Assessment of the Impact of Clinical Pharmacogenomics on Real and Potential Medication Use in Veterans

August 8, 2022 updated by: Courtney Watts Alexander, Auburn University
The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of veterans with major depressive disorder (MDD) who are being treated with a medication that has current Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) or Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) actionable recommendations that have a pharmacogenomic variation that impacts the safety or efficacy of the subject medication.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States, 35404
        • Tuscaloosa VAMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 19 years
  2. Prescribed at least one chronic medication for mental health which is considered pharmacogenomically actionable, as defined above (amitriptyline, doxepin, imipramine, nortriptyline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine).
  3. Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is a prisoner or is under a court order for treatment as part of a sentence or incarceration
  2. Persistent medication non-adherence for reasons not potentially linked to pharmacogenomic variation (e.g. inability to obtain medications due to cost; non-adherence due to cognitive impairment)
  3. Individuals receiving mental health treatment/care from a non-VA facility
  4. Individuals who are terminally ill
  5. Inability to communicate in and/or understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pharmacogenomic Screening
Eligible patients who verbally consent to participate will receive two pharmacogenomics telehealth visits.

First telehealth appointment:

  1. Pharmacogenomics education and informed consent
  2. Medical history
  3. Sample collection

Second telehealth appointment:

  1. Results of pharmacogenomic testing
  2. Utility and limitations of pharmacogenomic testing
  3. Patient-specific potential impacts on current or future medication therapies
  4. Answering of patient questions
  5. Referral to mental health provider(s) for treatment-specific recommendations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of pharmacogenomic variation with actionable recommendations for medications currently utilized
Time Frame: At enrollment
A medication history will be conducted at enrollment to ensure patient meets criteria for enrollment. Patients will provide a saliva sample at this timepoint. The rate of pharmacogenomic variation will be calculated based on current medications at enrollment; however, the pharmacogenomic screening panel may take up to 6 weeks to return to the patient and investigator.
At enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of pharmacogenomic variation with actionable recommendations for all actionable medications
Time Frame: At enrollment
At enrollment
Mental health disease state control/progression utilizing disease state-specific validated tools
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Validated, disease state-specific tools will be utilized to assess control or progression. Specifically, depression control will be assessed utilizing PHQ-9 as documented within the chart. This will be assessed via retrospective chart review.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Medication-related costs
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Claims data will be used to assess medication-related costs at specific time points.
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Medication-related adverse events
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Number of primary care, mental health provider, mental health pharmacist, specialist, and emergency room visits and hospitalizations
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Patient reported medication adherence and reasons for non-adherence
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Patient reported reasons for non-adherence
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Number of pharmacogenomic recommendations made and accepted
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Type of pharmacogenomic recommendations made and accepted
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Number of non-pharmacogenomic recommendations made and accepted
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
Type of non-pharmacogenomic recommendations made and accepted
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review
3-, 6-, and 12-months post-recommendation via retrospective chart review

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kimberly B Lloyd, Pharm.D., Auburn University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TVA_IRBNetID_1614352

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder, Major

Clinical Trials on Pharmacogenomic Screening

Subscribe