Optimizing Positive Predicting Value of Prostate MRI (PROMOD)

June 14, 2022 updated by: Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia

Optimizing Positive Predicting Value of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the PRostate Mri Outcome Database (PROMOD)

The PROMOD study is an international multicenter retrospective Project. The aim is to create a comprehensive database that will include multiple heterogeneous cohorts in order to explore inter-center differences in the accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and to define optimal strategies for the selection of men at risk of clinically significant prostate cancer who might benefit from biopsies.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background:

In the recent years Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the prostate and targeted biopsy have been shown to substantially improve detection of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer (PCa) Gleason Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2, clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). In fact, 2020 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend performing MRI before prostate biopsy in men with prior negative prostate biopsy as well as in biopsy naive men with a clinical suspicion of PCa. If MRI is positive, a combination of targeted and systematic biopsy should be performed. If MRI is negative, biopsy could be omitted based on the clinical suspicion of PCa and a shared decision-making with the patient. Such approach binds the decision to perform biopsy to the clinical suspicion of PCa to be determined using MRI, risk calculators, and biomarkers. While several risk calculators and biomarkers have been developed and are currently under evaluation, the 'MRI pathway' is supported by level 1 evidence but seems to be limited by the low to moderate inter-reader and inter-center reproducibility and the low specificity/positive predictive value.

Additionally, several techniques for target prostate biopsies have been described but recent studies found no significant differences among various methods of MRI targeted biopsy for csPCa detection.

The aim of this international multicenter project is to create a comprehensive database including multiple heterogeneous cohorts in order to explore inter-center differences in the accuracy of MRI, and define optimal strategies for selection of men who might benefit from biopsies.

Objectives:

  1. To investigate variables (such as lesion size, lesion location, number of biopsy cores per lesion) affecting the Positive predictive value (PPV) of prostate MRI on lesion level and patient level.
  2. To explore inter-center differences in PPV of prostate MRI and possible reasons for such differences on lesion level and patient level
  3. To evaluated combined use of MRI with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other clinical variables (such as age, race, history of prior negative prostate biopsy, use of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, family history of PCa/csPCa) in A. men with a clinical suspicion of PCa, B. men with diagnosed prostate cancer on active surveillance
  4. To assess if there is an optimal cut-off of MRI suspicious scores and PSA density (PSAd) in each individual institution.

5) to assess the impact of patient selection on biopsy rate and number of men who could safely avoid biopsy despite MRI suspicious findings in per center and pooled data analyses

Outcome:

Histological evidence of Clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa), defined as Gleason score 3+4 or higher.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients who received prostate biopsy with a pre-biopsy MRI.
  • Additional inclusion criteria will be project-specific.

Methods:

Deidentified data from each cohort will be collected in a RedCap HIPPA compliant Database. Each center is responsible for the deidentification of the shared spreadsheet. The data handling center will be the University of Foggia (Foggia, Italy) and datasets will not be imported until data transfer agreements are complete between the institution sending data and the data handling center.

Data analysis Retrospective analyses of multiple prospective single- and multi-institutional clinical trials and cohort studies. The analysis will be performed on per center level as well using pooled dataset and will include comparisons of MRI and clinical, blood variables in men who underwent A. target biopsy only, B. targeted and systematic biopsy, C. systematic biopsy only. Decision curve analysis will be performed to assess the biopsy strategy with the higher clinical benefit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

5000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Puglia
      • Foggia, Puglia, Italy, 70100
        • university ospital: Ospedali Riiuniti di Foggia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients undergoing Prostate biopsy with a pre biopsy MRI and no previous treatmens

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who received prostate biopsy with a pre biopsy MRI.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who underwent previous treatments for prostate cancer Patients who underwent post biopsy MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with clinically significant prostate cancer detected at prostate biopsy
Time Frame: 3 to 5 weeks
Number of patients with histological evidence of clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as histologic Gleason Score 3+4 or higher) in prostate biopsy cores.
3 to 5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Prostate Magnetic resonance Imaging

Subscribe