Bright Light Intervention to Reduce Students' Stress (BLISS)

September 14, 2023 updated by: Markus Canazei, Universitaet Innsbruck

Effects of Bright Morning Light Exposure on Students' Stress, Mood, Anxiety, Sleep and, Circadian Rest-activity Cycle

Increased stress levels are a significant problem for many students and represent a risk factor for impaired mental and physical health as well as academic performance. Stress levels are particularly high during the preparation phase for major exams.

There is good evidence that light therapy is an effective treatment option to improve mood in affective disorders.

The present study aims at investigating the psychophysiological effects of a 3-week morning bright light exposure in reducing stress and stress-related problems in students preparing for major exams.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Increased students' stress represents a significant risk factor for impaired mental and physical health as well as academic performance. The World Mental Health Survey (WHO) reports a 12-month prevalence of mental illness of 20.3% among students, with anxiety disorders (14.7%), affective disorders (9.9%), and substance abuse (6.7%) being particularly prominent. Moreover, six out of 10 students suffer from impaired sleep quality.

Offering an effective treatment for stress-related symptoms in students is a challenge. In situations of intense stress, conventional methods such as relaxation and mindfulness-based programs often fail because of poor prior practice. Only a few students apply cognitive behavioral interventions. Although medication might decrease stress symptoms within days, the side effects of drugs cannot be ignored. Therefore, there is a need for effective and efficient treatment of acute stress symptoms in students.

Bright light therapy is an effective treatment for several mental disorders, e.g. affective disorders and sleep disorders. There is some evidence, that exposure to bright light may even reduce stress in patients with burnout symptoms. Thus, exposure to bright light may be a promising new option to reduce academic stress and improve mood and sleep parameters.

In the present study, a large-area desk lamp, which emits diffuse light and is controllable in its luminance and correlated color temperature is used. Study participants are randomly assigned to one of three study arms: (i) exposure to polychromatic light of 5,000 lux and 5,300 Kelvin, (ii) exposure to polychromatic light of 50 lux and 2,200 Kelvin, or (iii) no light intervention. Data collection takes place in winter periods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

125

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • students from the faculty of medicine, pharmacy, and law
  • major exam at least 5 weeks ahead
  • possession of smartphone and data plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major depressive disorder (PHQ-9): Score > 4
  • suicidal ideation (BDI, Item i): Rating > 1
  • seasonal affective disorder (PIDS-A): Score > 11
  • taking medication which increases photo-sensitivity
  • taking medication to increase cognitive performance
  • starting or changing pharmacotherapy for affective disorders and anxiety disorders within the last two weeks
  • changing of all kinds of medication within the last two weeks
  • headache (PHQ-D, Item f): Rating "severly impaired"
  • increased light sensitivity: Item "Wearing sunglasses outside on sunny days" is answered with 'often' or 'very often'
  • currently undergoing psychotherapeutic treatment
  • the presence of an eye disease for which light therapy is contraindicated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: bright white light intervention
exposure to 5,000 lux with polychromatic white light with 5,300 Kelvin at eye level; light exposure starts immediately after awakening; light exposure takes place on weekdays (Monday till Friday) over a period of 3 weeks
Exposure with 5,000 lux at eye level for one hour and a Correlated Color Temperature of 5,300 Kelvin every morning for three weeks.
Placebo Comparator: dim reddish light intervention
exposure to 50 lux with polychromatic reddish light with 2,200 Kelvin at eye level; light exposure starts immediately after awakening; light exposure takes place on weekdays (Monday till Friday) over a period of 3 weeks
Exposure with 50 lux at eye level for one hour and a Correlated Color Temperature of 2,200 Kelvin every morning for three weeks.
No Intervention: no light intervention
no light intervention takes place in the morning; the study participants follow their natural rhythm of life

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
subjective stress level - baseline/post
Time Frame: Change from baseline PSS-10 sum score at the end of week 3
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10); scale: PSS-10 sum score; range:0 - 40; higher scores mean a higher subjective stress level
Change from baseline PSS-10 sum score at the end of week 3
subjective stress level - baseline/post
Time Frame: Change from baseline PSQ-20 sum score at the end of week 3
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-20); scale: PSQ-20 sum score; range: 20 - 80; higher scores mean a higher subjective stress level
Change from baseline PSQ-20 sum score at the end of week 3
subjective stress level - on weekdays
Time Frame: Change of daily PSQ-20 sum score at each weekday during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-20); scale: PSQ-20 sum score; range: 20 - 80; higher scores mean a higher subjective stress level
Change of daily PSQ-20 sum score at each weekday during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
anxiety
Time Frame: Change from baseline STAI-trait sum score at the end of week 3
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI - form Y) - 20 trait items; scale: STAI-trait sum score; range: 20 - 80; higher scores mean a higher subjective anxiety level
Change from baseline STAI-trait sum score at the end of week 3
mood
Time Frame: Change from baseline CES-D sum score at the end of week 3
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES--D); scale: CES-D sum score; range: 0 - 60; higher scores mean a higher subjective depression level
Change from baseline CES-D sum score at the end of week 3
sleep quality
Time Frame: Change from baseline global PSQI score at the end of week 3
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); scale: global PSQI score; range: 0 - 21; higher scores mean a lower subjective sleep quality
Change from baseline global PSQI score at the end of week 3
sleep quality - total sleep time
Time Frame: Change of TST at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
Wrist actimetry to measure daily total sleep time (TST); scale: sleep duration; range: >0 (minutes); higher TST means longer sleep period
Change of TST at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
sleep quality - sleep onset latency
Time Frame: change of SOL at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
Wrist actimetry to measure daily sleep onset latency (SOL); scale: duration to fall asleep; range: >0 (minutes); higher SOL means longer period to fall asleep
change of SOL at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
sleep quality - wake after sleep onset
Time Frame: change of WASO at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
Wrist actimetry to measure daily wake after sleep onset (WASO); scale: duration of being awake during sleep period; range: greater than or equal to 0 (minutes); higher WASO means longer wake periods after sleep onset
change of WASO at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
sleep quality - sleep efficiency
Time Frame: change of SE at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
Wrist actimetry to measure daily sleep efficiency (SE); scale: percentage; range: 0 - 100; higher SE means a higher undisturbed sleep
change of SE at each night during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
circadian rest/activity rhythm - interdaily stability
Time Frame: change of IV at each of the three light intervention weeks up to 3 weeks
Circadian rest-activity cycle parameter interdaily stability (IS) derived from weekly wrist actimetry data; scale: real number; range: 0 -1; higher IS means a higher stability in daily rest-activity cycles
change of IV at each of the three light intervention weeks up to 3 weeks
circadian rest/activity rhythm - intradaily variability
Time Frame: change of IS at each of the three light intervention weeks up to 3 weeks
Circadian rest-activity cycle parameter intradaily variability (IV) derived from averaged wrist actimetry data over a period of 1 week; scale: real number; range: 0 - 2; higher IV means a higher variability in 24-h rest-activity cycle
change of IS at each of the three light intervention weeks up to 3 weeks
physiological stress reaction
Time Frame: Change from baseline hair cortisol level at the end of week 3
cortisol level measured from hair sample; scale: real number (pg/mg); range: >0; higher hair cortisol level means higher physiological stress
Change from baseline hair cortisol level at the end of week 3
adverse effects - short-term
Time Frame: day 5
astenopic complaints measured with 12 items; scale: sum score; range: 10 - 60; higher sum score means more astenopic complaints
day 5
adverse effects - long-term
Time Frame: day 15
astenopic complaints scale measured with 12 items: sum score; range: 10 - 60; higher sum score means more astenopic complaints
day 15

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
resilience
Time Frame: Change from baseline RS-11 sum score at the end of week 3
Resilience Scale (RS-11); scale: RS-11 sum score; range: 11 - 77; higher RS-11 sum score means more perceived resilience
Change from baseline RS-11 sum score at the end of week 3
stress coping
Time Frame: Change from baseline multidimensional CISS scale at the end of week 3
Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) - 24 items; three-dimensional CISS scale: (a) task-oriented coping; (b) emotion-oriented coping, and (c) avoidance-oriented coping; range for each dimension: 8 - 40; higher score in each dimension means higher preference for particular stress coping style
Change from baseline multidimensional CISS scale at the end of week 3
learning strategies
Time Frame: Change from baseline multidimensional LIST-K scale at the end of week 3
Learning Strategies of University Students (LIST-K) - 36 items; multidimensional LIST-K scale: 13 subscales; range for each dimension: 3 - 15; higher score in each dimension means higher preference for particular learning strategy
Change from baseline multidimensional LIST-K scale at the end of week 3
psychological distress
Time Frame: Change from baseline BSI-18 overall score at the end of week 3
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18); scale: BSI-18 sum score; range: 18 - 90; higher BSI-18 sum score means higher psychological distress
Change from baseline BSI-18 overall score at the end of week 3
somatic symptoms
Time Frame: Change from baseline SSS-8 sum score at the end of week 3
The somatic symptom scale (SSS-8); scale: SSS-8 sum score; range: 0 - 32; higher SSS-8 sum score means higher somatic complaints
Change from baseline SSS-8 sum score at the end of week 3
satisfaction with light intervention - short-term
Time Frame: day 5
2 items: (a) recommendation of light intervention to a friend and (b) follow-up usage of light intervention for own purposes; scale: binary score ('yes', 'no'); range: 0 - 1; higher binary scores indicate recommendation and follow-up usage of the light intervention
day 5
satisfaction with light intervention - long-term
Time Frame: day 15
2 items: (a) recommendation of light intervention to a friend and (b) follow-up usage of light intervention for own purposes; scale: binary score ('yes', 'no'); range: 0 - 1; higher binary scores indicate recommendation and follow-up usage of the light intervention
day 15
daily mood state
Time Frame: changes from before the light intervention of the two-dimensional PANAS scale at the end of light intervention at each weekday during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); two-dimensional PANAS scale: sum score for positive and negative mood state; range for each dimension: 10 - 50; higher PANAS scores mean higher positive and negative mood state, respectively
changes from before the light intervention of the two-dimensional PANAS scale at the end of light intervention at each weekday during the light intervention period up to 3 weeks
weekly social rhythms
Time Frame: changes in SRM scores in week 1, week 2, and week 3
The Social Rhythm Metric (SRM) measures the regularity in the occurance of 17 daily events; scale: SRM score; range: 0 - 7; higher SRM scores mean more regular occurance of daily events
changes in SRM scores in week 1, week 2, and week 3
anxiety state
Time Frame: changes from before the light intervention STAI-state sum score at the end of light intervention in week 1, week 2, and week 3
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI - form Y) - 20 state items; scale: STAI-state sum score; range: 20 - 80; higher scores mean a higher subjective current anxiety level
changes from before the light intervention STAI-state sum score at the end of light intervention in week 1, week 2, and week 3
cognitive performance
Time Frame: changes from before the light intervention NLT number of correct answers at the end of light intervention in week 1, week 2, and week 3
The Number Letter Task (NLT) measures task switching performance; scale: number of correct answers; range: integer greater than or equal to 0; higher NLT scores means a better task switching performance
changes from before the light intervention NLT number of correct answers at the end of light intervention in week 1, week 2, and week 3
exam anxiety
Time Frame: changes of multidimensional PAF scale at week 1, week 2, and week 3
German Test Anxiety Inventory (PAF); four-dimensional PAF scale: (a) excitement, (b) concern, (c) interference, and (d) lack of confidence; range for each dimension: 5 - 20; higher scale means higher test anxiety in the corresponding dimension
changes of multidimensional PAF scale at week 1, week 2, and week 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Markus Canazei, PhD, University of Innsbruck

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Stress

Clinical Trials on Bright light intervention

3
Subscribe