ENhancing Outcomes Through Goal Assessment and Generating Engagement in Diabetes Mellitus (ENGAGE-DM)

September 9, 2019 updated by: AstraZeneca

ENhancing Outcomes Through Goal Assessment and Generating Engagement in Diabetes Mellitus (ENGAGE-DM): A 12-month Study of the Impact of Combined Shared-decision Making and Brief Negotiated Interviewing on Disease Control and Medication Adherence in Patients With Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a combination of pharmacist-delivered patient engagement techniques improves disease control and medication adherence among patients with poorly-controlled diabetes compared with usual care. These engagement techniques include shared decision-making and brief negotiated interviewing and are delivered telephonically.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The US is facing a growing epidemic of type 2 diabetes. Among patients with poorly controlled diabetes, it is often not clear whether the problem is attributable to failure to appropriately intensify therapy, poor adherence to prescribed medications, unwillingness to accept new treatments or a combination of these factors. Multi-component pharmacist-delivered interventions, particularly those rooted in patient engagement, have been shown to be some of the most effective at improving adherence to chronic disease medications. Even though shared decision making and brief negotiated interviewing are complementary patient engagement techniques, the effectiveness of combining these 2 intervention approaches, especially in the management of diabetes, is unknown.

In this study of patients using at least one oral hypoglycemic therapy with poorly controlled disease, the investigators examine the impact of a shared decision making and behavioral interviewing intervention delivered telephonically by pharmacists, compared with usual care. Briefly, all patients allocated to the intervention will be mailed a patient decision aid to prime them for encounters with pharmacists. After receiving the decision aid, these patients will be asked to engage in and provide informed consent for at least 4 telephonic discussions with pharmacists about their diabetes treatment options, goals, and preferences, medication adherence, strategies for reducing adherence barriers, and the benefits of maintaining blood glucose control. The study is being conducted within a large insurer and consists of 700 patients each allocated to the intervention group and the control group. Analyses will be performed on an intent-to-treat basis.

After study completion, the investigators will also use predictive analytics to examine whether treatment response could be predicted based on patient characteristics, such as sociodemographic, clinical, medication use, and other motivational characteristics, which will provide information about which patients are most likely to benefit from the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1400

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 2115
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 130 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion:

  • Commercially-insured beneficiaries
  • Receive all medical/prescription drug benefits through Horizon
  • On ≥1 one oral hypoglycemic agent
  • Latest HbA1c measurement ≥ 8% (within previous 6 months)
  • Provided phone number to Horizon

Exclusion:

- Currently using any insulin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Shared Decision Making/Brief Negotiated Interviewing
This prospective study will include 700 beneficiaries of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (BCBSNJ).
This prospective study will include 700 beneficiaries of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (BCBSNJ).
No Intervention: Control Arm
Seven hundred patients will also be identified by Horizon Analytics as a control group for analyses purposes only; these patients will not be contacted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c):
Time Frame: baseline and at the end of 12 months post index date
Pre- to post-intervention change in mean HbA1c levels
baseline and at the end of 12 months post index date

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication Adherence (PDC Measure)
Time Frame: during follow-up period of 12 months post index date
Mean Adherence (PDC) in each study arm in the follow-up period
during follow-up period of 12 months post index date
Percentage (Proportion x 100) of Patients Achieving Optimal Adherence
Time Frame: during follow-up period of 12 months post index date
Percentage (Proportion x 100) of patients in each study arm achieving optimal adherence (PDC ≥0.80) in the follow-up period
during follow-up period of 12 months post index date
Patients Achieving HbA1c
Time Frame: baseline and at the end of 12 months post index date
Percentage (Proportion x 100) of patients in each study arm achieving optimal HbA1c control in the follow-up period
baseline and at the end of 12 months post index date

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eric Wittbrodt, PharmD, MPH, AstraZeneca
  • Principal Investigator: Niteesh K. Choudhry, MD, Ph.D, Brigham Women's Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Clinical Trials on Shared Decision Making

3
Subscribe