ROX Index and ROX Vector to Predict Nasal High Flow / Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Failure in Neonates

September 19, 2021 updated by: Pavel Mazmanyan, Erebouni Medical Center

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy are two primary therapies for the treatment of respiratory distress in newborns. However, a considerable number of infants, who are initially treated with CPAP and NHF, will develop worsening respiratory failure and eventually require intubation for mechanical ventilation and the administration of surfactant. Infants who fail noninvasive respiratory therapy may suffer the consequences of delayed intubation, surfactant administration and other adverse outcomes. The most challenging decisions in the management of respiratory distress after birth is to decide when to move from a noninvasive respiratory support to invasive mechanical ventilation and give surfactant to decrease pulmonary damage and improve outcomes. There are no clinically adequate predictors of early CPAP failure at the time of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Many measurements have been investigated for their ability to predict CPAP failure in infants such as fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), PaO2/FiO2 and the stable micro bubble test as soon as possible after birth. Roca and colleagues first established the ROX index to predict the success of NHF therapy in adults with pneumonia. The ROX index combines three common measurements: FiO2, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate. Combining the ROX values with the change in the respiratory rate and FiO2 can indicate whether escalation is required. It was proposed that XY plot of the key components of ROX may show the direction of changes in vector form.

The investigators hypothesized that the ROX index and ROX vector can be used for predicting the failure of CPAP and NHF in neonates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective is to explore the usefulness of ROX index to predict treatment failure of NHF and CPAP therapies in neonates.

The primary outcome is treatment failure within 72 h after start of the therapy with NHF or CPAP

Treatment failure criteria is reached once an infant is receiving maximal therapy for their treatment (NHF 8 L/min) or CPAP 7 cm H2O plus at least one of:

  1. Sustained increase in oxygen requirement ≥50% to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) 90%-94%.
  2. Any infant requiring urgent intubation and the subsequent mechanical ventilation, as determined by the physician.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Yerevan, Armenia
        • Recruiting
        • Erebouni Medical Centre, NICU
        • Contact:
      • Yerevan, Armenia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Republican Institute of Reproductive Health, NICU
        • Contact:
      • Yerevan, Armenia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Research Center of Maternal and Child Health Protection NICU
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 1 day (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

neonates with respiratory distress

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • They are admitted to a NICU when <24 h old, AND
  • The decision has been made by the attending clinician, to commence or continue (from stabilization at birth) non-invasive respiratory support (this does not include the provision of supplemental oxygen alone), AND
  • They have not previously been intubated or received surfactant

Exclusion criteria:

  • They immediately require intubation and ventilation (determined by attending clinician), OR
  • They already satisfy 'treatment failure' criteria, OR
  • They have a known major congenital anomaly or air leak

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Predicting treatment failure of Nasal High Flow in newborns
newborns with respiratory distress treated with NHF
Newborns with respiratory distress treated with NHF.
Predicting treatment failure of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in newborns
newborns with respiratory distress treated with CPAP
Newborns with respiratory distress treated with CPAP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants requiring escalation of treatment
Time Frame: 72 hours

Treatment failure criteria is reached once an infant is receiving maximal therapy for their treatment (NHF 8 L/min) or CPAP 7 cm H2O plus at least one of:

  1. Sustained increase in oxygen requirement above ≥50% to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) 90%-94%.
  2. Any infant requiring urgent intubation and the subsequent mechanical ventilation, as determined by the physician.
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with death
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Death before discharge from the hospital
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants with pneumothorax
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Pneumothorax determined by chest radiograph
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants with Necrotizing enterocolitis stage II-III
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Necrotizing enterocolitis determined by abdominal radiograph
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants with Intra-ventricular hemorrhage
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Intra ventricular hemorrhage confirmed by head ultrasound
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants with Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time Frame: through study completion, up to 6 months
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
through study completion, up to 6 months
Number of participants with Cystic Periventricular Leukomalacia
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Cystic Periventricular Leukomalacia confirmed by ultrasound
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants with PDA needed surgical treatment
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Patent ductus arteriosus
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants with ROP needing laser treatment
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Retinopathy of prematurity needing laser treatment
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Number of participants requiring blood transfusion
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Blood transfusion
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
total number of days on O2 / noninvasive ventilation
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
total number of days on O2 / noninvasive ventilation
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Total number days in the hospital
Time Frame: Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months
Total number days in the hospital
Monitored for the entire stay in hospital, until discharge, up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pavel Mazmanyan, Prof, Head of Department of Neonatology YSMU

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N 6-2/2, 2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Predictive Value of Tests

Clinical Trials on Nasal high flow

Subscribe