- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03820440
End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Lung Recruitment Maneuver to Assess Fluid responsiVeness In Surgical Patients (ELVIS)
End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Lung Recruitment Maneuver to Assess Fluid responsiVeness In Surgical Patients: an Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial
The functional hemodynamic test (FHT) called passive leg raising (PLR) has been successfully used for assessing the fluid responsiveness in ICU patients since 2009 and its reliability has been confirmed by three large meta-analyses. However, the PLR is not usually practicable in the OR.
A lot of different FHTs have been proposed, as alternative to the PLR, in ICU and, more recently, OR. These tests could be basically subdivided in two groups. A subgroup of FHTs is based on sudden and brief variations of the mechanical ventilation to induce a change in right ventricle preload and/or after load and, as consequence, of left ventricle SV. A second subgroup aims at testing the increase in SV after the rapid administration of a small aliquot of the predefined FC.
Among the first group, the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and the lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) have been previously successfully tested in surgical patients. The EEOT consists of the interruption of the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, whereas the LRM consists in the increase in the peak inspiratory pressure up to 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds and in the assessment of the changes in the SV after the maneuvers. These tests are safe and can be easily applicable during the surgery to predict fluid responsiveness and optimize the fluid therapy.
The primary aim of the present study is to compare the reliability of EEOT and LRM in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Targeted fluid therapy has received increasing attention in the management of patients showing acute circulatory failure in both intensive care unit (ICU) and operating room (OR), aiming at preventing both inadequate tissue blood flow and fluid overload [1]. In fact, unnecessary fluid administration can increase morbidity and mortality and length of hospital stay of critically ill and surgical patients [2-10].
Since the only physiological reason to give a fluid challenge (FC) is to increase the stroke volume (SV) [11-13] and this effect is obtained only in about 50% of ICU and OR patients [14, 15], a vast literature investigated the possibility of predict this effect before FC administration, but the issue remains extremely challenging [1, 13, 16-18]. Bedside clinical signs and pressure and static volumetric static variables, do not predict fluid responsiveness [17]. Moreover, several physiological factors affect the reliability of the ventilator-induced dynamic changes in pulse pressure and stroke volume [pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), respectively], and their echographic surrogates, in a significant number of ICU and OR patients [19-22].
To overcome these limitations, the functional hemodynamic assessment (i.e. the assessment of the dynamic interactions of hemodynamic variables in response to a defined perturbation), of fluid responsiveness has gained in popularity [17, 18, 23]. A functional hemodynamic test (FHT) consist in a manoeuvre determining a sudden change in cardiac function and/or heart lung interaction, affecting the hemodynamics of fluid responders and non-responders to a different extent [17, 18, 23].
The FHT called passive leg raising (PLR) has been successfully used for assessing the fluid responsiveness in ICU patients since 2009 [24] and its reliability has been confirmed by three large meta-analyses [25-27]. However, the PLR is not usually practicable in the OR.
A lot of different FHTs have been proposed, as alternative to the PLR, in ICU and, more recently, OR. These tests could be basically subdivided in two groups. A subgroup of FHTs is based on sudden and brief variations of the mechanical ventilation to induce a change in right ventricle preload and/or after load and, as consequence, of left ventricle SV [24, 28]. A second subgroup aims at testing the increase in SV after the rapid administration of a small aliquot of the predefined FC [29, 30].
Among the first group, the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and the lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) have been previously successfully tested in surgical patients [31-33]. The EEOT consists of the interruption of the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, whereas the LRM consists in the increase in the peak inspiratory pressure up to 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds and in the assessment of the changes in the SV after the maneuvers. These tests are safe and can be easily applicable during the surgery to predict fluid responsiveness and optimize the fluid therapy.
The primary aim of the present study is to compare the reliability of EEOT and LRM in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general surgery.
(for Bibliography please refer to the original protocol)
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Milano
-
Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
- Humanitas Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years;
- Scheduled for elective supine abdominal surgery and requiring invasive arterial monitoring;
- Glasgow coma scale 15 at recruitment. All the patients must be able to sign an informed consent at the admission.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any recurrent cardiac arrhythmias;
- Reduced left (ejection fraction <30%) or right (systolic peak velocity of tricuspid annular motion <0.17 m/s) ventricular systolic function;
- Chronic use beta-blocking agents.
- History of pneumothorax.
- BMI > 40
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Treatment - hemodynamic tests
Treatment - hemodynamic tests: The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator. The LRM is performed by using a single act of mechanical ventilation in pressure-controlled mode at 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds |
The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator.
The LRM is performed by using a single act of mechanical ventilation in pressure-controlled mode at 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
AUC difference
Time Frame: 10 minutes after fluid challenge administration
|
To assess the difference in the area under (AUC) the receiving operator characteristic curve (ROC)
|
10 minutes after fluid challenge administration
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Frame: 10 minutes after fluid challenge administration
|
ROC curve analysis to assess the sensitivity and specificity of EEOT and LRM in predicting fluid responsiveness.
|
10 minutes after fluid challenge administration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Biais M, Larghi M, Henriot J, de Courson H, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K. End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Protective Ventilation in the Operating Room. Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1889-1895. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002322.
- Biais M, Lanchon R, Sesay M, Le Gall L, Pereira B, Futier E, Nouette-Gaulain K. Changes in Stroke Volume Induced by Lung Recruitment Maneuver Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Operating Room. Anesthesiology. 2017 Feb;126(2):260-267. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001459.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- ELVIS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgery
-
3MRecruitingAbdominal Surgery | Orthopedic Surgery | Vascular Surgery | Cardiovascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedHand Surgery | Wrist Surgery | Forearm Surgery | Elbow SurgeryUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedGynecological Surgery | Plastic Surgery | ENT SurgeryFrance
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAbdominal Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Non-Cardiac/ Non-Thoracic Surgery | Major Peripheral Vascular SurgeryUnited States
-
Maquet Cardiopulmonary GmbHNAMSARecruitingCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | Thoracic Surgery | Vascular SurgerySpain
-
Baylor Research InstituteChiesi USA, Inc.RecruitingSurgery | Cardiac Surgery | Surgery--Complications | Percutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityEdwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Surgery | Thoracic Surgery | Heart Surgery | Heart Transplant
-
Poudre Valley Health SystemTerminatedSurgery | Surgery--ComplicationsUnited States
-
EgymedicalpediaCompletedSurgery | Pediatric SurgeryEgypt
-
Surgify Medical OyCompletedSurgery | Spine SurgeryFinland
Clinical Trials on End-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT)
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Completed
-
Humanitas Clinical and Research CenterCompletedSurgery | Anesthesia | Hemodynamic InstabilityItaly
-
Mongi Slim HospitalCompletedUltrasonography | Intensive Care Units | Blood VolumeTunisia
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruiting
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandCompletedSurgery | General Anesthesia | Hemodynamic Instability | Protective Mechanical VentilationFrance
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Complications | Cardiac Surgery | Fluid OverloadEgypt
-
Bhumibol Adulyadej HospitalNot yet recruitingFluid Responsiveness
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromeFrance
-
Bicetre HospitalCompletedSeptic Shock | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Hemodynamic InstabilityFrance
-
Hospital Italiano de Buenos AiresSanatorio Anchorena San Martin; Centro de Educación Medica e Investigaciones... and other collaboratorsRecruitingRespiratory Failure | Weaning FailureArgentina