Cognitive Support Technology for Postsecondary Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder

July 19, 2021 updated by: Kent State University

Cognitive Support Technology for Postsecondary Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial at the Intervention Efficacy Stage of Research

This study will fill important knowledge gaps in the availability of best practices that use innovative methods to integrate the cognitive and vocational needs of students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) who will be transitioning from 2- and 4-year postsecondary education to employment. Best practices exist from the assistive technology (AT) field to help people compensate for cognitive impairments, and from the vocational rehabilitation (VR) field to enhance employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities. However, these practices have not been integrated to provide needed supports and services to improve the employment outcomes of students with ASD. The study's goal is to expand the availability of innovative practices by testing the efficacy of a technology-driven, long-term, and resource-rich individualized support program that merges assistive technology for cognition and vocational rehabilitation practices. The end products will include technology application guidelines, training and procedural manuals, and resource information that rehabilitation professionals and students with ADS can utilize to enhance technology and mentoring proficiency, academic success, self-determination, and long-term career success for students with ASD.

The knowledge to be gained from this research will have a beneficial impact on students with ASD, rehabilitation professionals, higher education personnel, case managers, and employers who work with people with ASD. There is strong potential for the students to develop skills that will help them succeed in learning as well as employment settings. The ultimate benefit of research activities for the target population will be seen in the improved capacity for postsecondary students with ADS to utilize state-of-the-art technology to accommodate disability-related limitations, address career readiness, and to prepare for and obtain employment after graduation.

Because the risks to subjects are no greater than those associated with everyday life and because the study staff will refer students who are in psychological distress or medical emergency situations to appropriate resources in the community, the minimal risks of this study justify the considerable benefits that this study will yield. Not only will the study benefit participating students, it stands to make important contributions to the knowledge bases in the fields of assistive technology and rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Kent, Ohio, United States, 44242-0001
        • Recruiting
        • Kent State University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be a post-secondary student enrolled in degree programs at two-year and four-year colleges or universities within a 60-mile radius of Kent, Ohio
  • Must have a clinical diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No other exclusion criteria will be applied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Full Treatment
Steps of the Intervention Condition. Following an in-person session in which a pretest assessment is completed, each member of the intervention group will participate in three face-to-face sessions with the interventionist at the student's campus or at the interventionist's office to complete the CST component of the intervention. Taking into consideration available psychoeducational assessment data, functional assessments from other agencies, and the participant's self-report regarding the functional difficulties that result from his or her ASD-related cognitive impairments, Scherer's (2012) Matching Person and Technology (MPT) protocol will guide the CST assessment. For purposes of the CST component of this intervention, the technological platform for cognitive accommodations will be an iPad II that is provided to each intervention-group participant at no charge (including wireless access if needed). The interventionist will provide training in the use of the iPad if necessary.
Cognitive Support Technology (CST) products and strategies are used to help people with disabilities compensate for or accommodate cognitive limitations (including those related to interpersonal communication and social cognition) that present difficulties for them in the performance of desired social roles, especially education and employment. CSTs may be mainstream everyday technologies such as tablet computers or they may be specialized devices designed for specific goals such as step-by-step instruction in the performance of a particular task (Scherer, 2012).
Active Comparator: Abbreviated Treatment
Steps of the Control Condition. Following an in-person session in which the pretest assessment is completed, each member of the control group will participate in two telephone or Skype sessions with the interventionist to discuss her or his needs for electronic cognitive supports. An abbreviated version of Scherer's (2012) MPT assessment will be administered via telephone or Skype in the first of these virtually-administered sessions. In the second telephone or Skype session, the interventionist will summarize the results of the abbreviated MPT assessment, suggest a variety of cognitive enhancement apps for tablet computers or smart phones that the control group participant can consider.
Cognitive Support Technology (CST) products and strategies are used to help people with disabilities compensate for or accommodate cognitive limitations (including those related to interpersonal communication and social cognition) that present difficulties for them in the performance of desired social roles, especially education and employment. CSTs may be mainstream everyday technologies such as tablet computers or they may be specialized devices designed for specific goals such as step-by-step instruction in the performance of a particular task (Scherer, 2012).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grade Point Average (GPA)
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Participant GPA
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Current academic standing
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Post-Secondary Enrollment Status
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
% of participants still enrolled in a postsecondary program
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Satisfaction with current living status and transportation access
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using single item 5-point Likert question on questionnaire
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Satisfaction with Social Support
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using single item 5-point Likert question on questionnaire
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Current Employment Status
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Three items on questionnaire including dichotomous employment question (e.g., are you employed?), if yes, number of hours employed and weekly earnings.
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
% of Participants Receiving Disability Benefits
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Whether participants receive SSDI and/or SSI benefits or not
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Depression Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using Beck Depression Inventory- II (BDI-II)
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Overall Health Status
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using RAND 36-item Health Survey
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using Perceived Stress Scale- 10
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Acceptance of Disability
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using the Acceptance of Disability Scale- Short Form
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)
Measured using the Qualify of Life Scale
Baseline (enrollment in study), 6 months, and 1 year (study completion)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Support Technology (CST)

Subscribe