Value of Manual Therapy Specificity Referred to Pain Intensity in Patients With Subacute and Unspecified Low Back Pain

December 10, 2021 updated by: Alexander Achalandabaso, University of Jaén

The Importance of Manual Therapy Specificity Referred to Pain Intensity in Patients With Subacute and Unspecified Low Back Pain

This study proves the specificity of manual therapy in unspecified an subacute low back pain

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to determine the importance of manual therapy specificity in relation to subacute low back pain.

In order to do this, it will be selected a sample of at least 48 people who suffer low back pain whose duration has not exceeded 12 weeks. Patients will be divided into two groups and a different physiotherapist from the one who will subsequently perform the intervention, will assess and determine which is the most painful segment in each of them.

In the first group, the intervention to be carried out will be through posteroanterior (PA) vertebral mobilizations in the most painful lumbar segment. The members of the second group will undergo this same technique on a painful segment of the region adjacent to the one they have referred as the main source of pain.

Each of these sessions will continue until the patient's symptoms have decreased two points on the numerical scale of pain. There will be one session per week, for six weeks.

To determine the differences between the two groups, there will be carried out 4 measurements of pain, functional disability, quality of life and kinesiophobia, and 3 measurements of pressure pain threshold were performed. Each one of them will be carried out in the first session, in the third week of treatment, in the last session of the treatment and one month after the end of the treatment. The last measeurement will be executed online and that is why the pressure pain threshold will be measured three times while the rest will be do it.

The hypothesis is that it won´t be differences in the amount of pain between the tratment on the main painful segment and the treatment on his adyacent segment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Universidad de Alcala

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • People aged between 18 and 65 years old with unspecific and subacute low back pain.
  • Participants must be capable of walking twice a week 20 minutes per day.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with history of spinal surgeries, osteoporosis and tumor.
  • Pregnant and people with severe respiratory and cardiac illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PA mobilizations on their main painfull vertebral segment
Patients who will be treated with PA mobilizations on their main painfull vertebral segment.
A PA mobilization is a technique in which one vertebra slides over another due to a force applied with the hands of the physiotherapist
Experimental: PA mobilizations on an adjacent vertebral segment from the most painful
Patients who will be treated with PA mobilizations on an adjacent vertebral segment from the most painful.
A PA mobilization is a technique in which one vertebra slides over another due to a force applied with the hands of the physiotherapist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). In this scale patients rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Using SF-36.This scale is made up of 36 items divided into 8 sections. The result can range from 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible health condition and 100 is the best one.
Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Change in Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Using the tampa scale for kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to measure fear of movement, pain and injury relapse. The result can range from 11-44 points where higher scores indicate greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Change in Disability
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).The final score of this scale ranges from 0-100. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound
Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 10 weeks after intervention beginning.
Change in Pressure Pain Threshold
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks after intervention beginning.
Using an Algometer. This is an instrument for measuring sensitivity to pressure or to pain
Baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks after intervention beginning.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEIM/HU/2020/6/56

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on PA vertebral mobilization

Subscribe