- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05044078
Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition Techniques With Conventional Therapy in Mechanical Neck Pain
February 2, 2022 updated by: Mahrukh Siddiqi, Dow University of Health Sciences
Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition Techniques With Conventional Therapy in Mechanical Neck Pain- A Randomized Control Trial
The objective of this randomized control trial is to determine the effectiveness of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition techniques with conventional therapy in mechanical neck pain to improve Pain, Range of Motion, and Functional Disability in long term.
This study is being conducted at the Physiotherapy department of Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi (former institute of Dow University of Health Sciences) among 80 patients with mechanical neck pain on the basis of non-probability purposive sample technique with screening for study criteria through a consultant physician (blinded) .
After taking informed consent all participants will be randomly allocated in two groups through second researcher who is not involved in screening, baseline assessment and providing intervention.
Group 1 will receive Autogenic Inhibition muscle energy technique (MET) with conventional therapy and Group 2 will receive Reciprocal inhibition MET with conventional therapy.
A total of 12 sessions will be provided.
Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after 1st session, and at last session.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74200
- Sindh Institue of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 50 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Moderate intensity (3.5-7.4cm) Pain on VAS
- Limited or Painful Cervical ROM
- Pain more than 4 weeks (sub-acute and chronic)
- 20-50 years Age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any Symptom and sign of Radiculopathy and Myelopathy
- Any neurological disease like Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson or Stroke
- Taking any Pain medication
- Trigger Point of Upper Trapezius
- Any fracture, surgical procedure, or trauma of the cervical spine
- Any red flag or signs of serious pathology like rheumatic or inflammatory diseases, malignancy, infection, or vascular disease such as Vertebro-Basilar Insufficiency.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1 (Autogenic Inhibition)
Autogenic Inhibition (5 reps, 10-sec hold, 5-sec rest in between each rep, 1 set, in all sessions) will be provided with the Conventional therapy including neck Isometric strengthening exercise (Neck Flexion, Extension, Both sides Rotation, and Neck Bending with each 5 rep, 10-sec hold, 1 set, in all sessions), Maitland Central posterio-anterior glide (Grade 1 and 2, 30 rep, 3 sets, in all sessions) and hot pack (10 minutes in all sessions on the back of the neck)
|
If a sub-maximal contraction of the muscle is followed by stretching of the same muscle it is known as Autogenic Inhibition MET.
|
|
Active Comparator: Group 2 (Reciprocal Inhibition)
Reciprocal Inhibition (5 reps, 10-sec hold, 5-sec rest in between each rep, 1 set, in all sessions) will be provided with the with same Conventional therapy as in group 1 .
|
If a submaximal contraction of a muscle is followed by stretching of the opposite muscle then this is known as Reciprocal Inhibition MET.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in pain on the 10 centimetre Visual analogue scale (VAS-10cm) at first day.
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 day
|
The patient will asked to mark the pain Intensity on the line of 0-10cm that measures the level of pain.
The 0 refers no pain and 10-cm refers excruciating pain as perceived as maximum.
|
Baseline and 1 day
|
|
Change from baseline in pain on the 10 centimetre Visual analogue scale (VAS-10cm) at 12 session.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 weeks
|
The patient will asked to mark the pain Intensity on the line of 0-10cm that measures the level of pain.
The 0 refers no pain and 10-cm refers excruciating pain as perceived as maximum
|
Baseline and 3 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in disability on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at first session.
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 day
|
This questionnaire has been designed to give information as to neck pain of patient has affected the ability to manage in everyday life.
Patient will be asked to answer every section and mark in each section only the one box that most closely describes his or her problem.
The NDI can be scored as a raw score or doubled and expressed as a percent.
Each section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means 'No pain' and 5 means 'Worst imaginable pain'.
Points summed to a total score.The test can be interpreted as a raw score, with a maximum score of 50, or as a percentage.
The 0 points or 0% means : no activity limitations, 50 points or 100% means complete activity limitation.
A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability.
It is available in both English and Urdu.
Minimum Detectable Change (90% confidence): 5 points or 10% points.
|
Baseline and 1 day
|
|
Change from baseline in disability on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 12 sessions.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 weeks
|
This questionnaire has been designed to give information as to neck pain of patient has affected the ability to manage in everyday life.
Patient will be asked to answer every section and mark in each section only the one box that most closely describes his or her problem.
The NDI can be scored as a raw score or doubled and expressed as a percent.
Each section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means 'No pain' and 5 means 'Worst imaginable pain'.
Points summed to a total score.The test can be interpreted as a raw score, with a maximum score of 50, or as a percentage.
The 0 points or 0% means : no activity limitations, 50 points or 100% means complete activity limitation.
A higher score indicates more patient-rated disability.
It is available in both English and Urdu.
Minimum Detectable Change (90% confidence): 5 points or 10% points.
|
Baseline and 3 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in Neck range of motion measured through Goniometer at first session.
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 day
|
It is an instrument that is used to measures the available Range of Motion around a joint in degrees.
The investigator will appropriately place goniometer to measure the range of motions of neck (Flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion and rotation).
Lower the reading of goniometer suggests decreased in range of motion and vice versa.
|
Baseline and 1 day
|
|
Change from baseline in Neck range of motion measured through Goniometer at 12 session.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 weeks
|
It is an instrument that is used to measures the available Range of Motion around a joint in degrees.
The investigator will appropriately place goniometer to measure the range of motions of neck (Flexion, extension, right and left lateral flexion and rotation).
Lower the reading of goniometer suggests decreased in range of motion and vice versa.
|
Baseline and 3 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mahrukh Siddiqi, MSAPT, Dow University of Health Sciences
- Study Director: Saeed Akhter, MSPT, Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan
- Principal Investigator: Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, MSAPT, Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
- Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302.
- Farooq MN, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Gilani SA, Hafeez A. Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1469-5.
- Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, Blyth F, Brooks P, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Blore J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1309-15. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
- Osama M, Tassadaq N, Malik RJ. Effect of muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A pilot study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Feb;70(2):344-347. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.14189.
- Osama M, Shakil Ur Rehman S. Effects of static stretching as compared to autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques in the management of mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 May;70(5):786-790. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.9596.
- Phadke A, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2016 Apr 14;35:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
- Gross A, Kay TM, Paquin JP, Blanchette S, Lalonde P, Christie T, Dupont G, Graham N, Burnie SJ, Gelley G, Goldsmith CH, Forget M, Hoving JL, Bronfort G, Santaguida PL; Cervical Overview Group. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 28;1(1):CD004250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub5.
- Thomas E, Cavallaro AR, Mani D, Bianco A, Palma A. The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Aug 27;27:35. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7. eCollection 2019.
- Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Hoy D, Buchbinder R, Mansournia MA, Bettampadi D, Ashrafi-Asgarabad A, Almasi-Hashiani A, Smith E, Sepidarkish M, Cross M, Qorbani M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Woolf AD, March L, Collins G, Ferreira ML. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m791. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m791.
- Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):802-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
- Howell ER. The association between neck pain, the Neck Disability Index and cervical ranges of motion: a narrative review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011 Sep;55(3):211-21.
- Binder AI. Neck pain. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Aug 4;2008:1103.
- Evans G. Identifying and treating the causes of neck pain. Med Clin North Am. 2014 May;98(3):645-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
- Heintz MM, Hegedus EJ. Multimodal management of mechanical neck pain using a treatment based classification system. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(4):217-24. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818260.
- Karnath BM. Identifying the musculoskeletal causes of neck pain [Internet]. Rheumatologynethreefiverk.com. [cited 2021 Apr 2]. Available from: https://www.rheumatologynetwork.com/view/identifying-musculoskeletal-causes-neck-pain
- Binder AI. Cervical spondylosis and neck pain. BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):527-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39127.608299.80. No abstract available.
- Miller J, Gross A, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):334-54.
- What can you do about non-specific neck pain? Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG); 2019.
- Waxenbaum JA, Lu M. Physiology, Muscle Energy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
- Elsevier. Muscle Energy Techniques E-Book [Internet]. Elsevier.com. [cited 2021 Apr 2]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/books/muscle-energy-techniques-with-dvdrom/chaitow/978-0-7020-3243-1.
- Gandbhir VN, Cunha B. Goniometer. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020
- Kahl C, Cleland JA. Visual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill pain Questionnaire: an overview of psychometric properties. Phys Ther Rev. 2005;10(2):123-8
- Gross AR, Kay T, Hondras M, Goldsmith C, Haines T, Peloso P, Kennedy C, Hoving J. Manual therapy for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2002 Aug;7(3):131-49. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0465.
- Satria Nugraha MH, Antari NKAJ, Saraswati NLPGK. The efficacy of muscle energy technique in individuals with mechanical neck pain: A systematic review. Sport Fit J. 2020;8(2):91.
- Yadav H. Efficacy of Muscle Energy Technique and Deep Neck Flexors Training in Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical trial. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;4(1).
- Jalal Y, Ahmad A, Rahman AU; Irfanullah; Daud M; Aneela. Effectiveness of muscle energy technique on cervical range of motion and pain. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 May;68(5):811-813.
- Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2545-2550. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
- Branco. Cervical Range of Motion and Isometrics [Internet]. Prpaspinesurgery.com. [cited 2021 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.prpaspinesurgery.com/wpcontent/uploads/Isometrics-cervical.pdf.
- Cervical Spine Goniometry [Internet]. Uwa.edu. [cited 2021 Apr 2]. Available from: http://at.uwa.edu/gon/cspine.htm
- Ackelman BH, Lindgren U. Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med. 2002 Nov;34(6):284-7. doi: 10.1080/165019702760390383.
- Siddiqui M, Akhter S, Baig AAM. Effects of autogenic and reciprocal inhibition techniques with conventional therapy in mechanical neck pain - a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jul 25;23(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05668-0.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 28, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 4, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
September 14, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 3, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 2, 2022
Last Verified
February 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MSiddiqi
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mechanical Neck Pain
-
Bahçeşehir UniversityNot yet recruitingMechanical Neck Pain
-
University of FaisalabadCompletedChronic Mechanical Neck PainPakistan
-
King Saud UniversityPIPRAMS, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradseh, IndiaCompletedChronic Mechanical Neck PainIndia
-
MTI UniversityCompletedForward Head Posture | Mechanical Neck PainEgypt
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityRecruitingMechanical Neck PainEgypt
-
Riphah International UniversityNot yet recruitingMechanical Neck PainPakistan
-
Najran UniversityCompletedMechanical Neck PainSaudi Arabia
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Autogenic Inhibition MET
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruiting
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruitingIliotibial Band SyndromePakistan
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruitingSacroiliac Joint Dysfunction | Muscle Energy TechniquesPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruitingLower Cross SyndromePakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingPiriformis SyndromePakistan
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedNon Specific Chronic Neck PainPakistan
-
Foundation University IslamabadCompleted
-
Saadyya Ahmed Abdalhamed AladawiRecruiting