Study of the Criteria for Choosing Speedicath Catheters During the Initiation of Self-catheterization (Eva)

March 10, 2022 updated by: Laboratoires Coloplast S.A.S
To date, there is no objective data to help in the choice of the type of catheter to offer to the patient according to his or her needs. Although it is now known that the quality of life of patients practicing intermittent self catheterisation is dependent on multiple factors, there is little data on the factors that facilitate or hinder adherence to intermittent self catheterisation during the first six months after initiation of intermittent self catheterisation. The prospective multicenter exploratory observational study that the sponsor wishes to conduct aims to determine what criteria preside over patient choice of SpeedyCath (SC) leads. This information would allow us to set up a personalized advice with each patient in the future, with the aim of proposing the SC catheter best adapted to his needs. The study population will consist of adults with neurogenic or non-neurogenic urinary disorders that warrant the use of intermittent self catheterisation, with intermittent self catheterisation education occurring at the time of inclusion. Patients should be autonomous in the practice of intermittent self catheterisation, and the minimum expected duration of follow-up should be greater than or equal to 6 months. Only patients who choose to use SpeediCath leads will be included in the study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Urinary self-catheterization consists of emptying the bladder oneself by inserting a catheter into the urethra. It is the reference method in case of dysfunctions of the bladder emptying phase, in particular in case of complete urinary retention or complete or incomplete bladder emptying with sub bladder obstruction. Neurological pathologies such as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, multisystematic atrophy, peripheral neuropathies, Parkinson's disease, and stroke, may be the cause of bladder disturbances. These disturbances may also be caused by pelvic denervations as a result of enlarged pelvic surgeries or radiotherapy for the treatment of gynecological, urological or digestive cancers.

The objective of the implementation of intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) is to reduce the morbidity related to bladder and bowel dysfunction and to improve the quality of life of patients by making them more autonomous.

It involves a rigorous learning phase for the patient and a phase of acceptance of this new mictional mode.

When ISC is indicated, training is provided to the patient to enable him/her to manage daily catheterization. The objectives of this training are to understand, perform, monitor and adapt self-care. This training, mainly provided by the nursing staff and/or a specialist physician, is usually provided during a hospitalization. After returning home, the patient continues to be monitored by the specialist physician and the nursing team to evaluate the mastery of the technique (possibly reviewing the gesture and ensuring the adequacy of the catheter), the patient's adaptation to the practice of ISC, his compliance with the associated rules (frequency and regularity of catheterization, volume of urine) and any complications. A first visit is usually made between 3 and 12 weeks, then a second one after 6 months of use.

However, this therapeutic patient education (TPE), even when carried out by trained personnel, is not necessarily sufficient for immediate acceptance and adherence to self-catheterization in the medium to long term.

It is important that the patient is involved in his or her choice of equipment, since the decision to self-catheterize is usually made by the physician, and that the benefits of self-catheterization outweigh the constraints. The patient must be guided and involved in the choice of catheter during this learning phase, which will ensure better compliance and future adherence to treatment.

The interest of this study is therefore to better understand the real motivations of the patient in the choice of the catheter. This will undoubtedly make it possible to improve either the equipment itself or certain FTE sequences in the future by insisting on the problematic or questioning points in terms of the choice of catheter proposed to the patient by the caregiver. The determinants of the patient's choice are all the more important as there are a very large number of catheters on the market.

Coloplast offers the SpeediCath® (SC) range of ready-to-use self-lubricating hydrophilic catheters. This range is designed to cover the different needs of patients, providing them with probes of different length, flexibility, shape and ergonomics. There are 3 types of catheters adapted to women (SC Standard®, SC Compact® and SC Compact Set, SC Compact Eve®), and 3 types of catheters adapted to men (SC Standard®, SC Compact® and SC Compact Set, SC Flex®).

Concerning the technical specificities, a systematic review of the literature concluded that hydrophilic catheters (with a lubricant attached to the catheter) provide a benefit in terms of safety and quality of life, particularly in patients with spinal cord injuries. SC® catheters significantly reduce trauma to the urinary tract by reducing friction. Another study also showed that SpeediCath catheters were significantly faster, more convenient, and more discreet to use than a non-ready-to-use hydrophilic catheter (need to activate lubricant). The superiority of SpeediCath Compact Male and Female catheters in terms of quality of life compared to reference catheters was demonstrated in a randomized study using the specific validated ISC-Q questionnaire and has been retained and valued by the CNEDiMTS

To date, there is no objective data to help in the choice of the type of catheter to propose to the patient according to his needs. Although it is now known that the quality of life of patients using ISC is dependent on multiple factors, there is little data on the factors that facilitate or hinder adherence to ISC during the first six months after initiation of ISC. The prospective multicenter exploratory observational study that the sponsor wishes to conduct aims to determine the criteria that govern patient choice of SC leads. This information would allow us to set up a personalized advice with each patient in the future, with the aim of proposing the SC catheter best adapted to his needs. The study population will consist of adults with neurogenic or non-neurogenic urinary disorders that warrant the use of ISC, with ISC education occurring at the time of inclusion. Patients should be autonomous in the practice of ISC, and the minimum expected duration of follow-up should be greater than or equal to 6 months. Only patients who have chosen to use SpeediCath leads will be included in the study.

Numerous criteria will be collected to allow a detailed analysis of the modalities of choice of the type of SC probe. This collection involves the use of self-questionnaires for the patients. These questionnaires will be collected during the usual follow-up of the patient, including a visit at the time of the ASI education, a follow-up visit around 3 to 12 weeks (depending on the practices of the investigating center) and a second follow-up visit around 6 months.

Acceptance of ISC will be measured by the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT). This is a patient questionnaire developed by the Groupe d'Études de Neuro-Urologie de Langue Française (GENULF) and validated in French in 2016 during a prospective multicenter study of 201 neurological and non-neurological patients. The I-CAT allows for a better assessment and understanding of the psychological barriers encountered by patients in relation to ISC. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions, with a minimum score of 0 for perfect acceptance and a maximum score of 56 characterizing the least possible acceptance.

The difficulties encountered by patients during ASI will be measured by the "Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire" IC-Di-Q. This is a patient questionnaire validated in French, and its purpose is to evaluate the difficulties encountered during the performance of ISA. In 13 questions, it explores numerous factors such as pain, blockage, bleeding, spasticity, and urethral sphincter spasm, in terms of frequency of occurrence and intensity. The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify the difficulties encountered by patients, and to monitor their evolution after the implementation of alternatives or solutions (including the adaptation of the type of catheter).

Patient adherence to ISC will be measured by the Intermittent Catheterization Adherence Scale (I-CAS). This is a patient questionnaire validated in French with 8 questions, 7 of which have a binary answer (yes/no), and one with 5 suggested answers. The score ranges from 0 for strong adherence to ISC to 8 for very weak adherence.

A study-specific self-questionnaire was also created with the support of the Scientific Advisory Board to determine the reasons for the patient's choice of catheter. This questionnaire includes criteria independent of the patient (e.g. advice from the nurse), and criteria specific to the patient (e.g. ease of use, discretion).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Murielle Loock
  • Phone Number: frmlk@coloplast.com

Study Locations

      • Aulnay sous bois, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier d'Aulnay sous bois
        • Contact:
          • Béatrice Davenne
      • Aulnay sous-bois, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Robert Ballanger
        • Contact:
          • Emmanuel Van Glabeke
      • Auterive, France
        • Recruiting
        • Centre auterive
        • Contact:
          • Sophie Rouleaud
      • Berck, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Calvé- Fondation Hopale
        • Contact:
          • Jean Gabriel Prévinaire
      • Bruges, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tour de Gassies
        • Contact:
          • Amandine Grelier
      • Caen, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Caen
        • Contact:
          • Antoine Desvergée
      • Chalon-sur-Saône, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier William Morey
        • Contact:
          • Nicolas Koutlidis
      • Chamalières, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Médical Germaine Revel
        • Contact:
          • Vivien Reynaud
      • Colmar, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hopitaux civil de Colmar
        • Contact:
          • Amine Messaoudi
      • Dijon, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Le Bocage
        • Contact:
          • Céline Duperron
      • Garches, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
        • Contact:
          • Alexia Even
      • Gonesse, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse
        • Contact:
          • Mohamed Marouane Hmida
      • La Tronche, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU GrenobleAlpes
        • Contact:
          • Caroline Thuillier
      • Lille, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Swynghedauw
        • Contact:
          • Anne Blanchard
      • Limoges, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Limoges
      • Marseille, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Clinique Saint Martin
        • Contact:
          • Karine Lenne Aurier
      • Marsillargues, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Timonnes
        • Contact:
          • Camino Muro Guerra
      • Montpellier, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Lapeyronie
        • Contact:
          • Laurent Cabaniols
      • Montpellier, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Institut Mutualiste Montpelliérain- Beau soleil
        • Contact:
          • Grégoire Poinas
      • Nancy, France
        • Recruiting
        • Chu de Nancy
        • Contact:
          • Pierre Lecoanet
      • Nantes, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Saint Jacques
        • Contact:
          • Bénédicte Reiss
      • Nice, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Pasteur 2 - CHU de NICE
        • Contact:
          • Imad Bentellis
      • Paris, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hopital Tenon
        • Contact:
          • Gérard Amarenco
      • Paris, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière
      • Perpignan, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre PSR
        • Contact:
          • Redha Benbouzid
      • Ploemeur, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CMMRF Kerpape
        • Contact:
          • Jacques Kerdraon
      • Reims, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Reims
        • Contact:
          • Richard Seret
      • Rennes, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Rennes
        • Contact:
          • Benoit Peyronnet
      • Roubaix, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Victor Provo
        • Contact:
          • François Pecoux
      • Rouen, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hopital Charles Nicolle
        • Contact:
          • Maximilien Baron
      • Rouen, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU Rouen
        • Contact:
          • Jean-Nicolas CORNU
      • Saint Genis Laval, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
        • Contact:
          • Amandine Guinet-Lacoste
      • Saint-Genis-Laval, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
        • Contact:
          • Damien Waz
      • Saint-Saturnin, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre de l'Arche
        • Contact:
          • Gaelle Audat
      • Saint-Étienne, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital Bellevue, CHU de SAINT ETIENNE
        • Contact:
          • Julia Touly
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nouvel Hopital Civil
        • Contact:
          • Thibault Tricard
      • Toulouse, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Toulouse Rangueil
      • Tours, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chu Tours

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will be offered to all adult subjects with neurogenic or non-neurogenic urinary disorders, newly initiated to ISC, and using the SpeediCath line of catheters.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female or male, 18 years of age or older
  • Subject having been informed of the study and having decided to participate (no opposition)
  • Subject affiliated to a social security system or entitled to it
  • Subject with neurogenic or non-neurogenic urinary disorders, justifying the use of the ISC to empty the bladder
  • Subjects who have received their first ISC education at the time of inclusion
  • Subject with an expected duration of ISC of at least 6 months
  • Subject has been presented with at least two types of SC catheters and has chosen to use the SpeediCath line of catheters as their first self-catheterization catheter
  • Able to perform ISC independently
  • Subjects who have been recommended by their healthcare professional to perform catheterization at least 4 times per day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable subject according to the regulations in force
  • Pregnant, parturient or nursing woman;
  • Subject deprived of liberty by judicial, medical or administrative decision;
  • Minor subject ;
  • Subject protected by law or unable to give consent
  • Subject who is not affiliated or not a beneficiary of a social security system;
  • Subject falling into several of the above categories;
  • Subject who has refused to participate in the study
  • Subject participating in an interventional clinical study
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, have cognitive problems that prevent them from answering a questionnaire or for whom assessment could be problematic.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
Adult subjects with neurogenic or non-neurogenic urinary tract disorders, newly initiated to ASI, and users of the SpeediCath line of catheters.
Patients using SC catheters will be followed up in order to understand the major criteria in the choice of the catheter by the patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient questionnaire for the choice of the catheter
Time Frame: At visit 3 : 6 months
A study-specific self-administered questionnaire was created with the support of the Scientific Advisory Board to determine the reasons for the patient's choice of catheter. This questionnaire contains 18 questions, including criteria independent of the patient (e.g. advice from the nurse), and criteria specific to the patient (e.g. ease of use, discretion).
At visit 3 : 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient questionnaire for the choice of the catheter
Time Frame: At baseline
A study-specific self-administered questionnaire was created with the support of the Scientific Advisory Board to determine the reasons for the patient's choice of catheter. This questionnaire contains 18 questions, including criteria independent of the patient (e.g. advice from the nurse), and criteria specific to the patient (e.g. ease of use, discretion).
At baseline
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At visit 2 : 3 to 12 weeks
Determined by a 0 to 5 points visual analog scale, 0 is the worst possible satisfaction, and 5 is the best possible satisfaction
At visit 2 : 3 to 12 weeks
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At visit 3 : 6 months
Determined by a 0 to 5 points visual analog scale, 0 is the worst possible satisfaction, and 5 is the best possible satisfaction
At visit 3 : 6 months
"Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire" IC-Di-Q
Time Frame: At visit 2 : 3 to 12 weeks
This is a patient questionnaire validated in French.The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify the difficulties encountered by the patients and to follow their evolution after the implementation of alternatives or solutions (including the adaptation of the type of catheter). In 13 questions, it explores numerous factors such as pain, blockage, bleeding, spasticity, and urethral sphincter spasm, in terms of frequency of occurrence and intensity.
At visit 2 : 3 to 12 weeks
"Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire" IC-Di-Q
Time Frame: At visit 3 : 6 months
This is a patient questionnaire validated in French.The purpose of this questionnaire is to identify the difficulties encountered by the patients and to follow their evolution after the implementation of alternatives or solutions (including the adaptation of the type of catheter). In 13 questions, it explores numerous factors such as pain, blockage, bleeding, spasticity, and urethral sphincter spasm, in terms of frequency of occurrence and intensity.
At visit 3 : 6 months
Catheterization Adherence Scale (I-CAS)
Time Frame: At visit 2 : 3 to 12 weeks
This is a patient questionnaire validated in French with 8 questions, 7 of which have a binary response (yes/no), and one with 5 suggested answers. The score ranges from 0 for strong adherence to ASI to 8 for very weak adherence.
At visit 2 : 3 to 12 weeks
Catheterization Adherence Scale (I-CAS)
Time Frame: At visit 3 : 6 months
This is a patient questionnaire validated in French with 8 questions, 7 of which have a binary response (yes/no), and one with 5 suggested answers. The score ranges from 0 for strong adherence to ASI to 8 for very weak adherence.
At visit 3 : 6 months
Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline
The I-CAT allows for a better assessment and understanding of the psychological barriers encountered by patients in relation to ISA. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions, with a minimum score of 0 for perfect acceptance and a maximum score of 56 characterizing the least possible acceptance.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gérard AMARENCO, Pr., MD, Hopital Tenon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-A00579-32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Retention

Clinical Trials on SpeediCath® catheters

3
Subscribe