- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05081414
Efficacy of the PEAC-IC: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (PEAC-IC)
Efficacy of The Program for Teaching Self-Care in Heart Failure (PEAC-IC): a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
SP
-
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be regularly enrolled in the outpatient clinic;
- Having a confirmed diagnosis of HF, regardless of the etiology or having been hospitalized due to clinical mismatch of the syndrome
- Have clinical conditions that allow to participate in interviews, as assessed by the researcher;
- Have an active telephone contact;
- Be able to listen, speak, read and write portuguese, as assessed by the researcher;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery (up to 60 days after the operation or requiring surgical intervention after inclusion in the study) or any surgical intervention that may increase the demands of self-care.
- Patients proven to be diagnosed with COVID-19
- Patients in palliative care, according to the evaluation of the institution's health team, at any time of the research, that is, even after inclusion and randomization.
- Display adequate self-care and confidence in self-care (≥70 points) on the all EAC-IC subscales (SCHFI 6.2 brazilian version).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Beyond the active comparator, this group will receive the PEAC-IC, as described previously.
|
As described previously
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
The Control Group will receive the usual care in the health care institution, which consists of guidance during hospital discharge and delivery of a discharge planning form and outpatient follow-up with medical and nursing consultations and exams when indicated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-care behavior
Time Frame: Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v.6.2 will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation, T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
Self-care behavior will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v.6.2 (SCHFI), the Self-Care Scale for Patients with Heart Failure, adapted and validated for use in Brazil.
This scale consists of 22 items divided into three subscales.
The scores for each subscale can range from 0 to 100 points, and scores equal to or greater than 70, in any subscale, reflect adequate self-care.
|
Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v.6.2 will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation, T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
|
Change in Knowledge on Heart Failure
Time Frame: Disease Knowledge Questionnaire will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation, T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
The "Disease Knowledge Questionnaire will assess knowledge on Heart failure for Patients with Heart Failure", created and validated for use in Brazil.
It consists of 19 items: the HF pathophysiology contents, its concept, diagnosis, risk factors, symptoms, lifestyle habits, treatment, medications used, self-care, and physical exercise.
For each item, there are four alternatives: one is the correct answer; one is incomplete; one is incorrect and one is "I don't know".
According to the total score obtained, can be categorized as excellent (51 to 57 points); good (40 to 50 points); acceptable (29 to 39 points); little knowledge (17 to 28 points) and insufficient knowledge (< 17 points).
|
Disease Knowledge Questionnaire will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation, T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in quality of Life
Time Frame: Health-related Quality of Life will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation, T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
Quality of Life will be asses using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, the validated Portuguese version.
The instrument consists of 21 items that assess the participants' perception regarding how much the signs and symptoms of HF made it impossible/limited the daily activities or the activities that the participants would like to perform/perform.
These items refer to the physical, emotional and socioeconomic aspects that the presence of HF can impact and the answers range from zero to five points (0: nothing; 1: very little to 5: too much).
The final score is obtained through the sum of the answers of the 21 items and can range from zero to 105 points, the higher the score, the worse the quality of life and the lower the score, the better quality of life.
|
Health-related Quality of Life will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation, T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
|
Change in search for emergency medical care due to clinical decompensation of Heart Failure
Time Frame: Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
Number of times reported by the participant or family member/caregiver of fearch for emergency medical care due to clinical decompensation of Heart Failure
|
Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
|
Change in hospitalization due to clinical decompensation of Heart Failure
Time Frame: Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
Number of times reported by the participant or family member/caregiver of hospitalization due to clinical decompensation of Heart Failure
|
Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
|
Change in feeling of Powerlessness
Time Frame: Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
The feeling of powerlessness will be assessed by the Powerlessness assessment tool, created and validated in adults in the process of hospitalization.
It consists of 12 items divided into three domains: the ability to perform a behavior, perception of the ability to make decisions and emotional response to control situations.
The possibilities of answering the 12 items range from 'never to 'always' scored from 1 to 5. A cutoff score is not provided for interpreting the results.
However, the higher the score, the more intense the feeling of impotence.
The score obtained through this instrument will be treated as a continuous quantitative variable, for further categorization under the guidance of a statistician.
|
Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
|
Change in Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
The Depressive symptoms will be assessed by the Depression Scale CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) which aims to identify depressive mood and a possible vulnerability to depression.
This instrument was created by the NIMH - National Institute of Mental Health and consists of 20 items that measure the occurrence of depressive symptoms, such as mood, somatic symptoms, interactions with other people, and motor functioning, from the frequency of symptoms in the last week to interview.
The score for the 20 items can range from 0 to 3 and the response options range from rarely or never, a few times, sometimes, almost always, or always.
Thus, the total score varies between zero and sixty points.
The occurrence of depressive symptoms is considered from a score of ≥ 16 points
|
Will be assessed at the - T1: research participant allocation (number of times during the last 12 months), T2: seven weeks after allocation, 3 months after T2 and 6 months after T2.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michele Nakahara-Melo, MsC, University of Sao Paulo
- Study Chair: Diná Monteiro da Cruz, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
- Study Director: Ana Paula da Conceição, PhD, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Carvalho VO, Guimaraes GV, Carrara D, Bacal F, Bocchi EA. Validation of the Portuguese version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Jul;93(1):39-44. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009000700008. English, Portuguese, Spanish.
- da Conceicao AP, dos Santos MA, dos Santos B, da Cruz Dde A. Self-care in heart failure patients. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):578-86. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0288.2591.
- Ruppar TM, Cooper PS, Johnson ED, Riegel B. Self-care interventions for adults with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Mar;75(3):676-682. doi: 10.1111/jan.13903. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
- Sevilla-Cazes J, Ahmad FS, Bowles KH, Jaskowiak A, Gallagher T, Goldberg LR, Kangovi S, Alexander M, Riegel B, Barg FK, Kimmel SE. Heart Failure Home Management Challenges and Reasons for Readmission: a Qualitative Study to Understand the Patient's Perspective. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1700-1707. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4542-3. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
- Jaarsma T, Hill L, Bayes-Genis A, La Rocca HB, Castiello T, Celutkiene J, Marques-Sule E, Plymen CM, Piper SE, Riegel B, Rutten FH, Ben Gal T, Bauersachs J, Coats AJS, Chioncel O, Lopatin Y, Lund LH, Lainscak M, Moura B, Mullens W, Piepoli MF, Rosano G, Seferovic P, Stromberg A. Self-care of heart failure patients: practical management recommendations from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jan;23(1):157-174. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2008. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
- Jaarsma T, Stromberg A, Ben Gal T, Cameron J, Driscoll A, Duengen HD, Inkrot S, Huang TY, Huyen NN, Kato N, Koberich S, Lupon J, Moser DK, Pulignano G, Rabelo ER, Suwanno J, Thompson DR, Vellone E, Alvaro R, Yu D, Riegel B. Comparison of self-care behaviors of heart failure patients in 15 countries worldwide. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jul;92(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
- Riegel B, Dickson VV, Faulkner KM. The Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-Care: Revised and Updated. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):226-35. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000244.
- Vellone E, De Maria M, Iovino P, Barbaranelli C, Zeffiro V, Pucciarelli G, Durante A, Alvaro R, Riegel B. The Self-Care of Heart Failure Index version 7.2: Further psychometric testing. Res Nurs Health. 2020 Dec;43(6):640-650. doi: 10.1002/nur.22083. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-01
- PE 1118/2019 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CAPES)
- Process 2020/15834-8 (Other Grant/Funding Number: FAPESP)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
All variables will be collected and transcribed into the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) application, which will be used for data recording, secure storage, database manipulation. All variables collected will be documented as metadata, and the identity of the participants, such as name and initials, which allow any identification, will be removed from the spreadsheets that will be made available in the repositories. The researcher will keep, outside the application, a listing that will allow the participant to be identified, if necessary during the study. The sharing of metadata in the repositories will be subject to the consent of the participants, and such information will be included in the Consent Form.
The data will be stored in the cloud and a daily backup of the collected data is provided.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The metadata will be available upon request to the responsible researchers as soon as the research is completed for an indefinite time.
The researchers responsible for the study that generated the database will be able to, independently, use it for secondary analyses, as long as they ensure reference to the primary study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Clinical Trials on Program for Teaching Self-Care in HF (PEAC-IC)
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsWilliam Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityAstraZeneca; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; Atlantic Health Sciences... and other collaboratorsCompletedHeart FailureCanada
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic | Tobacco Use Disorder | Mental HealthUnited States
-
CEU San Pablo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of MichiganNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA); Vanderbilt... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDiabetesUnited States
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterJohnson & JohnsonCompletedDepressive Disorder, Major | Dysthymic Disorder | Depressive Disorder, MinorUnited States
-
Radboud University Medical CenterCompletedDementia | Dementia CaregiversNetherlands
-
Kaiser PermanenteCompleted
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted