Passive Vertebral Mobilization and Propriocemptive Neuromuscular Techniques in Mechanical Neck Pain

Comparison Between Passive Vertebral Mobilization and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques in Managing Pain and Disability in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Passive Vertebral Mobilization (PVM) and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques (PNF) in reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life in patients with Mechanical Neck Pain.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Mechanical Neck Pain
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Passive Vertebral Mobilization; Other: Routine Physiotherapy; Other: PNF exercise

Detailed Description

Neck Pain is very common and is now considered a public health issue. It poses significant health and economic burden, being a frequent cause of disability. A significant proportion of direct health care costs associated with neck disorders are attributable to visits to health care providers, to sick leave, and to the related loss of productive capacity. Mechanical neck pain affects between 45-54% of people in the general population .This can result in severe pain and disability. Mechanical neck pain described as a reduction in the mobility of cervical spinal segment is often the focus of manipulative physical therapy interventions. Most neck pain is not attributed to diseases but rather caused by muscular and postural condition. The cervical pain is a mechanical problem .It is therefore sense that a mechanical treatment works better than pharmacological treatment.

Cervical spine often impairs flexibility of key muscles related to cervical spine . Stretching exercise is beneficial for increasing flexibility as well as muscle performance.

The normal function of cervical spine is complex and requires a large variety of activities to be coordinated in order for an individual to perform daily activities with the least amount of strain and potential injury. When the dysfunction develops in the cervical spine, a chain reaction may develop which can affect the whole neck and even the entire body.

Commonly used approaches to treatment include rest, therapeutic massage, application of physical agents like heat, cold, TENS, and ultrasonic various types of mobilizations, manipulations (by physical therapists, chiropractors, osteopaths and others), therapeutic exercises, postural care and off course medication and surgical interventions. However, studies of their effectiveness have generally been short-term and inconclusive. The aim of the study is to compare which treatment either Passive Vertebral Mobilization or Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, whether itself or in combination, is more effective and beneficial in the treatment of mechanical neck pain.

Several studies have been reported to determine the effectiveness of manual therapy/ passive vertebral mobilization but with largely inconclusive results. However there are few studies if any to compare PNF exercise with PVM in terms of their effectiveness. PNF are simple and requiring low level expertise as compare to PVM.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 90
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with mechanical neck pain having limited range of motion and muscle spasm and difficulty function between 18 to 60 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, Ankylosing spondylitis or other systemic disease
• Patients with cancer of the cervical spine
• Patients with history of fracture of spine
• Patients with any congenital anomaly of Cervical spine
• Patients having whiplash disorder with in last four weeks

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PVM group; This group included 30 participants. Passive vertebral mobilization was given along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care	Other: Passive Vertebral Mobilization; Posteroanterior glides was given to cervical spine using Maitland method along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care; Other Names: Spinal mobilization; Other: Routine Physiotherapy; Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care; Other Names: Routine Physical therapy (RPT)
Active Comparator: PNF group; This group included 30 participants. PNF exercise in the form of diagonal pattern neck movements was along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care	Other: Routine Physiotherapy; Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care; Other Names: Routine Physical therapy (RPT); Other: PNF exercise; The subjects was given PNF exercises comprising PNF diagonal patterns for neck along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care; Other Names: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Active Comparator: RPT(Routine Physiotherapy) group; This group included 30 participants.Routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care.	Other: Routine Physiotherapy; Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care; Other Names: Routine Physical therapy (RPT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (PAIN)	changes from baseline. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm horizontal line, with 0 presenting No pain and 10 representing Worst Pain.	4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Flexion)	changes from baseline	4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Extension)	changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position	4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (rotation rightward)	changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position	4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (rotation leftward)	changes from baseline. Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position	4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Side bending Right)	changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position	4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Side bending Left)	changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position	4 weeks
Neck Flexors Muscle endurance	changes from baseline. Neck Flexion holding time in supine lying position was measured in seconds with the help of stop watch.	4 weeks
NDI (neck Disability Index)	changes from baseline NDI is self rated index to measure pain and disability due to neck pain. Neck disability index consists of 10 questions addressing functional activities. There are 6 potential responses for each item, ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5).The NDI is scored from 0 to 50 with higher score indication greater disability.	4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Isra University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Muhammad Ashfaq, Isra University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Ashfaq M, Babur MN, Malick WH, Hussain MA, Awan WA. Comparative effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and passive vertebral mobilization for neck disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jul;31:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 20, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 30, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): March 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 13, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 21, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): January 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 11, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 10, 2021
• Last Verified: March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Quality of Life; Pain; Disability; Mechanical Neck Pain; Passive Vertebral Mobilization; Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques (PNF)
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Neck Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: 1402-PhD-003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No