Integrated Hyperglycaemia Incentivised Postnatal Surveillance Study (I-HIPS) (I-HIPS)

January 30, 2023 updated by: KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Postpartum Type II Diabetes Mellitus in Asian Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

This study aims to test the following hypotheses in a randomized controlled trial of post-partum women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) that will be followed up for up to 4 years:

  1. Post-partum pregnancy is ideal for behavioural modification and adopting a healthy lifestyle. Using the continous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor and an exercise tracker will promote self-motivation and awareness by positive reinforcement and behavioural changes to improve diet, control body weight and increase physical activity in this group of post-partum women who are at high risk for developing Type II Diabetes.
  2. The use of the continous glycose monitoring (CGM) sensor and exercise tracker will motivate women to modify their dietary food intake and physical activity over time, reducing their cardiovascular risk factors for developing metabolic syndrome by lowering their baseline blood pressure, BMI, reducing their waist circumference and body fat mass, glycaemic levels and fasting lipids within the targeted healthy range.
  3. There will be an increase in the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained based on improvements in HbA1C and other proximal outcomes at the end of the trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The increased incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) resulting from increased insulin resistance has become a major health concern. GDM affects 5-10% of pregnant women in Europe, while the prevalence in Asian populations is significantly higher at approximately 15-20%. There is a need for early postpartum intervention strategies beginning soon after birth, but yet there are limited of such intervention studies conducted in Asia.

This is a randomized controlled trial and hospital-based study. A total of 300 post-partum women who attended KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) for antenatal consultation and were diagnosed with GDM using International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups (IADPSG) guidelines at KKH, with a BMI range from 20-40, and physically fit to participate in moderate intensity walking will be approached for prospective recruitment. These subjects will be followed-up to determine if they will have normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results at 6 weeks postpartum. If all the inclusion criteria is met, these women will be recruited into the study.

The recruited women will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. Those placed in the intervention group, which will also be known as the Wearable Care Group, will receive both a continous glucose monitoring (CGM) and an exercise tracker which will be a FitBit watch. Those placed in the control group, which will also be known as the Scheduled Care Group will receive standard medical care.

Participants randomized to both the control (Scheduled Care Group) and the intervention group (Wearable Care Group) will be followed up in the specialist outpatient clinics with a total of 7 visits for up to 4 years. Various testing will be carried out at relevant time points.

Data will be collected through questionnaires and clinical measurements. The questionnaires include socio-economic factors, a quality of life questionnaire, maternal diet, medical histories, lifestyle factors, health status, and home environment. Bio-physical measurements will be obtained from anthropometric measurements of participants, human biological materials such as blood, are collected from the participants at their follow-up time points with the I-HIPS study upon their consent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 229899
        • Recruiting
        • KK Women's and Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kok Hian Tan, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Phaik Ling Quah, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wai Kheong,Ryan Lee, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women diagnosed antenatally with GDM by IADPSG criteria (15)
  2. Normal 6 weeks post-natal OGTT
  3. BMI range from 20-40
  4. Physically fit to participate in moderate intensity walking

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with serious skin conditions (e.g. eczema) that precludes wearing the sensor for 14 days
  2. Women who have any other serious chronic disease such as chronic kidney disease and heart disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Wearable Care Group
This group will receive both a continous glucose monitoring sensor and an exercise tracker to be worn for at least 2 weeks at each study visit timepoint.

Continous glucose monitoring sensor: Study participants wear the sensor on the back of either right or left upper arm for up to 14 days. Glucose levels will be recorded from the interstitial fluid every 15 minutes using intermittent/ flash glucose scanning.

Exercise tracker: A FitBit watch will be given to the participants for use to track physical activity levels.

No Intervention: Scheduled Care Group
This group will receive standard medical care with dietary and nutritional advice alone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically diagnosed Type II Diabetes Mellitus
Time Frame: At 6 months (23-26 weeks) from baseline visit
Clinical outcomes of Type II Diabetes Mellitus development determined by oral glucose tolerance test
At 6 months (23-26 weeks) from baseline visit
Clinically diagnosed Type II Diabetes Mellitus
Time Frame: At 10-14 months from baseline visit
Clinical outcomes of Type II Diabetes Mellitus development determined by oral glucose tolerance test
At 10-14 months from baseline visit
Clinically diagnosed Type II Diabetes Mellitus
Time Frame: At 22-26 months from baseline visit
Clinical outcomes of Type II Diabetes Mellitus development determined by oral glucose tolerance test
At 22-26 months from baseline visit
Clinically diagnosed Type II Diabetes Mellitus
Time Frame: At 34-38 months from baseline visit
Clinical outcomes of Type II Diabetes Mellitus development determined by oral glucose tolerance test
At 34-38 months from baseline visit
Body mass index at the end of the 6 month intervention period
Time Frame: At 6 months (23-26 weeks) from baseline
Using weight and height measures
At 6 months (23-26 weeks) from baseline
Body fat mass at the end of the 6 month intervention period
Time Frame: At 6 months (23-26 weeks) from baseline
Measured using the bioelectrical impedance analysis scale
At 6 months (23-26 weeks) from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total energy intake from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Assess the effect of continous glucose monitoring sensor use on total energy intake calculated using data captured from the 24-Hour recall food diary.
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in total energy intake from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Assess the effect of continous glucose monitoring sensor use on total energy intake captured using data captured from the 24-Hour recall food diary.
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in diet quality from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Assess the effect of continous glucose monitoring sensor use on diet quality derived using a 24-Hour recall food diary.
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in diet quality from baseline, 6 months,12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Assess the effect of continous glucose monitoring sensor use on diet quality derived using a 24-Hour recall food diary.
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in physical activity from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Assess the effect of exercise tracker use on frequency and duration of physical activity using self-reported data from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in physical activity from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Assess the effect of exercise tracker use on frequency and duration of physical activity using self-reported data from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure measures from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Using diastolic and systolic blood pressure measures
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in diastolic and systolic blood pressure measures from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Using diastolic and systolic blood pressure measures
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in body mass index measures from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Calculating body mass index using height and weight measures
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in body mass index measures from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Calculating body mass index using height and weight measures
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in waist circumference measures from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Using waist circumference measures
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in waist circumference measures from from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Using waist circumference measures
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in body fat mass measures from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Using body fat mass measured using the bioelectrical impedance analysis scale
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in body fat mass measures from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Using body fat mass measured using the bioelectrical impedance analysis scale
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in HbA1c measures from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Using HbA1c levels measured from blood samples
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in HbA1c measures from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Using HbA1c levels measured from blood samples
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in fasting lipid profile from baseline at 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Using fasting lipid profiles (total cholesterol, Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides) of blood samples
Baseline and 6 months (23-26 weeks)
Change in fasting lipid profile from baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Using fasting lipid profiles (total cholesterol, Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides) of blood samples
Baseline, 6 months (23-26 weeks), 12 months (10-14 months), 24 months (22-26 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life from baseline at 12 months (10-14 months)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months (10-14 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Quality of life score measured using the EQ-5D-5L instrument
Baseline and 12 months (10-14 months) and 36 months (34-38 months)
Change in quality of life from baseline at 36 months (34-38 months)
Time Frame: Baseline and 36 months (34-38 months)
Quality of life score measured using the EQ-5D-5L instrument
Baseline and 36 months (34-38 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kok Hian Tan, MD, KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 26, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 26, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glucose Metabolism Disorders

Clinical Trials on Wearable Care Group

3
Subscribe