Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Evobrutinib and Transporter Substrates

A Phase I, Open-Label, Two-Part Study of the Effect of Multiple-Dose Evobrutinib on Transporter Substrates Digoxin, Metformin, Rosuvastatin, and Sumatriptan Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Participants

This study consisted of 2 parts: Part 1 and 2. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety and tolerability of multiple doses of evobrutinib on single doses of digoxin, metformin and rosuvastatin in Part-1 and sumatriptan in Part-2 of the study.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Healthy
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Digoxin (0.25mg); Drug: Metformin (10mg); Drug: Rosuvastatin (10mg); Drug: Evobrutinib (45mg); Drug: Sumatriptan (25mg)

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 40
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Germany
  • Neu-Ulm, Germany, 89231
    • Nuvisan GmBH

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 55 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Participants were overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation, including no clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination or laboratory evaluation and no active clinically significant disorder, condition, infection or disease that would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion
• Participants had a body weight within 50.0 and 100.0 kilograms [kg] (inclusive) and body mass index within the range of 19.0 and 30.0 kilograms per square meter [kg/m^2] (inclusive)
• Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion Criteria:

• History or presence of clinically relevant respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, hematological, lymphatic, neurological, cardiovascular, psychiatric, musculoskeletal, genitourinary, immunological, dermatological, connective tissue diseases or disorders, as determined by medical evaluation
• Individuals with diagnosis of hemochromatosis, Wilson´s disease, alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency, or any other chronic liver disease including Gilbert's disease were excluded from the study
• Prior history of cholecystectomy or splenectomy, and any clinically relevant surgery within 6 months prior to Screening
• History of any malignancy
• History of chronic or recurrent acute infection or any bacterial, viral, parasitic or fungal infections within 30 days prior to Screening and at any time between Screening and admission, or hospitalization due to infection within 6 months prior to Screening
• History of shingles within 12 months prior to Screening
• History of drug hypersensitivity, ascertained or presumptive allergy/hypersensitivity to the active drug substance and/or formulation ingredients; history of serious allergic reactions leading to hospitalization or any other hypersensitivity reaction in general, which may affect the safety of the participant and/or outcome of the study per the Investigator's discretion
• History of alcoholism or drug abuse within 2 years prior to Screening, or positive for drugs of abuse, nicotine/cotinine or alcohol by the laboratory assays conducted during Screening and Day -1
• History of residential exposure to tuberculosis, or a positive QuantiFERON® test within 4 weeks prior to or at the time of Screening
• Administration of live vaccines or live-attenuated virus vaccines within 3 months prior to Screening
• Moderate or strong inhibitors or inducers of Cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A (CYP3A4/5) within 4 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention
• Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

6

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Part 1: Cocktail (Day 1); Participants received single oral dose of Cocktail (digoxin 0.25 mg tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Day 1 in Part 1 under fed conditions.	Drug: Digoxin (0.25mg); Participants received single oral dose of digoxin tablet (0.25 mg) on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.; Drug: Metformin (10mg); Participants received single oral dose of metformin 10 mg solution on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.; Drug: Rosuvastatin (10mg); Participants received single oral dose of rosuvastatin tablet (10 mg) on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.
Experimental: Part 1: Evobrutinib (Days 4 to 12); Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 under fed conditions.	Drug: Evobrutinib (45mg); Participants received film-coated Evobrutinib tablet at a dose of 45 milligrams (mg), orally twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 and Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.; Other Names: M2951
Experimental: Part 1: Evobrutinib + Cocktail (Day 10); Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day and cocktail (digoxin 0.25 mg tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.	Drug: Digoxin (0.25mg); Participants received single oral dose of digoxin tablet (0.25 mg) on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.; Drug: Metformin (10mg); Participants received single oral dose of metformin 10 mg solution on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.; Drug: Rosuvastatin (10mg); Participants received single oral dose of rosuvastatin tablet (10 mg) on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions.; Drug: Evobrutinib (45mg); Participants received film-coated Evobrutinib tablet at a dose of 45 milligrams (mg), orally twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 and Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.; Other Names: M2951
Experimental: Part 2: Sumatriptan (Day 1); Participants received single oral dose of Sumatriptan 25 mg tablet on Day 1 in Part 2 under fed conditions.	Drug: Sumatriptan (25mg); Participants received single dose of sumatriptan tablet (25 mg) on Day 1 and Day 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.
Experimental: Part 2: Evobrutinib (Days 2 to 8); Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day on Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.	Drug: Evobrutinib (45mg); Participants received film-coated Evobrutinib tablet at a dose of 45 milligrams (mg), orally twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 and Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.; Other Names: M2951
Experimental: Part 2: Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan (Day 8); Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day and single oral dose of Sumatriptan 25 mg tablet on Day 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.	Drug: Evobrutinib (45mg); Participants received film-coated Evobrutinib tablet at a dose of 45 milligrams (mg), orally twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 and Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.; Other Names: M2951; Drug: Sumatriptan (25mg); Participants received single dose of sumatriptan tablet (25 mg) on Day 1 and Day 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Digoxin	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Metformin	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Rosuvastatin	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Sumatriptan	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Digoxin	Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin	Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Rosuvastatin	Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sumatriptan	Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs	An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. Serious AE: an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAE: AE with onset after start of treatment or with onset date before the treatment start date but worsening after the treatment start date. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.	Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity	Severity of TEAEs were graded using Qualitative Toxicity Scale, as follows: Mild: Participant is aware of the event or symptom, but the event or symptom is easily tolerated; Moderate: Participant experiences sufficient discomfort to interfere with or reduce his or her usual level of activity; Severe: Significant impairment of functioning: the participant is unable to carry out his or her usual activities. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported.	Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters	Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis. Clinical meaningful changes were determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported.	Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs	Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported.	Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8
Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings	12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings were reported.	Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Digoxin	Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Metformin	Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Rosuvastatin	Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sumatriptan	Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8
Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Digoxin	T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Metformin	T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Rosuvastatin	T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Sumatriptan	T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Digoxin	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Metformin	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Rosuvastatin	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Sumatriptan	The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8
Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Digoxin	CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification; Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Metformin	CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Rosuvastatin	CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Sumatriptan	CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8
Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Digoxin	Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Metformin	Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Rosuvastatin	Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Sumatriptan	Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8
Part 1: Cumulative Amount Excreted (CAE) From Time Zero to the End of the Collection Interval After Dosing Dosing (Ae0-36) of Metformin	Ae0-36 was calculated as the cumulative amount excreted from time zero (= dosing time) to the end of the collection interval after dosing, for metformin only. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12; 12 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10
Part 1: Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin	CLr was calculated as Ae0-36 divided by AUC0-36, for metformin only. AUC0-36: AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to 36 hours post-dose (metformin only) calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure.	Pre-dose, 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12; 12 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
• Investigators: Study Director: Medical Responsible, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• Medical Information Location Map - Med Info Contacts
• Trial Awareness and Transparency website

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 4, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 10, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): December 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 23, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 23, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): October 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): December 5, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 20, 2025
• Last Verified: November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Evobrutinib; Metformin; Rosuvastatin; Digoxin; Sumatriptan; Drug interaction; Clinical Pharmacology
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Sulfur Compounds; Organic Chemicals; Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring; Heterocyclic Compounds; Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring; Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring; Hydrocarbons; Carbohydrates; Polycyclic Compounds; Glycosides; Amides; Indoles; Pyrimidines; Steroids; Fused-Ring Compounds; Hydrocarbons, Halogenated; Biguanides; Guanidines; Amidines; Sulfonamides; Sulfones; Tryptamines; Fluorobenzenes; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Digitalis Glycosides; Cardenolides; Cardiac Glycosides; Cardanolides; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Digoxin; Metformin; Sumatriptan; evobrutinib
• Other Study ID Numbers: MS200527_0078; 2021-001923-42 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and the European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No