Predicting Fluid Responsiveness During Shock in Newborns and Infants by End-expiratory Occlusion Test (EVEOC)

March 26, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness During Shock State by End-expiratory Occlusion Test in Newborns and Infants : EVEOC Study

To date, the end-expiratory occlusion test in infants or children has never been evaluated as a marker of preload dependence. It therefore appears clinically relevant to evaluate this new indicator to predict fluid responsiveness in all infants hospitalized in pediatric and neonatal intensive care.

The main objective of this study is to determine whether the hemodynamic effects of a 15-second end-expiratory occlusion were able to predict fluid responsiveness in the mechanically ventilated infant or newborn in pediatric intensive care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Volume expansion remains one of the first resuscitation treatments for states of shock. Nonetheless, the decision to perform volume expansion should be based on a "functional" hemodynamic assessment, i.e., filling should only be performed if changes in cardiac preload result in significant changes in stroke volume. This is then referred to as preload dependency. Unnecessary volume expansion induces fluid overload and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality for shock conditions in infant and children.

In addition, several studies in adults and children have demonstrated the lack of effectiveness of so-called "static" preload variables as witnesses of preload dependence. Only "dynamic" preload variables, based on the notion of cardiopulmonary interaction during mechanical ventilation, can predict this preload dependence, however with very variable sensitivities and specificities depending on the studies.

The end-expiratory occlusion test is a dynamic preload dependency test that can be performed in patients on invasive ventilation. The test consists in interrupting the ventilator at end-expiration for 15 seconds, delaying the next insufflation thus allowing an increase in venous return to the right heart and then to the left heart. If the heart is preload dependent, an increase in venous return is accompanied by an increase in stroke volume and cardiac output (Franck-Starling's law). Volume expansion is usually considered effective or positive if cardiac output increases by more than 15% from baseline.

To date, the end-expiratory occlusion test in infants or children has never been evaluated as a marker of preload dependence. It therefore appears clinically relevant to evaluate this new indicator to predict fluid responsiveness in all infants hospitalized in pediatric and neonatal intensive care.

The main objective of this study is to determine whether the hemodynamic effects of a 15-second end-expiratory occlusion were able to predict fluid responsiveness in the mechanically ventilated infant or newborn in pediatric intensive care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Hôpital Armand Trousseau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborn and infant <2 years.
  • Born at or near term (> 36 weeks of amenorrhea).
  • Hospitalized in pediatric and neonatal intensive care.
  • Requiring the use of invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • In a state of shock defined by a cardio-circulatory dysfunction associating arterial hypotension, an alteration in organ perfusion, one or more organ dysfunctions or vasopressor's requirement. Clinical signs retained: heart rate ≥ 90th percentile associated with at least one sign of peripheral hypoperfusion represented by a a capillary refill time ≥ 3sec, or the presence of mottling or coldness of the extremities or urine output ≤ 0.5ml / kg / h or disturbance of consciousness.
  • The practitioner in charge of the patient has decided to perform volume expansion.
  • Non-opposition expressed by the holders of parental authority.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any serious and urgent clinical hemodynamic situation, the management of which would be delayed by inclusion in the protocol.
  • Patient with unoperated congenital heart disease.
  • Patient in spontaneous or non-invasive ventilation or with spontaneous ventilatory cycles in invasive ventilation.
  • Patient in prolonged cardiac arrest (> 5min) or refractory.
  • Patient under venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
  • Refusal of the holders of parental authority to exploit the collected data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients
Patients less than 2 years old admitted in the pediatric intensive care unit of the Armand-Trousseau hospital, under invasive mechanical ventilation and in whom a volume expansion is planned by the attending physicians.
The test consists in interrupting the ventilator at end-expiration for 15 seconds and assessing the resulting changes in cardiac output. Delays necessary to allow sufficient pulmonary transit time to allow good pulmonary venous return and therefore an increase in cardiac preload.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac output
Time Frame: 25 minutes

Cardiac output measured by cardiac ultrasound before and during end-expiratory occlusion and after volume expansion.

A positive response to end-expiratory occlusion is defined as an increase in cardiac output ≥ 15%.

A positive response to the volume expansion test is defined as an increase in cardiac output ≥ 15%.

25 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate
Time Frame: 25 minutes
Heart rate measured by cardiac ultrasound before and during end-expiratory pause and after volume expansion.
25 minutes
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: 25 minutes
Recorded using a bedside monitor before and during end-expiratory pause and after volume expansion.
25 minutes
Arterial pulse pressure
Time Frame: 25 minutes

Pressure waveform analysis was performed online with the soft tracing provided by the monitor.

∆PP (%) = PP max-PP min)/[(PP max+PP min)/2] × 100).

25 minutes
Stroke volume
Time Frame: 25 minutes
Measured by cardiac ultrasound before and during end-expiratory pause and after volume expansion.
25 minutes
Aortic velocity time integral
Time Frame: 25 minutes
Measured by cardiac ultrasound before and during end-expiratory pause and after volume expansion.
25 minutes
Aortic blood flow velocity
Time Frame: 25 minutes
Measured by cardiac ultrasound before and during end-expiratory pause and after volume expansion.
25 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yaël LEVY, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
  • Study Director: Pierre-Louis LEGER, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP201320
  • ID RCB 2020-A02 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shock

Clinical Trials on End-expiratory occlusion test

Subscribe