- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05076994
The PET Project: Patient Education Tool for Home Exercise (PET)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Musculoskeletal conditions are a very common, if not the most common, reason to visit the family doctor, comprising an estimated one-in-six to over half6 of all primary care visits. Under this umbrella of musculoskeletal conditions fall many different aliments: this paper will investigate chronic nonspecific low back pain and greater trochanter pain syndrome.
Boasting titles for greatest number of disability-years caused by a disease and most common non-communicable disease, one would hope that researchers and clinicians would thoroughly understand what causes this pervasive morbidity. Unfortunately, when it comes to chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP), no clear pathoanatomic cause is attributed to the symptoms.
Low back pain is localized below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds and is deemed chronic when it lasts for more than 12-weeks. Although most cases of low back pain seem to resolve prior to the 12-week mark, chronic low back pain is responsible for the vast majority of workers' compensation costs. In 90% of cases of chronic low back pain, clinicians cannot pinpoint the etiology, hence the 'non-specific' modifier.
Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) boasts a slightly less impressive resume - affecting a mere 10% to 25% of the general population. GTPS presents as lateral hip pain, specifically over the greater trochanter, and is worse when lying or bearing weight on that side.
It too has a plethora of potential aetiologies, and although it can be challenging to elucidate lateral hip pain's true etiology this clinical diagnosis comprises of trochanteric bursitis, gluteus medius and minimus tendinopathies, and external coxa saltans (commonly referred to as "snapping hip").
CNLBP and GTPS seem to coexist in about a third of the time and general treatment recommendations are similar. They range from analgesic medication to load management, though because between CNLBP and GTPS, a wide demographic is affected, treatments should be accessible and applicable to the wider population. Exercise therapies generally to meet these criteria. Exercise has also routinely demonstrated to be efficacious, cost-effective and low risk.
A multitude of different exercise modalities have routinely been shown to reduce chronic pain and improve physical function. Furthermore, specific exercises can be leveraged to treat chronic pain of broad aetiologies. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses alike have shown these to hold true in the realm of chronic non-specific low back pain as well. Commonly communicated is the relative paucity of research on GTPS, however, minimizing pain and performing strengthening and stretching exercises for the region appears to be a mainstay of the current therapy.
It is well known that exercise program adherence is a major issue when it comes to exercise interventions. A minimum level of adherence must be obtained for an exercise intervention to be efficacious. And when that level of adherence is attained in patients with CNLPB, exercise-based programs have shown to decrease pain and improve function. Similar results are show in the little amount of research on exercise therapies for GTPS, and in clinical practice it is assumed to be true.
Adherence is higher when people are highly supervised. So it is unsurprising that patients have higher rates of adherence after seeing their physiotherapist for extra 'booster' sessions. However, additional sessions with healthcare providers is not always feasible, due to high costs, poor accessibility, or unavailable providers, amongst other reasons. With the ever-increasing use of technology, though, patients can have somewhat similar care - such as guidance while doing exercises - through pre-recorded online videos. Some preliminary studies suggest that these online videos are able to increase patient adherence.
While many YouTube exercise rehabilitation videos are of high quality, there are also many that are not. This can leave the patient - even with an abundance of online resources - paradoxically without answers: unsure and unable to know what is relevant. Additionally, patients report better trust towards those who adequately understand their medical conditions, such as their healthcare team.
It would then be conceivable that physician-produced videos that are endorsed by the patient's healthcare team would alleviate this issue. Furthermore, it could circumvent the challenges associated with in-person care as well as alleviate some of the pitfalls of sifting through endless YouTube videos. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a patient education tool - an accompanying set of explanatory videos - will increase patient adherence when compared to prescribing an evidence-based, personalized set of exercises without these videos.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Steven Macaluso, MD
- Phone Number: 45062 5196854292
- Email: westernpetproject@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over 18 years old
- The ability to perform at least 5 of the 10 total exercises, as cleared by the physiatrist
- The willingness to comply with the study criteria for its 12-week duration
- The written informed consent of the participant
- Sufficient English comprehension to understand the questionnaires
- Sufficient English comprehension to consent to the study
Chronic lower back pain:
o A history of lower back pain exceeding 3 months
Greater trochanter pain syndrome:
- A history of lateral hip pain exceeding 3 months
- Pain in at least three of the following tests: palpation of the greater trochanter, FABER test, resisted external de-rotation test, modified resisted external de-rotation test
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Condition that makes the exercising ill advisable, as determined by the physiatrist
Chronic lower back pain:
- Known lumbar disc herniation
- Acute phase of lumbar disc protrusion
- Known vertebral fractures
- Known infectious, inflammatory, or malignant diseases of the vertebrae
- Known presence of severe spinal deformity
Greater trochanter pain syndrome:
- Acute hip pathology such as fracture, dislocation, infection, etc.
- Known diagnosis moderate to severe hip osteoarthritis causing significant range of motion restriction
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Care
|
An exercise prescription and verbal instructions in clinic
|
|
Experimental: Patient Education Tool
|
A series of home exercise videos to improve patient adherence to exercise prescription
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain
Time Frame: 0 weeks (Day of entry to trial)
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ("No Pain" on one end of scale (0 out of 100), and "Worse pain you can imagine" on the opposite end of the scale (100 out of 100)
|
0 weeks (Day of entry to trial)
|
|
Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ("No Pain" on one end of scale (0 out of 100), and "Worse pain you can imagine" on the opposite end of the scale (100 out of 100)
|
6 weeks
|
|
Pain
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ("No Pain" on one end of scale (0 out of 100), and "Worse pain you can imagine" on the opposite end of the scale (100 out of 100)
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exercise Adherence Rate
Time Frame: Number of exercises performed each 1 day (24 hours). Data collected once weekly for 12 weeks via online automated survey.
|
Daily log of adherence to the exercise prescribed is recorded by participants and submitted on a weekly basis.
|
Number of exercises performed each 1 day (24 hours). Data collected once weekly for 12 weeks via online automated survey.
|
|
Self efficacy and confidence of participants
Time Frame: 0 weeks (day of entry to program)
|
Use of the Self Efficacy in Exercise (SEE) standard survey to determine patients' level of confidence to complete the assigned exercises despite various barriers. Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question. This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise. |
0 weeks (day of entry to program)
|
|
Self efficacy and confidence of participants
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Use of the Self Efficacy in Exercise (SEE) standard survey to determine patients' level of confidence to complete the assigned exercises despite various barriers.
Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question.
This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90.
A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Self efficacy and confidence of participants
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Use of the Self Efficacy in Exercise (SEE) standard survey to determine patients' level of confidence to complete the assigned exercises despite various barriers.
Total score is calculated by summing the responses to each question.
This scale has a range of total scores from 0-90.
A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 119395
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedLower Back Pain | Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, Postural | Postural Low Back Pain | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Low Back Ache | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment | Low BackacheUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityIstinye UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, PosturalTurkey
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
General Incorporated Foundation Ryukyuseimeisaiseikai...CompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Non-specific Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain (LBP)Japan
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
Clinical Trials on Exercise therapy
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedInsertional Achilles TendinopathyBelgium
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompletedPatellofemoral Pain Syndrome
-
Proaxis TherapyVirginia Commonwealth University; Arcadia University; National Athletic Trainers...CompletedShoulder Impingement SyndromeUnited States
-
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training...Completedthe Effect of Virtual Reality on Stroke Rehabilitation
-
Taipei Medical UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandUnknownHip OsteoarthritisIreland
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedAchilles TendinopathyBelgium
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedTemporomandibular DisorderTurkey
-
George Washington UniversityCompletedPrematurityUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedHemiplegia | Gait, Hemiplegic | Motor Function | Balance; DistortedTurkey