Remote Monitoring in Cancer Care: A Platform Study

October 28, 2025 updated by: Mayo Clinic
This study investigates a device that closely monitors vital signs, as well as a smartphone application (app) that allows patients to respond to different questions and tests that will monitor for new symptoms. This study may help researchers understand if wearing the device is a better tool than standard vital sign assessment tools done only while at the doctor's office or hospital, and if using the smartphone app is a better tool than standard assessment tools used while in the doctor's office or hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Develop patient-specific algorithms to predict the trajectory of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and or neurotoxicity and time to escalation of medical intervention is needed. (Arm 1) II. Establish the validity for the use of mobile technology to assess neurologic symptoms remotely. (Arm 1) III. Compare the time to escalation of potential medical intervention between remote monitoring (RM) and standard care (SC) based on retrospective analysis of clinical trial data. (Arm 1) IV. Establish the feasibility for the use of wearable device for continuous, remote monitoring of physiologic parameters by quantifying false alerts and downstream clinical actions. (Arm 1) V. Define the range of physiologic variables associated with receipt of radiation and chemotherapy. (Arm 2) VI. Correlate PROs and physician rated CTCAE to biologic parameters. (Arm 2) VII. Establish the feasibility for the use of wearable device for continuous, remote monitoring of physiologic parameters by quantifying false alerts and downstream clinical actions. (Arm 2)

OUTLINE:

ARM 1: Patients undergoing CAR-T therapy use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) and smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms a few times a day for 5 weeks.

ARM 2: Patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) for 60 to 90 days after completion of RT. Patients also use the smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms before start of RT, after completion of RT, 3 months after completion of RT, and 1 year after completion of RT. In addition, patients complete weekly questionnaires regarding side effects and tolerance of the device.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing standard of care CAR-T cell therapy in the outpatient setting at Mayo Clinic. Patients undergoing standard of care radiation for (1) head and neck, (2) lung, or (3) gastrointestinal malignancies.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ARM 1: Age >= 18 years
  • ARM 1: Provide written informed consent
  • ARM 1: Patients undergoing commercial CAR-T cell therapy in an outpatient setting
  • ARM 2: Age >= 18 years
  • ARM 2: Provide written informed consent
  • ARM 2: Patients with a plan to undergo radiation therapy for lung, gastrointestinal, or head and neck cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ARM 1: Non-English speaking
  • ARM 1: Planned initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy in the inpatient setting
  • ARM 2: Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Arm 1 (wearable device[s], smartphone app)
Patients undergoing CAR-T therapy use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) and smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms a few times a day for 5 weeks.
Use smartphone app
Wear Biofourmis wearable device(s)
Other Names:
  • monitor
  • medical monitoring
Arm 2 (wearable device[s], smartphone app, questionnaires)
Patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers use the Biofourmis wearable device(s) for 90 days after completion of RT. Patients also use the smartphone app to answer a series of questions about health and neurologic symptoms before start of RT, after completion of RT, 3 months after completion of RT, and 1 year after completion of RT. In addition, patients complete weekly questionnaires regarding side effects and tolerance of the device.
Complete questionnaires
Use smartphone app
Wear Biofourmis wearable device(s)
Other Names:
  • monitor
  • medical monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of remote monitoring-based CRS detection/ prediction (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Up to 5 weeks
Assessment of neurotoxicity via digital capture of neurological assessment (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will assess agreement and concordance between assessment of neurotoxicity via digital capture of neurological assessment (ICE) as compared to standard in-person assessment.
Up to 5 weeks
BF-Mayo Neuro test (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will assess agreement and concordance between BF-Mayo Neuro test and ICE-based assessment of neurotoxicity.
Up to 5 weeks
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of novel digital neurotoxicity tests (BF-Neuro) (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will compare to standard in-person ICE based neurotoxicity assessment.
Up to 5 weeks
Range of physiologic variables associated with receipt of radiation and chemotherapy (Arm 2)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Up to 1 year
Quantification of false alerts and downstream clinical actions (Arm 2)
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be used for the establishment of the feasibility for the use of wearable device for continuous, remote monitoring of physiologic parameters.
Up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biovital index (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will assess correlation between Biovital index and BF-Mayo Neuro Test and adverse clinical events. Both continuous variables (physiologic parameters) and categorical variables (events) will be used to generate a mixed effects logistic regression model with repeated measures. The goal is to identify patterns of changes in the continuous data associated with either clinically relevant or significant events.
Up to 5 weeks
BF-Mayo Neuro Test (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will assess correlation between Biovital index and BF-Mayo Neuro Test and adverse clinical events. Both continuous variables (physiologic parameters) and categorical variables (events) will be used to generate a mixed effects logistic regression model with repeated measures. The goal is to identify patterns of changes in the continuous data associated with either clinically relevant or significant events.
Up to 5 weeks
Point-in-time assessment of physiological signals from wearable devices (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will assess agreement and concordance from wearable vs. standard of care devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman methods will be used for agreement and concordance analysis of the remote monitor reading compared to the "gold standard" standard of care devices.
Up to 5 weeks
Point-in-time assessment of physiological signals from standard of care devices (Arm 1)
Time Frame: Up to 5 weeks
Will assess agreement and concordance from wearable vs. standard of care devices. ICC and Bland-Altman methods will be used for agreement and concordance analysis of the remote monitor reading compared to the "gold standard" standard of care devices.
Up to 5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonas Paludo, M.D., Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe