SIROOP Registry - a Prospective Registry Study to Evaluate the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Disease Patients Treated with SIROlimus or Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Catheters (SIROOP)

October 27, 2024 updated by: Matthias Bossard, Luzerner Kantonsspital
The purpose of the SIROOP Registry is to retrospectively and prospectively collect baseline, clinical and procedural characteristics of patients who have undergone PCI and are treated with either currently available sirolimus or paclitaxel coated DCBs (see Table 1), irrespective of clinical presentation as well as to prospectively collect data about their clinical outcomes. Outcomes will be compared in different clinical subgroups. The impact of current DCBs in different clinical settings and coronary artery lesions on cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objectives in detail:

  • To evaluate procedural success, efficacy, performance and clinical outcomes among various patient cohorts, who undergo PCI using currently available DCBs:

    1. Periprocedural outcomes/complications, which will be analyzed, include: final result (e.g. residual stenosis, TIMI flow), dissections, perforations, prevalence of thrombus (assessed by angiography and intravascular imaging)
    2. Short and long-term clinical outcomes of interest comprise among others: new MI, unstable angina (UA), target lesion failure, target vessel revascularization, target lesion failure/ revascularization, repeat hospitalization, new/worsening heart failure, cardiogenic shock, stroke, bleedings, cardiovascular death and all-cause death.
  • To describe procedural and clinical performance of various DCB, either alone or in combination with other stent and coronary scaffold devices
  • To identify optimal strategies for lesion preparation in cases treated with DCB
  • To identify possible predictors for TLR after treatment with DCB
  • To describe early and late angiographic and OCT-findings among coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with DCB and/or various metallic stent and scaffold devices
  • To evaluate the impact of different antithrombotic regimens on patient's clinical outcomes
  • To study procedural and clinical outcomes among CAD patients requiring hemodynamic support using mechanical devices.
  • To describe economic implications (cost-effectiveness) of various interventional treatments for CAD.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This registry will recruit consecutive patients treated with either DCB alone or a hybrid strategy (metallic stent plus DCB). Ideally any patient treated with a DCB will be included in the present registry, either presenting with a de-novo coronary lesion (either elective or urgent procedure), with a ST or ISR.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject >18 years of age
  • Patients with significant acute or chronic coronary de-novo lesions or ISR lesions requiring treatment using PCI
  • Treatment with at least one DCB (device choice at the operator's discretion) In case of a patient with lesions treated at different procedural time, lesions will be separately collected and documented
  • Subjects must be willing to sign a patient informed consent (PIC) or must have signed the General Consent (GK).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is <18 years of age
  • Patient unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • pregnancy and lactation
  • Indication for surgical revascularization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Treatment
The project ́s main goal is to collect baseline, clinical and procedural data as well as to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of CAD patients treated with contemporary DCBs.
PTCA with either a Sirolimus eluting balloon or Paclitaxel eluting balloon
Other Names:
  • Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of target lesion failure (TLF) and target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: at 1 year
at 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of combination of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (including new MI, TLR or cardiovascular death)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of MACE
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of new MI (NSTEMI / STEMI)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of TIA or stroke
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of acute vessel closure
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of stent thrombosis or ISR
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of target lesion failure (TLF)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of ischemia driven TLR
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of all-cause death
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of cardiac death
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of all myocardial infarction and TV-MI
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of rehospitalization for recurrent angina
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of hospitalization for HF
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of rehospitalization for HF, resuscitated cardiac arrest or implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) implantation
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of bleeding events (access site or non-access site related) according to the BARC classification
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of vascular complications (according to VARC criteria)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of cardiogenic shock
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of acute renal failure/ contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of new ventricular arrhythmias
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of major adverse limb events (MALE)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of new York Heart Association (NYHA) class
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of angina according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Score
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of procedural success (final diameter stenosis < 30% without flow-limiting dissections)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Rate of periprocedural complications (e.g. coronary perforations, no-reflow)
Time Frame: at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Florim Cuculi, MD, Luzerner Kantonsspital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Sirolimus Eluting Balloon

Subscribe