Discovery and Analytical Validation of Inflammatory Bio-signatures of the Human Pain Experience

December 1, 2023 updated by: Alan Prossin
The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which will be performed while simultaneously quantifying mu-opioid receptor activity in the brain via [11C]-carfentanil PET neuroimaging in healthy subjects. Another objective is to evaluate whether an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces activation of IL-1b (minocycline) will perturb the balance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines and effect a reduction in pain experienced (and endogenous opioids released) during the experimental, nociceptive pain challenge. A final objective is to evaluate performance characteristics (sensitivity, accuracy, dynamic range) of the biosignature for the purpose of predicting post-operative pain.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Lack of precision in tools that quantify risk and assess presentation of post-operative pain poses substantial burden to prevention and treatment and is a major contributor to the nationwide opioid epidemic. Enhanced precision in post- operative pain care requires quantitative tools that individualize assessment of widely variant human pain experiences, accounting for variance in intensity, threshold, and in both affective and sensory components of pain. No currently available measure is sufficiently sensitive, accurate, and reliable to account for the wide variance in risk or clinical presentation of post-operative pain that is required to impact best practices. To address this unmet need, we will discover (R61 phase) and validate (R33 phase) a novel, fit-for-purpose, objective bio-signature that is sensitive, accurate, and reliable in predicting risk (and presentation) of post-operative pain states following a elective cosmetic surgery (e.g. abdominoplasty), a body contouring surgery frequently performed and associated with post-operative pain.

Evidence suggests it is biologically plausible to develop a bio-signature of the human pain experience that derives from IL-1 family cytokine activity. In animal models, imbalance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokines is readily induced pharmacologically and surgically, enhancing pain behavior, central endogenous opioid release, and tolerance to opioid analgesics, all factors that contribute to chronicity. Pharmacologic blockade of pro-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines with soluble IL-1ra reverses the pro-nociceptive effects. Evidence suggests similar relationships exist in humans. Concentration of IL-1b sampled intra-operatively from wound site blood revealed predicts surgical complications and post-operative pain. However, IL-1b (on its own) has not proven sufficiently accurate, sensitive, or reliable to account for the broad inter-individual variance in risk and clinical presentation of human post-operative pain states. In preliminary data from separate regression analyses, neither IL-1b nor IL-1ra significantly predicted pain (intensity or threshold). However, regression models incorporating both IL-1b and IL-1ra showed that imbalance between these 2 factors (pro-nociceptive IL-1bias) synergistically enhanced prediction of pain (intensity and threshold) and underlying endogenous opioid release during a standardized pain challenge, accounting for 20% of the pain variance. IL-1b (pro-nociceptive) was a positive predictor and IL-1ra (anti-nociceptive) a negative predictor of pain. Including additional variance factors (sex, mu-opioid receptor polymorphism, neuroticism) in the model accounted for another 5% of the pain variance. Pain variance factors can impact concentration of additional IL-1 cytokines that regulate IL-1 signaling, suggesting it is both biologically and statistically plausible that incorporating a wide array of IL-1 family cytokines (IL-1b, IL-1ra, IL-1a, sIL-1r1, IL-1RAcP, IL-18, IL-18bp, IL-18Ra, IL-18Rb, IL-36, IL-38, IL-33, sTLR4) into a broader bio-signature of IL-1 family cytokine activity will perform superior to simple measures of IL-1bias (that include only IL-1b and IL-1ra) in predicting the highly heterogeneous human post-operative pain experience.

This study phase focuses on discovery (and analytic validation) of a novel, bio-signature of risk for post-operative pain states and underlying opioid-cytokine interactions. Performance (accuracy, sensitivity, dynamic range) in predicting experimental and post-operative pain will be tested in n=70 healthy humans following elective abdominoplasty.

More Specifically, The first objective of the study is to evaluate whether a novel bio-signature (derived from a wide range of pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 family cytokine activity) will predict pain experienced and also release of underlying endogenous opioid neurotransmitters during an experimental nociceptive pain challenge, which will be performed while simultaneously quantifying mu-opioid receptor activity in the brain via [11C]-carfentanil PET neuroimaging in healthy subjects. Another objective is to evaluate whether an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces activation of IL-1b (anakinra) will perturb the balance between pro- and anti-nociceptive IL-1 cytokines and effect a reduction in pain experienced (and endogenous opioids released) during the experimental, nociceptive pain challenge. A final objective is to evaluate performance characteristics (sensitivity, accuracy, dynamic range) of the biosignature for the purpose of predicting post-operative pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Obese or non-obese
  • Awaiting elective surgery
  • Negative urine pregnancy test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active, severe medical or psychiatric illness (per DSM-V)
  • History of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms with or without presence of a DSM-V depressive and/or anxiety disorder
  • Current or recent (within past 3 months) suicidal thoughts/plans/attempts
  • Current or recent (within past 3 months) substance use/abuse/dependence (Note: stable nicotine use is acceptable, non-risky alcohol use is acceptable)
  • Active or chronic medical illness (except obesity: either obese or non-obese volunteers can enroll in the study).
  • MRI exclusion criteria including presence of non-MRI-safe medical device(s), magnetizable objects in soft tissue, severe claustrophobia, etc.
  • Recent (past year) PET scan(s).
  • Lifetime excessive radiation exposure that would be exclusionary via standards of the local radiation safety committee.
  • Current medication treatment that would impact measures of interest.
  • Current pregnancy or recent (within the past 2 months) intercourse without an acceptable contraceptive method
  • Exclusion criteria for Anakinra treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge, then anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge
Pharmacological challenge (with placebo) plus nociceptive pain challenge, then pharmacological challenge (with anakinra) plus nociceptive pain challenge
intravenous injection of 100 milligrams anakinra
Other Names:
  • Kineret
intravenous injection of 1 milliliter normal saline
Other Names:
  • Inert Substance
The experimental, standardized, nociceptive pain challenge will induce a moderate level of sustained pain. The pain challenge involves a masseteric injection in the left or right jaw muscle of normal saline (0.15 ml bolus of 0.9% normal saline) over a 15 second period followed by continuous infusion via a closed loop infusion system for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Pain Induction
Experimental: Anakinra plus nociceptive pain challenge, then placebo plus nociceptive pain challenge
Pharmacological challenge (with anakinra) plus nociceptive pain challenge, then pharmacological challenge (with placebo) plus nociceptive pain challenge
intravenous injection of 100 milligrams anakinra
Other Names:
  • Kineret
intravenous injection of 1 milliliter normal saline
Other Names:
  • Inert Substance
The experimental, standardized, nociceptive pain challenge will induce a moderate level of sustained pain. The pain challenge involves a masseteric injection in the left or right jaw muscle of normal saline (0.15 ml bolus of 0.9% normal saline) over a 15 second period followed by continuous infusion via a closed loop infusion system for 20 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Pain Induction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 0 minutes, This represents the study baseline, prior to any brain imaging
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
0 minutes, This represents the study baseline, prior to any brain imaging
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 90 minutes, upon completion of brain imaging
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
90 minutes, upon completion of brain imaging
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 to 24 hours before elective surgery
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
12 to 24 hours before elective surgery
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 to 48 hours after elective surgery
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
24 to 48 hours after elective surgery
Pain as assessed by total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 to 8 weeks after elective surgery
The total pain score on the McGill Pain Questionnaire ranges from 0-78, with a higher score indicating greater pain.
6 to 8 weeks after elective surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alan R Prossin, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 7, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-19-0627
  • R61NS113316 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on anakinra

Subscribe