Whether Sputum Can Serve as an Alternative Source for Liquid Biopsy in Patients With Lung Cancer

August 28, 2021 updated by: Zhou Chengzhi, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease

A Prospective Study of Advanced NSCLC Patients Genomic Landscape Through Sputum NGS Detection

This study intends to use Onconscreen plus 520 Panel (Burning Rock, China) to conduct NGS testing in sputum, tissues and blood samples of patients with advanced NSCLC. In order to explore the use of sputum as a diagnosis method for NSCLC patients, we will collect relevant clinical information and follow-up treatment information. The primary endpoint will reveal the effectiveness, accuracy, and feasibility in sputum, as compared to tissues and blood samples. This study aims to study the feasibility and advantages/disadvantages of using sputum as an noval body fluid biopsy option.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

With the advancements in the development of targeted therapy, the detection of actionable genes has become routine practice in diagnosing lung cancer, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to its non-invasiveness and great accessibility, plasma-based mutation profiling, with a sensitivity of approximately 70% relative to tissue samples, is widely used in clinical settings. Profiling using other body fluids such as pleural effusion, ascites, cerebrospinal fluid have been actively explored. Circulating cell-free DNA has also been shown to be present in other bodily fluids such as sputum and urine, which have potential to serve as liquid biopsy media for comprehensive mutation profiling. In this study, we investigated the potential of sputum obtained from NSCLC patients for mutation profiling using matched tissue, plasma and sputum from more than 30 advanced-stage NSCLC patients.

Baseline tissues, plasma and sputum samples from more than 30 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients with 520 Panel sequencing (tissue 1000X, sputum 1000X, plasma cfDNA 10000X), in different methods will be compared.

Primary endpoints:

1、Compare different sample types with concordence rate, sensitivity, and specificity.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Zhou Chengzhi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Planning to enroll more than 30 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients, age over 18 years old following the eligibility criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC in AJCC TNM stage (8th edition) confirmed with histology or cytology;
  2. Newly diagnosed;
  3. There are sufficient samples that meet the requirements for examination;
  4. Eligible for the next anti-tumor systemic treatment;
  5. Willing to sign the consent inform, age ≥18 years;
  6. Patients willing to cooperate with the planned follow-up schedule;
  7. Permit to collect clinical data needed by the institute.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with other malignant tumors at the same time (except for fully treated cervical carcinoma in situ, basal or squamous cell skin cancer);
  2. The patient has other serious diseases that may affect follow-up and short-term survival;
  3. Any other medical conditions and social/psychological problems that investigator evaluated is not suitable to enroll in this study;
  4. Absents of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) during clinical follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sputum group
Sputum samples from more than 30 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients with 520 Panel sequencing (sputum 1000X)
Extract DNA from sputum sample, minimum DNA amount should be over 50ng.
Tissue group
Clinical data review to obtain corresponding tissue samples from more than 30 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients with 520 Panel sequencing (tissue 1000X)
Plasma group
Clinical data review to obtain corresponding plasma samples from more than 30 newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients with 520 Panel sequencing (plasma 10000X)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare different sample types with concordence rate, sensitivity, and specificity.
Time Frame: up to 2 years
  1. Concordance rate was defined as the fraction of the total number of true positive and true negative patients relative to the cohort or indicated subgroup;
  2. Sensitivity rate means true positive rate, true positive patients were defined as those who carried at least one genomic alteration that were detected in both matched samples.
  3. Specificity rate means ture negative rate, patients were as defined true negative if no alteration was detected from either matched sample.
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chengzhi Zhou, Dr. PhD., The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CROC2004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NSCLC

Clinical Trials on Next generation sequencing

Subscribe