Engaging Patients in Mutual Goal-Setting in Hospitalized Patients

May 19, 2022 updated by: Teresa Jerofke-Owen, Marquette University
Mutual goal setting and action planning in patients with long-term conditions in outpatient settings is associated with favorable effects on measures of physical health, psychological health, subjective health status, self-management self-efficacy levels, activation levels, and perceived empowerment. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of an educational intervention delivered to the staff nurses of two surgical units on how to engage patients in mutual goal-setting in the acute care setting. Staff nurses from two 32-bed surgical units will be scheduled to attend an hour-long educational intervention. A total of 630 chart audits will be conducted one month prior and one and three months following the intervention per unit, to examine the number of patients with a daily goal recorded in the prior 24 hours and the quality of the recorded goal using the SMART-GEM. The self-efficacy of engaging in mutual goal-setting with patients will be examined by asking nurses to complete the Appraisal Inventory Tool (AIT) prior to and immediately following the intervention. The patient experience of engaging in mutual goal-setting will be examined by having a total of 165 patients complete the Patient Experience of Mutual Goal-Setting Tool (PEMGST) one month prior to the intervention and one and three months following the intervention on each of the two units.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Recruiting
        • Froedtert Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Kristi Opper, MSN
          • Phone Number: 414-454-7357
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Teresa Jerofke-Owen, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • At least 18 years of age or older
  • Must be alert and oriented to person, place, and time
  • Inpatient on one of two included units

Exclusion Criteria

  • Less than 24 hour length of stay
  • Non English-speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No Intervention
Patients receiving usual care
Experimental: Intervention
Patient's receiving care following nurse education on mutual goal-setting
Nurses will receive both written and verbal instruction on mutual goal-setting with patients using SMART methodology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in percentage of charts reviewed with an individualized goal recorded in the electronic health record
Time Frame: Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention
percentage of charts reviewed with individualized goals recorded in their electronic health record
Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of goals as measured by the SMART-GEM.
Time Frame: Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention
Quality of charted individualized goals using talhe SMART-GEM tool. The SMART-GEM (Bowman, Mogensen, Marsland, & Lannin, 2015) is an objective tool that can be used to score the quality of a SMART goal. The interrater agreement on total scores was very good (ICC=.0895, 95% CI = .743 to .986, p=.001) with excellent internal consistency (alpha = .995).
Over the course of one month before delivery of education intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention
Change in patient experience with mutual goal-setting using the Patient Experience of Mutual Goal-Setting Tool.
Time Frame: Over the course of one month before delivery of educational intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention
Patient experience with mutual goal setting using the Patient Experience of Mutual Goal-Setting Tool, a 5-item survey created by PI to measure the patient experience of mutual goal-setting (involvement, satisfaction, knowledge, feeling heard, achievement of goals). Questions are on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a more favorable experience.
Over the course of one month before delivery of educational intervention and one and three months post delivery of intervention
Change in nurse self-efficacy participating in mutual goal-setting with patients pre and post-intervention using the Appraisal Inventory Tool.
Time Frame: Immediately before starting the educational intervention and immediately following the conclusion of the educational intervention
Nurse self-efficacy participating in mutual goal-setting with patients. The Appraisal Inventory Tool is a 5-item survey created by PI to measure nurse self-efficacy for mutual goal-setting using Bandura's (2006) guidelines. The items use an 11-point Likert scale, and higher scores indicate a higher self-efficacy score
Immediately before starting the educational intervention and immediately following the conclusion of the educational intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HR-3725

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Goals

Clinical Trials on Mutual Goal-Setting Education

Subscribe