Shared Decision Making in Rural Primary Care Lung Cancer Screening and Smoking Cessation (SDM-LCS-SC)

March 13, 2024 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
The intervention is aimed to improve adherence to the lung cancer screening (LCS) guidelines and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage criteria to conduct shared decision-making (SDM) and provide smoking cessation services in rural primary care practices.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The pilot intervention will engage no more than 300 patients using a pragmatic, pre-post design guided by an enhanced RE-AIM/PRISM framework. The primary goal of this intervention is to improve LCS practice by offering a formal SDM process and smoking cessation support aligned with the CMS coverage criteria. The investigators will conduct a type II effectiveness implementation hybrid trial using a stepped wedge design to evaluate the effectiveness (co-primary outcomes of LCS and decision quality) and implementation at four rural clinics. Space precludes discussion of pragmatic design features, but this study was designed to be pragmatic using the PRECIS-2 criteria and it scores highly on almost all PRECIS-2 dimensions.

Each clinic will recruit the minimum of 9 patients eligible to LCS (based on CMS guidelines) every 2 months for the total of 8 months. The first period of 2 months is for baseline data, the second period of 2 months is for step 1 of the stepped wedge design, the third period of 2 months is for step 2 and finally the last 4th period of 2 months is for step 3 of the stepped wedge design. Each participating patient will receive 2 surveys (one immediately after the doctor's visit and a second one a month later). The intervention will be in the form of patient decision aid (information flyer) the participant receives during a healthcare provider visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Asymptomatic to lung cancer symptoms
  • Tobacco smoking history of 20+ pack-years
  • Current smoker or quit within last 15 years

Exclusion Criteria:

- A patient that does not meet inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
The control group will consist of each participant and clinic before the intervention (baseline, first 2 months).
Active Comparator: Patient decision aid
The intervention group will consist of each participant and clinic once they move to the intervention phase (stepped-wedge design: practices will be randomized into step 1, 2 or 3; for step 1: the intervention will start at 2 months, for step 2: the intervention will start at 4 months, for step 3: the intervention will start at 6 months).
Each subject will receive an informational flyer describing lung cancer screening options and smoking cessation from a trained person on the medical staff at each clinic. Staff will lead a shared decision-making discussion with the patient.
Other Names:
  • Informational flyer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of participants who's health visit adhered to the LCS guidelines and CMS coverage criteria in rural primary care practices: baseline survey
Time Frame: Baseline

The adherence to the LCS guidelines and CMS coverage criteria to conduct SDM and provide smoking cessation services in rural primary care practices (is a latent variable) and will be measured as a composite measure using variables in a baseline survey administered immediately after healthcare provider's visit (baseline).

A survey tool will be developed and used to count "Yes" response to the following survey questions:

Were you given a decision aid during your last clinic visit/call? Was the clinic provider or staff able to go over the decision aid together with you during your last clinic visit/call? Were you recommended for a low-dose CAT scan by your provider during your last clinic visit/call?

Baseline
Count of participants who's health visit adhered to the LCS guidelines and CMS coverage criteria in rural primary care practices: follow-up survey
Time Frame: 1 month follow-up

The adherence to the LCS guidelines and CMS coverage criteria to conduct SDM and provide smoking cessation services in rural primary care practices (is a latent variable) and will be measured as a composite measure using variables in a baseline survey administered immediately after the healthcare provider's visit (follow-up).

A survey tool will be developed and used to count "Yes" response to the following survey questions:

Were you given a decision aid during your last clinic visit/call? Was the clinic provider or staff able to go over the decision aid together with you during your last clinic visit/call? Were you recommended for a low-dose computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan by your provider during your last clinic visit/call?

1 month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient knowledge about lung cancer
Time Frame: Baseline

Patient knowledge about lung cancer will be measured by 5 survey questions previously used by Lau et al in their peer-reviewed manuscript published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine titled Evaluation of a Personalized, Web-Based Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening. The level of knowledge will be assessed based on correct answers to the following survey questions:

  1. Factors that increase chances of developing lung cancer include;
  2. Possible benefits of lung cancer screening are;
  3. Possible harms of lung cancer screening include;
  4. Please indicate whether each of the following individuals would be eligible for screening based on their age. They all meet the smoking status and pack-year criteria;
  5. What percentage of lumps found on your lungs by the CT screening is NOT going to be cancer?

More correct answers indicate higher level of knowledge.

Baseline
Patient knowledge about lung cancer
Time Frame: 1 month follow up

Patient knowledge about lung cancer will be measured by 5 survey questions previously used by Lau et al in their peer-reviewed manuscript published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine titled Evaluation of a Personalized, Web-Based Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening. The level of knowledge will be assessed based on correct answers to the following survey questions:

  1. Factors that increase the chances of developing lung cancer include;
  2. Possible benefits of lung cancer screening are;
  3. Possible harms of lung cancer screening include;
  4. Please indicate whether each of the following individuals would be eligible for screening based on their age. They all meet the smoking status and pack-year criteria;
  5. What percentage of lumps found on your lungs by the CT screening is NOT going to be cancer?

More correct answers indicate higher level of knowledge.

1 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Russell Glasgow, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-1706.cc
  • P50CA244688 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2021-04394 (Other Identifier: CTRP)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoking Cessation

Clinical Trials on Patient decision aid

3
Subscribe