- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04909229
Prescription Digital Therapeutic for the Treatment of Insomnia (SLEEP-I)
July 25, 2025 updated by: Yale University
Randomized Controlled Trial Examining Real-World Effectiveness of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for the Treatment of Insomnia
This will be a prospective multi-center controlled trial of 100 patients conducted to assess the real-world effectiveness of a mobile-delivered, prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) device delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia using a novel patient-centered data-sharing platform with linkage to Fitbit for 61 weeks
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to assess the real-world effectiveness of a mobile-delivered, prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) device delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (i.e., Somryst, herein called PEAR-003b) using a novel patient-centered data sharing platform (called Hugo), with linkage to Fitbit (Inspire 2), among 100 patients with chronic insomnia.
Half of the patients with insomnia will receive the PEAR-003b digital therapeutic with linkage to the Hugo platform and Fitbit (Inspire 2) and half of the patients with insomnia will not receive the PDT but will receive a Fitbit and be enrolled in the Hugo platform.
The treatment duration will be 9 weeks with a 21-, 35-, and 61-week follow-up.
All patients will be evaluated at baseline, as well as prompted to complete additional assessments at weeks 9, 21, 35, and 61.
The PEAR-003b intervention will deliver CBT-I via mobile devices as 6 treatment core modules over 9 weeks.
Additionally, the Hugo platform will be used to collect patient-generated engagement data, healthcare utilization outcomes, and patient activity/clinical outcomes.
These real-world data points and trends collected as part of this pilot investigation will help inform a future larger healthcare effectiveness and outcomes research study.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
- Yale-New Haven Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
22 years to 64 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Age between 22-64 years
- English-speaking (both reading and writing in English required)
- Diagnosis of chronic insomnia
- Participant is willing and able to give consent and participate in study
- Participant has an email account or is willing to create one and a smartphone able to download the necessary applications
- Participant is willing and able to use the PDT, the Hugo data sharing platform and the syncable devices (e.g. Fitbit)
- Participant has primary care at YNHH or Mayo Clinic
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Shift work or family/other commitments that interfere with establishment of regular night-time sleep patterns, and if wake/sleep time is outside the ranges of 4:00h - 10:00h (wake time) and 20:00h - 02:00h (bed time)
- Absence of a reliable internet access and smartphone
- A reported diagnosis of psychosis, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, or any medical disorders contraindicated with sleep restriction
- Current involvement in a non-medication treatment program for insomnia (participants are still eligible if they are taking traditional sleep medications)
- Those with untreated co-existing sleep conditions (e.g. sleep apnea)
- Those who have failed CBT for insomnia in the past
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PEAR-003b PDT Intervention
Participants will receive the PEAR-003b digital therapeutic, a Fitbit, and materials on sleep hygiene and healthy sleep tips.
Using the Hugo platform, patient-generated engagement data, healthcare utilization, and patient activity/clinical outcomes for patients with insomnia will also be collected.
|
The PEAR-003b digital therapeutic delivers CBT-I via mobile devices as 6 treatment core modules over 9 weeks.
Patients will receive a Fitbit and receive standard of care
Patients will receive sleep hygiene and healthy sleep tips.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Arm
Participants will receive a Fitbit, and materials on sleep hygiene and healthy sleep tips.
Using the Hugo platform, patient-generated engagement data, healthcare utilization, and patient activity/clinical outcomes for patients with insomnia will also be collected.
|
Patients will receive a Fitbit and receive standard of care
Patients will receive sleep hygiene and healthy sleep tips.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Insomnia Severity
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post randomization
|
Insomnia will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score.
Participants rate the severity of sleep problems (e.g.
problems with sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening), interference with daytime functioning, how noticeable the impairment is to others, distress or concern caused by the sleep problem(s), as well as satisfaction with the current sleep pattern on a 5-point Likert scale.
The ISI's total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 28 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Insomnia Severity
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Insomnia will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score.
Participants rate the severity of sleep problems (e.g.
problems with sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening), interference with daytime functioning, how noticeable the impairment is to others, distress or concern caused by the sleep problem(s), as well as satisfaction with the current sleep pattern on a 5-point Likert scale.
The ISI's total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 28 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Insomnia Severity
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Insomnia will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score.
Participants rate the severity of sleep problems (e.g.
problems with sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening), interference with daytime functioning, how noticeable the impairment is to others, distress or concern caused by the sleep problem(s), as well as satisfaction with the current sleep pattern on a 5-point Likert scale.
The ISI's total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 28 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Insomnia Severity
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Insomnia will be measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score.
Participants rate the severity of sleep problems (e.g.
problems with sleep onset, sleep maintenance, and early morning awakening), interference with daytime functioning, how noticeable the impairment is to others, distress or concern caused by the sleep problem(s), as well as satisfaction with the current sleep pattern on a 5-point Likert scale.
The ISI's total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 28 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Depressive symptoms will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8.
The PHQ-8 is an 8 item 0 to 3 scale questionnaire.
Total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Depressive symptoms will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8.
The PHQ-8 is an 8 item 0 to 3 scale questionnaire.
Total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Depressive symptoms will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8.
The PHQ-8 is an 8 item 0 to 3 scale questionnaire.
Total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Depressive symptoms will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8.
The PHQ-8 is an 8 item 0 to 3 scale questionnaire.
Total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a widely used diagnostic self-report scale that screens, diagnoses, and assesses the severity of anxiety disorder.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 3 = Nearly every day) scale that measures the degree of severity of anxiety over the last 2 weeks with a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating a more severe anxiety.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a widely used diagnostic self-report scale that screens, diagnoses, and assesses the severity of anxiety disorder.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 3 = Nearly every day) scale that measures the degree of severity of anxiety over the last 2 weeks with a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating a more severe anxiety.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a widely used diagnostic self-report scale that screens, diagnoses, and assesses the severity of anxiety disorder.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 3 = Nearly every day) scale that measures the degree of severity of anxiety over the last 2 weeks with a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating a more severe anxiety.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
The General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a widely used diagnostic self-report scale that screens, diagnoses, and assesses the severity of anxiety disorder.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item 0 to 3 (0 = Not at all, 3 = Nearly every day) scale that measures the degree of severity of anxiety over the last 2 weeks with a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with a higher score indicating a more severe anxiety.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used self-reported 10-item questionnaire that assesses how stressful participants believe their life is.
Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores pointing to more perceived stress.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used self-reported 10-item questionnaire that assesses how stressful participants believe their life is.
Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores pointing to more perceived stress.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used self-reported 10-item questionnaire that assesses how stressful participants believe their life is.
Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores pointing to more perceived stress.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Stress
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a widely used self-reported 10-item questionnaire that assesses how stressful participants believe their life is.
Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores pointing to more perceived stress.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Daytime sleepiness is measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) The ESS total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Daytime sleepiness is measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) The ESS total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Daytime sleepiness is measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) The ESS total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Daytime sleepiness is measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) The ESS total score ranges from 0 (not clinically significant) to 24 (clinically significant)
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Healthcare utilization will be reported as the number of outpatient visits with a primary care clinician or specialty care clinician.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Healthcare utilization will be reported as the number of outpatient visits with a primary care clinician or specialty care clinician.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Healthcare utilization will be reported as the number of outpatient visits with a primary care clinician or specialty care clinician.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Healthcare Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Healthcare utilization will be reported as the number of outpatient visits with a primary care clinician or specialty care clinician.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Medication Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Medication utilization will be reported as the number of medication refills for sleep and/or psychotropic medications.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Medication Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Medication utilization will be reported as the number of medication refills for sleep and/or psychotropic medications.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Medication Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Medication utilization will be reported as the number of medication refills for sleep and/or psychotropic medications.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Medication Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Medication utilization will be reported as the number of medication refills for sleep and/or psychotropic medications.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (PCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The physical health component (PCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported physical health.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (PCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The physical health component (PCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported physical health.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (PCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The physical health component (PCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported physical health.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (PCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The physical health component (PCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported physical health.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (MCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The mental health component (MCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported mental health.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (MCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The mental health component (MCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported mental health.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (MCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The mental health component (MCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported mental health.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Quality of Life (MCS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in quality of life as measured in the Short Form 12 (SF-12).
The mental health component (MCS) score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores representing better self-reported mental health.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep efficiency, calculated as time spent sleeping divided by time spent in bed.
This data is acquired from sleep diaries filled out by patient.
(range 0-100 percentage points)
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep efficiency, calculated as time spent sleeping divided by time spent in bed.
This data is acquired from sleep diaries filled out by patient.
(range 0-100 percentage points)
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep efficiency, calculated as time spent sleeping divided by time spent in bed.
This data is acquired from sleep diaries filled out by patient.
(range 0-100 percentage points)
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Efficiency
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep efficiency, calculated as time spent sleeping divided by time spent in bed.
This data is acquired from sleep diaries filled out by patient.
(range 0-100 percentage points)
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep-onset latency (SOL; hour), is based on the participants sleep diary and how many hours it took the participants to fall asleep.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep-onset latency (SOL; hour), is based on the participants sleep diary and how many hours it took the participants to fall asleep.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep-onset latency (SOL; hour), is based on the participants sleep diary and how many hours it took the participants to fall asleep.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Sleep Onset Latency
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Change in sleep-onset latency (SOL; hour), is based on the participants sleep diary and how many hours it took the participants to fall asleep.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Health Utility Score
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
The Short Form 6 dimensions (SF-6D) is a health-related quality-of-life classification system that was developed from the SF-36 health survey (SF-36) and SF-12 health survey (SF-12).
In this study, a scoring method was applied that focuses on seven of the health domains covered by the SF-12: Physical Functioning, Role Limitation (combined Physical and Emotional), Social Functioning, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, and Vitality- to create a single index of health.
The resulting SF-6D is scored from 0.0 (worst measured health state) to 1.0 (best measured health state), with the difference being calculated to determine the change in health utility score for each arm in each time period.
Data presented here is the percent change in score from baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization.
|
From baseline to 9 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Health Utility Score
Time Frame: From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
The Short Form 6 dimensions (SF-6D) is a health-related quality-of-life classification system that was developed from the SF-36 health survey (SF-36) and SF-12 health survey (SF-12).
In this study, a scoring method was applied that focuses on seven of the health domains covered by the SF-12: Physical Functioning, Role Limitation (combined Physical and Emotional), Social Functioning, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, and Vitality- to create a single index of health.
The resulting SF-6D is scored from 0.0 (worst measured health state) to 1.0 (best measured health state), with the difference being calculated to determine the change in health utility score for each arm in each time period.
Data presented here is the percent change in score from baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization.
|
From baseline to 21 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Health Utility Score
Time Frame: From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
The Short Form 6 dimensions (SF-6D) is a health-related quality-of-life classification system that was developed from the SF-36 health survey (SF-36) and SF-12 health survey (SF-12).
In this study, a scoring method was applied that focuses on seven of the health domains covered by the SF-12: Physical Functioning, Role Limitation (combined Physical and Emotional), Social Functioning, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, and Vitality- to create a single index of health.
The resulting SF-6D is scored from 0.0 (worst measured health state) to 1.0 (best measured health state), with the difference being calculated to determine the change in health utility score for each arm in each time period.
Data presented here is the percent change in score from baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization.
|
From baseline to 35 weeks post-randomization
|
|
Change in Health Utility Score
Time Frame: From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
The Short Form 6 dimensions (SF-6D) is a health-related quality-of-life classification system that was developed from the SF-36 health survey (SF-36) and SF-12 health survey (SF-12).
In this study, a scoring method was applied that focuses on seven of the health domains covered by the SF-12: Physical Functioning, Role Limitation (combined Physical and Emotional), Social Functioning, Bodily Pain, Mental Health, and Vitality- to create a single index of health.
The resulting SF-6D is scored from 0.0 (worst measured health state) to 1.0 (best measured health state), with the difference being calculated to determine the change in health utility score for each arm in each time period.
Data presented here is the percent change in score from baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization.
|
From baseline to 61 weeks post-randomization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joseph S Ross, MD MHS, Yale University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 20, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 3, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 24, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
June 1, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 28, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 25, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2000029050
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Once the study has been completed, IPD will be shared in a way which will protect patient confidentiality using a data sharing platform for research purposes.
The exact plan has yet to be decided.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available once the study has been completed
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Insomnia Chronic
-
University of PennsylvaniaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteNot yet recruitingInsomnia | Chronic Insomnia | Insomnia Disorder | Chronic Insomnia DisorderUnited States
-
San Francisco Neurology and Sleep CenterNot yet recruitingInsomnia | Sleep Disturbance | Chronic Insomnia | Chronic Insomnia DisorderUnited States
-
Jun SongUnknown
-
University of ManitobaCompleted
-
Aarhus University HospitalTrygFonden, Denmark; EnversionRecruitingInsomnia ChronicDenmark
-
University of AarhusTrygFonden, Denmark; Enversion A/SCompleted
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyNot yet recruitingChronic Insomnia During Perimenopause and Menopause
-
Duke UniversityCompleted
-
Posit Science CorporationCompletedInsomnia ChronicUnited States
-
University of TromsoUniversity Hospital of North Norway; Diakonhjemmet HospitalRecruitingPain, Chronic | Insomnia Chronic | Insomnia Due to Medical ConditionNorway
Clinical Trials on PEAR-003b PDT Intervention
-
SanofiCompletedPertussis | Tetanus | Diphtheria | PoliomyelitisKorea, Republic of
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)RecruitingRecurrent Colorectal Carcinoma | Locally Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma | Stage III Colorectal CancerUnited States