Testing Informed Decision Making in Lung Cancer Screening (TIDiL)

September 7, 2023 updated by: Heather Bittner Fagan, Christiana Care Health Services
Lung cancer screening rates are very low despite the fact that lung cancer screening could save many lives. People need to understand the risks and benefits to screening as well as their own beliefs about screening. This study builds an intervention in real world primary care that will help people make the right decision for them as well as help people to quit smoking. Interventions like this are needed to improve the screening rate and reduce death from lung cancer, which is the leading cancer killer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Lung cancer screening rates in the United States are very low- just 3.3% in 2010 and 3.9% in 2015. There is a critical need to develop and implement effective strategies to engage high-risk patients in a coordinated program of lung cancer screening, which includes shared-decision making. The investigators proposed to modify and expand a shared decision- counseling intervention previously developed in one primary care practice. The investigators measured lung cancer screening in our intervention group compared to a propensity-matched usual care cohort. The investigators compared patients recruited to patients who are not in order to identify potential sources of disparity in future work and the investigators developed a more intense smoking cessation component. Model interventions for shared-decision making in clinical practice are needed across a wide range of diseases and decisions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19718
        • Christiana Care Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current or former smoker
  • Greater than or equal to 30 pack years smoking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior CT in last year
  • Quit smoking greater than 15 years ago
  • Current diagnosis of lung cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phone-delivered decision-counseling program for shared decision making in lung cancer screening
All individuals who are eligible for lung cancer screening according to USPSTF criteria were invited to participate in the study and all patients who accepted the invitation and consented were slated to receive the intervention which was a phone-delivered on line decision-counseling program (DCP) and there was no one randomized or enrolled into a control group, nor was anyone randomized or enrolled into a usual care group.
Telephone delivered non-persuasive shared decision-making for lung cancer screening.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Who Received a Low Dose CT Scan of the Chest
Time Frame: 1 year
Percentage of individuals who have evidence of a low-dose CT scan of the chest in their electronic medical record at 1 year post intervention, as ascertained by chart audit by research assistance.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather B Fagan, MD, Christiana Care Health Services

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 603913
  • U54GM104941 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Pending data analytic support to de-identify data, will share entire study data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Shared Decision Making

Subscribe