- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05033184
Effectiveness of a Brief Internet-delivered Behaviour Change Intervention Among Healthy Middle-aged Adults
November 30, 2023 updated by: University of Regina
Effectiveness of a Brief Internet-delivered Behaviour Change Intervention Among Healthy Middle-aged Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous studies have demonstrated the need to move beyond the common misconception of midlife as a time of crisis so that further understandings of the midlife as a time of opportunity for the maintenance and improvement of health can be developed.
Several psychosocial factors such as resilience, emotion regulation, perceived social support, and control beliefs have been identified as having a role in the adoption of healthier lifestyle habits in middle age which, in turn, may decrease the risk of a developing or worsening chronic disease.
Several behaviour change interventions have also been proposed in the literature.
As Canada's population ages, it is important that brief behaviour change interventions, and the psychosocial factors that facilitate such behaviour changes, be identified as a way to promote better health during the midlife years so as to improve the experience of aging.
The present study is aimed at evaluating the influence of psychosocial factors on the adoption of healthy lifestyle habits.
Specifically, this study aims to examine whether differing experiences of social support, resilience, emotion regulation, and control beliefs influence physical activity levels following a brief behaviour change intervention.
Participants will be asked to complete a demographics questionnaire followed by a series of measures to determine the individual's perceived levels of social support, resilience, emotion regulation, and control beliefs.
After completing this set of questionnaires, participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control condition.
Participants in the experimental condition will be asked to complete the Brief Action Planning exercise as a way to identify a goal related to health behaviours.
Participants in the control condition will be asked to identify a goal related to health behaviours without being introduced to the Brief Action Planning exercise.
Two weeks and four weeks following this intervention, individuals will be asked to indicate the degree to which they were able to achieve their health goal.
It is expected that individuals in the experimental condition will experience greater improvement in physical activity levels compared to individuals in the control condition.
The investigators also anticipate that improvements in physical activity levels in the experimental condition will be influenced by the psychosocial factors of social support, resilience, emotion regulation, and control beliefs.
The potential significance of this study includes increasing awareness of the influence of psychosocial factors on health behaviours and the possible effectiveness of a brief behaviour change intervention among middle-aged adults.
Potential interventions may be used in clinical settings or community programs in which middle-aged adults engage.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
178
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, S4S 0A2
- University of Regina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
35 years to 64 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Residing in Saskatchewan, Canada
- Between the ages of 35 and 64 years
- Deemed eligible to increase physical activity levels by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (Par-Q+; Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 2019)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Residing outside of Saskatchewan, Canada
- Under the age of 35 years or over the age of 64 years
- Deemed ineligible to increase physical activity levels by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (Par-Q+; Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, 2019)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Brief Action Planning Exercise
|
The Brief Action Planning exercise is a previously developed goal-setting exercise which has been designed to incorporate aspects of motivational interviewing such as compassion, acceptance, evocation, and partnership.
It is a tool that allows participants to identify an aspect of their life they would like to improve upon and guides them through the process of making a specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely (SMART) goal.
It also assesses their confidence in achieving this goal so as to assist with making alternative plans if confidence is low.
|
|
Active Comparator: Goal Setting Exercise
|
The Goal Setting exercise allows participants to identify an aspect of their life they would like to improve upon without incorporating aspects of motivational interviewing components or providing any guidance on how to set this goal.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Baseline)
Time Frame: Baseline Period
|
Our final outcome measure will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
The IPAQ will measure the degree to which participants spent time on vigorous, moderate, walking, and sitting activities.
The IPAQ gets scored as categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels, and high activity levels).
A score of high activity levels is assigned to those who engage in vigorous activities at least 3 days a week OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous activities.
A score of moderate levels of physical activity will be assigned to those who engage in 3 or more days of vigorous activity and/ or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous activities.
Those who do not meet the criteria for either vigorous or moderate will be scored as having low levels of activity.
|
Baseline Period
|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Follow-Up 1)
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-Up Period
|
Our final outcome measure will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
The IPAQ will measure the degree to which participants spent time on vigorous, moderate, walking, and sitting activities.
The IPAQ gets scored as categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels, and high activity levels).
A score of high activity levels is assigned to those who engage in vigorous activities at least 3 days a week OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous activities.
A score of moderate levels of physical activity will be assigned to those who engage in 3 or more days of vigorous activity and/ or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous activities.
Those who do not meet the criteria for either vigorous or moderate will be scored as having low levels of activity.
|
2-Week Follow-Up Period
|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Follow-Up 2)
Time Frame: 4-Week Follow-Up Period
|
Our final outcome measure will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).
The IPAQ will measure the degree to which participants spent time on vigorous, moderate, walking, and sitting activities.
The IPAQ gets scored as categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels, and high activity levels).
A score of high activity levels is assigned to those who engage in vigorous activities at least 3 days a week OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous activities.
A score of moderate levels of physical activity will be assigned to those who engage in 3 or more days of vigorous activity and/ or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous activities.
Those who do not meet the criteria for either vigorous or moderate will be scored as having low levels of activity.
|
4-Week Follow-Up Period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Confidence (Baseline)
Time Frame: Baseline Period
|
The Confidence outcome asks the participant to rate how confident they feel in following their plan The degree to which participants report that they are confident about carrying out their plan over the next two weeks on a scale from 1 to 10, with scores above 7 indicating high confidence and scores below 7 indicating low confidence.
|
Baseline Period
|
|
Confidence (Follow-Up)
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-Up Period
|
The Confidence outcome asks the participant to rate how confident they feel in following their plan The degree to which participants report that they are confident about carrying out their plan over the next two weeks on a scale from 1 to 10, with scores above 7 indicating high confidence and scores below 7 indicating low confidence.
|
2-Week Follow-Up Period
|
|
Achievement (Follow-Up 1)
Time Frame: 2-Week Fellow-Up Period
|
The Achievement outcome asks the participant to rate the degree to which they followed their plan over the previous two weeks by selecting either 'fully,' 'partially,' or 'not at all.'
|
2-Week Fellow-Up Period
|
|
Achievement (Follow-Up 2)
Time Frame: 4-Week Follow-Up Period
|
The Achievement outcome asks the participant to rate the degree to which they followed their plan over the previous two weeks by selecting either 'fully,' 'partially,' or 'not at all.'
|
4-Week Follow-Up Period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Natasha L Gallant, PhD, University of Regina
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
- Warburton DER, Jamnik VK, Bredin SSD, Gledhill N on behalf of the PAR-Q+ Collaboration. The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) and Electronic Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (ePARmed-X+). Health & Fitness Journal of Canada. 2011; 4(2): 3-23.
- Infurna FJ, Gerstorf D, Lachman ME. Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges. Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):470-485. doi: 10.1037/amp0000591.
- Lachman ME, Teshale S, Agrigoroaei S. Midlife as a Pivotal Period in the Life Course: Balancing Growth and Decline at the Crossroads of Youth and Old Age. Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Jan 1;39(1):20-31. doi: 10.1177/0165025414533223.
- Gutnick D, Reims K, Davis C, Gainforth H, Jay M, Cole S. Brief action planning to facilitate behavior change and support patient self-management. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2014; (21)1: 17-29.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 30, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
August 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
September 2, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
December 7, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 30, 2023
Last Verified
November 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-074
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
The study's principal investigator, supervisor, and project investigators will be the only persons with access to the data.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Health Behavior
-
Holbaek SygehusCompletedHealth Behavior | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Health LiteracyDenmark
-
Penn State UniversityCompletedBehavior, HealthUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemUniversity of Kansas; University of Maryland, College ParkActive, not recruiting
-
Istinye UniversityRecruitingHealth-Related BehaviorTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyHealth and Human Services Commission (HHSC); Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent... and other collaboratorsCompletedHealth-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
University of PrimorskaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences; Ministry of Defence, SloveniaActive, not recruitingHealth-Related BehaviorSlovenia
-
Boston Children's HospitalAllan & Gill Gray FoundationCompletedSleep | Health-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
University of LisbonRecruitingOral Health Behavior Change | Oral Health Care | Oral Health Self-efficacyPortugal
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingSleep | Health-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
Universiti Teknologi MaraUniversiti Putra Malaysia; Ministry of Health, Malaysia; Institute for Health... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealth Attitude | Health Behavior | Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Behavior, Health | Attitude to Health | Preparedness | OutbreaksMalaysia
Clinical Trials on Brief Action Planning Exercise
-
Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiCompletedDegenerative Knee DiseaseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Northwestern UniversityCompleted
-
Seoul National UniversityNot yet recruitingMetabolic Syndrome | Prediabetes
-
The University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, GreensboroUniversity of South CarolinaNot yet recruitingPhysical Activity | Cognition | HabitsUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalWithdrawn