Intraoral Scanners as a Motivation Method for Oral Hygiene Instruction (Perio3D)

April 2, 2025 updated by: CHU de Reims

Effectiveness of Intraoral Scanners as a Motivation Method for Oral Hygiene Instruction

Periodontal diseases are highly prevalent inflammatory diseases. These diseases are mostly due to the development and the maturation of bacterial plaque which lead to local inflammation. Individuals can develop severe attachment loss which could lead to dental loss. To prevent them, individual plaque removal procedures self-performed by the patient by tooth brushing or interdental brushes or made by professional care (scaling), are known to improve periodontal health, and thus to prevent periodontal diseases. Moreover, oral hygiene is a major factor to increase increasing the outcomes when treatments are needed. However, patients' compliance in oral health program is one of the major limits to periodontal therapeutics.

In this study, the investigators evaluate the effectiveness of 3D intra-oral camera compared with conventional oral hygiene instructions, to improve oral health motivation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The present study explores the effectiveness of intraoral scanners in the field of oral hygiene motivation and instruction to improve the patient's motivation.

Patients presenting periodontitis or gingivitis are recruited and randomized in 2 groups: conventional motivation procedures and conventional motivation procedures supported with 3D representations of their mouth obtained by intraoral scanners. Periodontal diseases (periodontitis and gingivitis) will be diagnosed according to the international classification of periodontal diseases, based on the decision-making algorithms. A periodontal charting, socio-demographic data and clinical data will be collected. Then, oral mucosa dermatological manifestations, treatment needs (ICDAS) and quality of life related to oral health (GOHAI) will be evaluated.

After inclusion, patients will be randomized between conventional motivation procedures and conventional motivation procedures associated with 3D intra oral procedures.

The investigators hypothesized that the 3D intra oral representations could improve oral hygiene in patients compared with those receiving only a classical motivation procedure. The primary objective is to evaluate if patients instructed to oral hygiene procedures using a representation of their mouth obtained by the use of a intraoral scanner present fewer plaque than the ones instructed without it. This could be achieved by the analysis of plaque control record index in both group.

The secondary objectives are :

  • To compare the evolution of the bleeding on probing clinical index between the two groups.
  • To compare the evolution of mean periodontal pocket depths, mean recessions and mean clinical attachment level between the two groups.
  • To compare the quality of life related to oral health between the two groups
  • To evaluate the time needed to add intraoral scans in the procedure
  • To evaluate the relevance of the received information.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Reims, France, 51092
        • CHU Reims

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients

  • consulting the Dental Care Service of the university hospital of Reims
  • presenting gingivitis or periodontal diseases according to the international classification of periodontal diseases (Chicago, 2017)
  • presenting at least 10 pairs of opposing teeth
  • able to perform oral hygiene procedures
  • speaking French
  • who signed the informed consent form
  • affiliated to the French Social Security system

Non-inclusion criteria :

Patients presenting :

  • a medical history likely to compromise protocol (psychiatric disorders, medical or pharmacological antecedents altering or modifying immune response in last 3 months)
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • eating disorders
  • orthodontic treatments
  • patients under legal protection, trusteeship or guardianship
  • unable to understand auto-questionary

Exclusion criteria :

Patients presenting :

  • presenting exacerbations signs of periodontal diseases
  • benefiting a professional plaque removal procedure outside of the experimental procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional motivation procedure
Conventional motivation procedures defined as a presentation of the modified Bass technique on a dental teaching macro model plus intra oral instruction provided in patient's mouth with a hand mirror.
No intervention
Experimental: Conventional motivation procedure supported by 3D representations
Conventional motivation procedures associated with 3D intra oral procedures. A 3D intra-oral modelization will added to the previously described procedure. Then, a periodontist will show the sites contaminated by dental plaque to the patient.
Cover key details of the intervention. Must be sufficiently detailed to distinguish between arms of a study and/or among similar interventions Intervention consists in an 3D intra oral representation of the oral cavity.
Other Names:
  • Conventional motivation procedures supported by 3D representations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque Control Record Evolution
Time Frame: Day 14

Recording the presence of plaque on individual tooth surfaces (mesial, distal, facial, lingual). The plaque is highlighted by a periodontal probe.

PCR is calculated according the following formula :

PCR = (Number of faces with plaque / Total number of faces) x 100

Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on No intervention

Subscribe