- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05031208
Acute and Long Term Effects of VNS on Memory in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy
Research on the Acute and Long Term Effects on Memory and the Mechanism of Action of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy
Refractory epilepsy patients implanted with a vagus nerve stimulator perform a memory test at baseline in three conditions: invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and sham stimulation. After 6 weeks of VNS treatment, the memory test is repeated in two condition: invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and sham stimulation.
The endpoint of this experiment is assessing the effect of VNS and taVNS on memory performance.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Previous studies underlined the potential of both invasive as transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation to ameliorate certain cognitive functions.
In this randomized, controlled cross-over within-subjects study, a memory test is conducted in patients with refractory epilepsy who are implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation.
The memory test consists out of a word recognition paradigm based on the study of Clarck et al. published in 1999 in Nature Neuroscience. Testing is performed at baseline (before start of the stimulation) and after 6 weeks of treatment with vagus nerve stimulation.
During the first session, the patients complete the word recognition task during three interventions:
- Invasive vagus nerve stimulation
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (cymba concha)
- Sham vagus nerve stimulation (no stimulation)
During the second session, the patients complete the word recognition task during two interventions:
- Invasive vagus nerve stimulation
- Sham vagus nerve stimulation (no stimulation)
The goal is to investigate if invasive vagus nerve stimulation and transcutaneous nerve stimulation can influence (i.e. improve) the performance on the memory task and if this performance is improved after 6 weeks of VNS treatment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ghent, Belgium, 9000
- University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Refractory epilepsy
- Treated with vagus nerve stimulation
- IQ >= 70 and able to perform the memory task
Exclusion Criteria:
- IQ < 70
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Vagus nerve stimulation
Invasive vagus nerve stimulation
|
Word recognition task
|
|
Experimental: Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
Cymba concha stimulation
|
Word recognition task
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham vagus nerve stimulation
No vagus nerve stimulation
|
Word recognition task
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Immediate recall score at session 1
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Free recall score for correctly recalled words (min score 0,max score 21, higher score indicates better performance), calculated as a percentage
|
At baseline
|
|
Immediate recall score at session 2
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of VNS treatment
|
Free recall score for correctly recalled words (min score 0, max score 21, higher score indicates better performance)), calculated as a percentage
|
After 6 weeks of VNS treatment
|
|
Delayed recognition scores at session 1
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Hitscore for correctly recognized target words (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates better performance), score for not recognized target words= misses (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates worse performance),correct rejection score of non-target related words (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates better performance), score for incorrect recognition of non-target related words= false alarms (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates worse performance), discrimination index= hit score -false alarm score (min score 0,max score 63, higher score indicates better performance).
All scores are calculated as a percentage.
|
At baseline
|
|
Delayed recognition scores at session 2
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of VNS treatment
|
Hitscore for correctly recognized target words (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates better performance), score for not recognized target words= misses (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates worse performance),correct rejection score of non-target related words (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates better performance), score for incorrect recognition of non-target related words= false alarms (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates worse performance), discrimination index= hit score -false alarm score (min score 0,max score 48, higher score indicates better performance).
All scores are calculated as a percentage.
|
After 6 weeks of VNS treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Attention score at session 1
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Score of correct responses on 6 open question (min score 0, max score 6, higher score indicates better performance), calculated as a percentage
|
At baseline
|
|
Attention score at session 2
Time Frame: After 6 weeks of VNS treatment
|
Score of correct responses on 6 open question (min score 0, max score 6, higher score indicates better performance), calculated as a percentage
|
After 6 weeks of VNS treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Clark KB, Naritoku DK, Smith DC, Browning RA, Jensen RA. Enhanced recognition memory following vagus nerve stimulation in human subjects. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):94-8. doi: 10.1038/4600.
- Jacobs HI, Riphagen JM, Razat CM, Wiese S, Sack AT. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation boosts associative memory in older individuals. Neurobiol Aging. 2015 May;36(5):1860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
- Colzato LS, Ritter SM, Steenbergen L. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances divergent thinking. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
- Steenbergen L, Sellaro R, Stock AK, Verkuil B, Beste C, Colzato LS. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances response selection during action cascading processes. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;25(6):773-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
- Mertens A, Gadeyne S, Lescrauwaet E, Carrette E, Meurs A, De Herdt V, Dewaele F, Raedt R, Miatton M, Boon P, Vonck K. The potential of invasive and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation to improve verbal memory performance in epilepsy patients. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 7;12(1):1984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05842-3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EC/2016/0786
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Refractory Epilepsy
-
NaviFUS CorporationTaipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompletedDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Resistant | Intractable Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Drug Refractory Epilepsy | Epilepsy, Drug Refractory | Epilepsy, Intractable | Medication Resistant EpilepsyTaiwan
-
Madeline FieldsRecruitingDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy | Medically Refractory EpilepsyUnited States
-
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical CenterBeijing X-Magtech Technology LimitedRecruitingRefractory Epilepsy in ChildrenChina
-
University of Colorado, DenverColorado Department of Public Health and EnvironmentUnknownEpilepsy, Unspecified, Refractory (Medically)United States
-
NeuroOne Medical Technologies CorporationNot yet recruitingDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Refractory Epilepsy
-
Seattle Children's HospitalAadi Bioscience, Inc.CompletedEpilepsy IntractableUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierRecruitingRefractory EpilepsyFrance
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingEpilepsy | Epilepsy IntractableUnited States
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingNot yet recruitingRefractory Epilepsy | NeuromodulationChina
-
Aston UniversityBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation TrustEnrolling by invitationEpilepsy in Children | Epilepsy in Youth | Epilepsy (Treatment Refractory)United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Memory task
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedSpastic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
Uppsala UniversityUnknownSleep | Sleep DeprivationSweden
-
Gail EskesNova Scotia Health AuthorityActive, not recruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingBalance | Cognitive LoadPakistan
-
Technical University of MunichGerman Research FoundationNot yet recruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedCognitive Load, PerformancePakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedGait Analysis | Cognitive Load, PerformancePakistan
-
University of ArkansasCompletedEpilepsyUnited States
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...WithdrawnNormal Physiology
-
Uppsala UniversityUnknownProbiotics | Food Preferences | Microbiota | Dietary Supplements | MetabolismSweden