Identifying Decision Making Needs for Older Adult Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer Considering Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy

April 27, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Identifying Decision Making Needs for Older Adult Women With Breast Cancer Considering Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy

This study collects information and identifies decision making needs for older adult women with stage I-III breast cancer considering neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Using this information, a decision support tool is then developed to provide patients and physicians with tailored information regarding the risks and benefits of chemotherapy and values clarification to support high-quality, shared decision. Subsequently, the decision support tool will be tested amongst older patients with early-stage breast cancer and health care providers navigating the decision process around chemotherapy, and further refined through an iterative process.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To characterize and describe the informational needs and preferences in older adult women who intend on receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-III breast cancer.

Ia. Conduct semi-structured interviews with women who have completed the treatment decision process to collect informational needs and elicit decision-making needs and preferences.

Ib. Utilize validated data collection instruments to assess the shared decision-making process and health literacy needs.

II. To develop a decision support tool for use by patients and healthcare providers to guide the chemotherapy decision-making process in older women (>= 65) with early-stage breast cancer.

IIa. To conduct cognitive testing of the decision tool. IIb. To conduct a field test of the decision tool in order to demonstrate feasibility and acceptability in real-world clinical settings.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo interviews and complete questionnaires over 1-2 hours. Patients and physicians also participate in a discussion and complete shared decision-making questionnaire over 15-30 minutes. Subsequently, a decision support tool will be developed consistent with standards for content development and evaluation from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration and implemented through an iterative process of design, development and evaluation to engage end users in its development. Once developed, field testing of the decision tool will be conducted to demonstrate feasibility and acceptability in real-world clinical setting, followed by pilot testing to evaluate the efficacy of the decision support tool.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Patient Inclusion Criteria

  • Women aged 65 years or older
  • Must write and speak English
  • Must have been diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer
  • Must have made decision to either receive or not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Must be within 3 months of breast cancer neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy treatment decision
  • Self-reported no visual or auditory deficits
  • SUBAIM 2b: Women aged 65 years or older
  • SUBAIM 2b: Must write and speak English
  • SUBAIM 2b: Must have been diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer
  • SUBAIM 2b: Must be a candidate for chemotherapy or targeted therapy (in the setting of HER2+ breast cancer)
  • SUBAIM 2b: Must be making a decision regarding chemotherapy
  • SUBAIM 2b: Self-reported no visual or auditory deficits
  • PHYSICIAN INCLUSION CRITERIA
  • Physician for patient recruited to participate in study (physician criteria)

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Intervention Arm

Participants in the intervention arm only will then be asked to look at the decision tool that includes educational materials about the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

These could be written information, graphics, videos, animations, or questionnaires.

This decision tool will personalize the decision to you specifically and support your decision-making process

Participate in interview
Complete questionnaire
Participate in discussion
Other Names:
  • Discuss
No Intervention: Non-Intervention Arm
Participants undergo interviews and complete questionnaires over 1-2 hours. Patients and physicians also participate in a discussion and complete shared decision-making questionnaire over 15-30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision making needs assessment questionnaire
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The mean score of the shared decision making questionnaire and its standard deviation along with the median and the range will be computed for both the patient and physician study population. Score Range-(0-4) 0-Not at all confident 4-very confident
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meghan Karuturi, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 23, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-0055 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2021-07005 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Interview

Subscribe