Safety and Performance of Ultra/Ultra 3D Cl With HiFocus SlimJ Electrode in Adults With Severe-to-profound Hearing Loss

March 4, 2024 updated by: Advanced Bionics AG

Clinical Investigation of the Safety and Performance of HiResTM Ultra Cl HiFocusTM SlimJ Electrode (Cl-1600-05) and HiResTM Ultra 3D Cl HiFocusTM SlimJ Electrode (Cl-1601-05) (Ultra X) in Adults With Severe-to-profound Hearing Loss

This is a prospective study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the HiResTM Ultra Cl HiFocusTM SlimJ Electrode and HiResTM Ultra 3D Cl HiFocusTM SlimJ Electrode (Ultra X) under normal conditions of use as it is approved for this device. Participants receive interventions as part of routine medical care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is set up to document any adverse events and comparing pre- to post-implant benefit to subjects. Any adverse events associated with the device will be documented via Advanced Bionics complaint handling system for the lifetime of the device. A within-subjects repeated-measures design will be employed. Speech perception will be evaluated preoperatively with conventional amplification to determine candidacy and to establish baseline performance. Efficacy parameters are speech perception data which will be collected according to clinical routine with a 6 month follow up period. Subjects will be implanted unilaterally with the Ultra X according to standard clinical care.

The primary efficacy objective is to demonstrate that mean monosyllabic word recognition score with the Ultra X used in combination with a sound processor programmed with the latest fitting software six months after activation is at least 20% better than the mean word score at baseline with conventional amplification in the same ear.

The primary efficacy endpoint is reached six months after device activation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 12683
        • Recruiting
        • Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin (UKB)
        • Contact:
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
      • Münster, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
        • Contact:
          • Katrin Neumann, Prof.
        • Contact:
          • Claudia Rudack, Prof.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

30 adult subjects with valid and useable data

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No previous experience with any auditory implant
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Postlingual onset of severe hearing loss (≥ 4 years of age)
  • Limited benefit from appropriately fitted hearing aids, defined as scoring 60% or less in Freiburger Monosyllabic word test
  • German language proficiency
  • Willingness to participate in all scheduled procedures outlined in the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cochlear malformation or obstruction that would preclude full insertion of electrode array.
  • Presence of additional disabilities that would prevent or interfere with participation in the required study procedures
  • Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate surgery or impact the ability to manage an implanted device or the study related procedures
  • Evidence of central auditory lesion or compromised auditory nerve
  • Pregnancy at time of surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Speech recognition score (word score)
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary efficacy objective is to demonstrate that mean monosyllabic word recognition score (Minimum Score 0 percent and maximum score 100 percent wheras 0 percent is worse and 100 is better) with the Ultra implants used in combination with a sound processor programmed with the latest fitting software is at least 20 percent better than the mean monosyllabic word score at baseline with conventional amplification in the same ear.
6 months
Analysis of participants with device failure
Time Frame: 6 months
A maximum of one device failure that require device replacement during the first six months following device activation (activation approximately one to eight weeks after surgery).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analysis of Speech reception threshold
Time Frame: 6 months
50 percent speech reception threshold in the Oldenburger Sentence Test (OlSa) in noise in the implanted ear six months after device activation compared to baseline performance with conventional amplification in the same ear.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device fitting data
Time Frame: 6 months
M-level [CU] CU=Clinical Units
6 months
Device verification data
Time Frame: 6 months
Impedances [Kilo Ohm]
6 months
Professional feedback from the audiologist using the latest fitting software to program the latest processor
Time Frame: 6 months
Feedback will be collected with a structured questionnaire
6 months
Feedback from the surgeon on handling of the device and tools during implantation
Time Frame: 6 months
Feedback will be collected with a structured questionnaire
6 months
hours of usage
Time Frame: 6 months
hours of usage as summarized in the logging of the processor
6 months
using habits of participants
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessement with a structured patient questionnaire
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arneborg Ernst, Prof. Dr., Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cochlear Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on cochlear implantation

3
Subscribe