ help you manage your patients?)
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Whether the AIRQ Helped Identify Patients at Risk for Adverse Asthma Health Outcomes
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., Did AIRQ help you identify patients who were at risk for adverse health outcomes from their asthma that you would have otherwise missed?)
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for Each Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Most and Least Helpful Parts of AIRQ
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., What did you find most useful about AIRQ?)
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Frequency of Referring to a Specialist or Practice Type Different Than Their Own While Using the AIRQ
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., While using AIRQ how often did you refer to a specialist or practice type different than your own?)
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for the Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Components of Care Improved by AIRQ
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., Did AIRQ improve any of the following?)
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Percentage Endorsement of Responses by Site HCPs for Each Categorical Item on the Post-study Survey Relating to Importance of Using Different Components of the PRECISION Program
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey includes questions regarding the implementation of the PRECISION program at the site (e.g., How important was it for you to use the Assess component of the Asthma Checklist (page 1) with the AIRQ?).
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Average Number of Patients Treated Using the PRECISION Program at Each Site as Reported by Site HCPs by Site Type
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
The post-study HCP survey asks sites to report the number of patients treated using the PRECISION program at their site.
One HCP per site reported on the number of patients treated using the PRECISION program at their site.
The mean presented is the number of patients at each site as reported by site HCPs divided by the number of sites.
|
Post-study survey was completed between 5 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site (or 6 weeks for the novel care site).
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site HCP Responses to Open-ended Question on Post-study Survey on Features of PRECISION Program: Primary Care Sites
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 32.9 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
On the post-study survey, one HCP per site (site PI) was asked to describe the features of the PRECISION program they thought were the most useful and could be improved when implemented at their site
|
Post-study survey was completed between 32.9 weeks and 50.6 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site HCP Responses to Open-ended Question on Post-study Survey on Features of PRECISION Program: Specialty Care Sites
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed between 22.1 weeks and 50.4 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
On the post-study survey, one HCP per site (site PI) was asked to describe the features of the PRECISION program they thought were most useful and could be improved when implemented at their site
|
Post-study survey was completed between 22.1 weeks and 50.4 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site HCP Responses to Open-ended Question on Post-study Survey on Features of PRECISION Program: Novel Care Site
Time Frame: Post-study survey was completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
On the post-study survey, one HCP per site (site PI) was asked to describe the features of the PRECISION program they thought were most useful and could be improved when implemented at their site
|
Post-study survey was completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Clinician Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Primary Care Sites
Time Frame: Post-study clinician interviews were completed between -2 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 52.4 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
Site clinicians were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
|
Post-study clinician interviews were completed between -2 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 52.4 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Key Site Staff Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Primary Care Sites
Time Frame: Post-study key site staff interviews were completed between -2 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 43 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
Key site staff were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
|
Post-study key site staff interviews were completed between -2 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 43 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Clinician Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Specialty Care Sites
Time Frame: Post-study clinician interviews were completed between -6.3 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 23 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
Site clinicians were asked to respond to several open-ended interview questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
|
Post-study clinician interviews were completed between -6.3 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 23 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Key Site Staff Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Specialty Care Sites
Time Frame: Post-study site staff interviews were completed between -6.3 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 4.7 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
Key site staff were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
|
Post-study site staff interviews were completed between -6.3 weeks (interviews completed a little sooner than end of follow-up) and 4.7 weeks of last patient end of follow-up across sites; end of follow up was 36 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text HCP Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Novel Site
Time Frame: Post-study HCP interviews were completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
Site HCPs were asked to respond to several open-ended interview questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
|
Post-study HCP interviews were completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Key Site Staff Responses to the Qualitative Interview Questions on Implementation and Features of the Asthma Precision Program: Novel Site
Time Frame: Post-study key site staff interviews were completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
Key site staff were asked to respond to several open-ended questions regarding background information about the site, the implementation process at their site, use of the Asthma Checklist and educational resources, and feedback on the entire program.
|
Post-study key site staff interviews were completed 5 weeks after last patient end of follow-up; end of follow up was 6 weeks from last patient enrolled at site.
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Primary Care Sites (Month 1)
Time Frame: Month 1 after start of implementation
|
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
|
Month 1 after start of implementation
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Primary Care Sites (Month 2)
Time Frame: Month 2 after start of implementation
|
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
|
Month 2 after start of implementation
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Specialty Care Sites (Month 1)
Time Frame: Month 1 after start of implementation
|
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
|
Month 1 after start of implementation
|
|
Descriptive Free-text Site Staff Responses to the Implementation Touchpoint Questions: Novel Care Site (Month 2)
Time Frame: Month 2 after start of implementation
|
At each touchpoint, site staff were asked to respond to questions about the implementation of the PRECISION program (e.g., what aspects of the study implementation are going well for your site?)
|
Month 2 after start of implementation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient AIRQ Score From Baseline to Follow-up Visits: Mean and Standard Deviation at Each Visit
Time Frame: Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
|
AIRQ scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate more well-controlled asthma The AIRQ was used for the initial study visit, and a follow-up AIRQ that employs the same 10 questions as the AIRQ but for the 3 risk questions where exacerbation history covers a 3 month look-back period instead of a 12 month look-back period was used for follow-up visits. |
Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
|
|
Change in Patient AIRQ Score From Baseline to Follow-up Visits: Mean Difference and Confidence Interval
Time Frame: Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
|
AIRQ scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate more well-controlled asthma The AIRQ was used for the initial study visit, and a follow-up AIRQ that employs the same 10 questions as the AIRQ but for the 3 risk questions where exacerbation history covers a 3 month look-back period instead of a 12 month look-back period was used for follow-up visits. |
Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
|
|
Change in Patient AIRQ Control Level From Baseline to Follow-up Visit
Time Frame: Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
|
AIRQ Control level can be categorized as "well controlled", "not-well controlled" or "very poorly controlled" The AIRQ was used for the initial study visit, and a follow-up AIRQ that employs the same 10 questions as the AIRQ but for the 3 risk questions where exacerbation history covers a 3 month look-back period instead of a 12 month look-back period was used for follow-up visits. |
Mean (SD) time to follow-up was 3.3 (SD = 1.4) months
|
|
Percentage of Endorsement of Responses for Each of the 8 Categorical Items on the ACE Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The ACE questionnaire includes 8 items each with Likert scale responses (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree).
Participants completed this measure via a patient web survey.
|
Baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in frequency of OCS
Time Frame: 12 months pre-baseline vs. 12 months
|
Evaluation of available exacerbation data from selected sites
|
12 months pre-baseline vs. 12 months
|
|
Change in frequency of ER/unplanned visits
Time Frame: 12 months pre-baseline vs. 12 months
|
Evaluation of available exacerbation data from selected sites
|
12 months pre-baseline vs. 12 months
|
|
Change in frequency of hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 months pre-baseline vs. 12 months
|
Evaluation of available exacerbation data from selected sites
|
12 months pre-baseline vs. 12 months
|
|
Change in mean cost of asthma care
Time Frame: 12 months pre-baseline vs 12 months
|
Evaluation of available exacerbation data from selected sites
|
12 months pre-baseline vs 12 months
|
|
Correlation between AIRQ scores and practice patterns by practice cluster
Time Frame: Baseline
|
AIRQ scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate more well controlled asthma. Practice patterns will be evaluated based on the assess component of the Asthma Checklist (step-up/step down/no change in therapy; referral to specialist; initiation of biologic) |
Baseline
|
|
Correlation between AIRQ scores and practice patterns by practice cluster
Time Frame: Follow-up, average of 3 months
|
AIRQ scores range from 0 to 10, where lower scores indicate more well controlled asthma. Practice patterns will be evaluated based on the assess component of the Asthma Checklist (step-up/step down/no change in therapy; referral to specialist; initiation of biologic) |
Follow-up, average of 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D2287L00028
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal.
All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Asthma
-
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCSRecruitingAsthma in Children | Asthma Acute | Asthma Crisis | Asthma ChildhoodItaly
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)RecruitingAsthma Exacerbation | Childhood Asthma | Air Pollution, Risk Reduction Behaviors | Asthma ControlUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterWithdrawnAsthma in Children | Asthma Attack | Asthma Acute | Acute Asthma Exacerbation | Asthma; StatusUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompletedAsthma in Children | Asthma Attack | Asthma Acute | Asthma ChronicUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingAcute Asthma | Pediatric Asthma | Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation | BiPAPUnited States
-
SingHealth PolyclinicsRecruitingAsthma | Asthma in Children | Asthma Attack | Asthma Acute | Asthma ChronicSingapore
-
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalCompleted
-
Chiesi Slovenija, d.o.o.RecruitingAsthma | Asthma Bronchiale | Asthma PatientsSlovenia
-
Gümüşhane UniversıtyCompletedAsthma | Asthma Chronic | Asthma ControlTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Parc de Salut MarActive, not recruitingAsthma in Children | Persistent Asthma | Asthma ExacerbationSpain
Clinical Trials on AIRQ
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedTechniques of Endotracheal Intubation in PediatricsEgypt
-
Menoufia UniversityCompleted
-
University of British ColumbiaCompleted
-
Université de SherbrookeCompletedDifficult IntubationCanada