Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis (NE-PERT)

September 2, 2024 updated by: Rupjyoti Talukdar, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: a Double -Blinded Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial (NE-PERT Trial)

Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity. Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer.

Neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion starts, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception begins that results in pain. Blockade of the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (~25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases.

This led to the investigators' hypothesis that negative feedback of CCK by non enteric coated pancreatic enzymes could ameliorate pain in a more effective manner by NE-PERT.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas characterized by progressive and irreversible damage. It manifests with abdominal pain and/or exocrine or endocrine insufficiency. Recurrent abdominal pain is the dominant clinical hallmark that mandates aggressive management. Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity.

Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer.

It has been postulated that neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion from the pancreas begins, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception is initiated that results in pain. On this premise, the investigators hypothesized that blocking the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain.

Earlier meta-analyses that evaluated the effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation on pain reported that there were no overall benefits in pain management. All but two of those studies used enteric coated enzyme. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (~25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases. However, on subgroup analyses in the aforementioned meta-analyses, pain reduction was observed in the two studies that used non-enteric coated preparations. These studies were done several years earlier, had a small sample size, and had a cross over design. This formed that rationale of the investigators' current study to test the hypothesis using a statistically valid design with a higher sample size that would allow subgroup analyses, adjust for alternative pain mechanisms, and achieve a better effect size.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

107

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Andhra Pradesh
      • Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500082
        • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pancreatitis of at least 3 years
  • At least 3 episodes of pain in the past 3 months
  • Pain score of at least 3 on VAS (0-10)
  • Age 18-60yrs
  • Both genders

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute pancreatitis episode at the time of enrolment.
  • Pancreatic cancer.
  • Other chronic painful conditions.
  • Active substance use (alcohol, smoking, smokeless tobacco, illicit drugs).
  • Pregnancy and lactation.
  • Inability to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NE PERT
Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsules containing 30,000U of protease will be provided three times a day along with food (breakfast, lunch and dinner)
The patients will be given a non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsule containing 30000 U of protease thrice daily along with meals for 3 months.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Similar appearing glucose capsules will be provided three times a day along with food (breakfast, lunch and dinner)
The patients will be given a non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsule containing 30000 U of protease thrice daily along with meals for 3 months.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain score 1
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual analogue score will be used. Score ranges from 0-10, 10 indicating most severe.
3 months
Change in pain score 2
Time Frame: 3 months
Izbicki pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in number of painful days
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of days when the patient experienced pain
3 months
Change in number of painful days
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of days when the patient experienced pain
6 months
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.
3 months
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
Will be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.
6 months
Change in analgesic requirement
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of analgesic tablets required will be recorded
3 months
Change in analgesic requirement
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of analgesic tablets required will be recorded
6 months
Change in the number of hospitalization
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded
3 months
Change in the number of hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded
6 months
Change in pain score 1
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual analogue score will be used. Score ranges from 0-10, 10 indicating most severe.
6 months
Change in pain score 2
Time Frame: 6 months
Izbicki pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [First follow-up]
Time Frame: 3 months
Pin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum)
3 months
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [Second follow-up]
Time Frame: 6 months
Pin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum);
6 months
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [First follow-up]
Time Frame: 3 months
Cold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)
3 months
Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [Second follow-up]
Time Frame: 6 months
Cold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)
6 months
Change in pain DETECT score [First follow-up]
Time Frame: 3 months
The painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.
3 months
Change in pain DETECT score [Second follow-up]
Time Frame: 6 months
The painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rupjyoti Talukdar, MD, AGAF, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After 6 months of data publication, on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation

Subscribe