- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05082649
Remote Exercise Programs in Chronic Low Back Pain
Investigation of Short and Long Term Results of Remote and Face-to-Face Exercise Education Programme for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
Low back pain is a common problem that affects many people at some point in their lives. These people constitute a big part of the disease burden due to their recurrent complaints. About 45% of individuals with chronic low back pain seek medical attention. This situation makes chronic low back pain the second reason for individuals to apply to the hospital.
Exercise therapy is the first option that comes to mind in the management of low back pain. It is seen that exercise therapy both reduces the intensity of pain and reduces the recurrence rate of complaints. When the literature is examined, it is observed that among the exercise models, stabilization exercises can provide more benefits than general exercises in reducing pain and improving disability. The COVID-19 pandemic causes disruptions in face-to-face rehabilitation services. The development of telemedicine and telerehabilitation services, whose popularity is increasing with the advancing technology, gained momentum with these disruptions. With telerehabilitation, long-term treatments tailored to the needs of the patients can be offered, the cost is low, and the patients can exercise at home, on their own, at their own pace, whenever they want. These reasons make telerehabilitation stand out especially during the pandemic period. The aim of the study planned in this context is to investigate short and long-term results of remote and face-to-face exercise training on function and disease symptoms for individuals with chronic low back pain.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Altındağ
-
Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey, 06100
- Hacettepe University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having low back pain for more than 3 months,
- Pain intensity of 3 or more according to VAS,
- literate,
- A smartphone user,
- Own a smartphone
- Individuals who are able to understand the exercises (total score >21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MOCA)) will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those who have been diagnosed with cervical or lumbar region pathologies,
- Cervical rapiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome,
- Having a malignant condition,
- Having systemic diseases such as neurological, psychological, cardiovascular, rheumatological and loss of function due to these diseases,
- History of previous surgery on the spine and upper extremity,
- Acute infection,
- Individuals who do not agree to participate in the study and do not give written consent will be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Telerehabilitation
Remotely (with video) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
|
Remotely (with video) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
|
|
Active Comparator: Face to Face Exercises
Face to face (in clinic) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
|
Face to face (in clinic) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Trunk Range of Motion
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline trunk range of motion at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Trunk range of motion measurement is a frequently used method in the evaluation of individuals with low back pain.
Trunk range of motion measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using Valedo® system (Hocoma, Switzerland).
Valedo® system is a professional system used in the evaluation and treatment of low back pain and valid and reliable system that is routinely used in the evaluation of trunk range of motion.
Within the scope of our study, trunk flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation movements will be evaluated.
All angles will be measured in degrees.
|
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline trunk range of motion at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Gait Parameters - Time Characteristics 1
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Gait analyses is used to evaluate the time-distance gait parameters in chronic conditions such as low back pain.
Gait analyses measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using OPTOGait (OPTOGait, Microgate, İtalya, 2010).
The OPTOGait system consists of two bars, each 1 meter, and one a sender and the other a receiver unit.
It is a portable platform that can be placed on the treadmill.
Its validity and reliability have been established.
During the assessment, individuals will walk in comfortable clothes and sneakers.
Individuals' walking at the pace they choose will be recorded for 1 minute.
Within the scope of our study, step time, gait cycle, and cadance will be evaluated and results will be recorded in seconds.
|
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Gait Parameters - Time Characteristics 2
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Gait analyses is used to evaluate the time-distance gait parameters in chronic conditions such as low back pain.
Gait analyses measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using OPTOGait (OPTOGait, Microgate, İtalya, 2010).
The OPTOGait system consists of two bars, each 1 meter, and one a sender and the other a receiver unit.
It is a portable platform that can be placed on the treadmill.
Its validity and reliability have been established.
During the assessment, individuals will walk in comfortable clothes and sneakers.
Individuals' walking at the pace they choose will be recorded for 1 minute.
Within the scope of our study, stance phase, swing phase, single support, double support, load response and pre-swing will be evaluated and results will be recorded as percentages.
|
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Gait Parameters - Distance Characteristics
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Gait analyses is used to evaluate the time-distance gait parameters in chronic conditions such as low back pain.
Gait analyses measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using OPTOGait (OPTOGait, Microgate, İtalya, 2010).
The OPTOGait system consists of two bars, each 1 meter, and one a sender and the other a receiver unit.
It is a portable platform that can be placed on the treadmill.
Its validity and reliability have been established.
During the assessment, individuals will walk in comfortable clothes and sneakers.
Individuals' walking at the pace they choose will be recorded for 1 minute.
Within the scope of our study, step length and stride length will be evaluated and results will be recorded in centimeter.
|
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Functional Capacity Level
Time Frame: 10 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline functional capacity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Functional capacity level will be evaluated with The Back Performance Scale.
This scale is a test that evaluates the effectiveness of each activity that includes 5 different activities (socks test, gathering test, righting test, fingertip-floor test, carrying test).
The Back Performance Scale test is scored between 0-15 points.
A high score means poor functional capacity.
|
10 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline functional capacity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain intensity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Pain intensity will be evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The VAS consists of a 10cm line.
The pain experienced by the patient is marked as "0: I have no pain", "10: I have a lot of pain".
Scoring is based on measuring the level marked by the participant on the line with a ruler.
|
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain intensity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of Quality of Life
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline quality of life at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Quality of life will be evaluated with Nottingham Health Profile.
This scale consists of 38 questions.
The scale with validity and reliability has 6 subgroups: physical activity, pain, sleep, social isolation, emotional reaction and energy level.
Each subgroup is scored within the range of 0-100, and a high score means poor quality of life.
|
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline quality of life at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Exercise Adaptation
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline exercise adaptation at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Exercise adaptation will be evaluated with the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS).
The scale consists of 3 parts.
The first 2 parts of the scale consist of 6 questions and the third part consists of 10 questions.
An increase in score indicates an increased adaptation to exercise.
A higher score indicates greater adaptation to exercise.
|
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline exercise adaptation at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Pain Catastrophization
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain catastrophizing scale score at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Pain catastrophization will be evaluated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.
Sullivan et al. was created to evaluate the catastrophic thoughts and feelings of individuals regarding the pain they feel.
Consisting of 13 questions, the scale consists of rumination (thoughts spinning in the mind), magnification of pain and helplessness sub-dimensions.
The total score is evaluated out of 52.
A high score means a high pain catastrophe.
|
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain catastrophizing scale score at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Disability
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline ODI score at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Disability will be evaluated with the Oswestry Disability İndex (ODI).
It was developed by Fairbank et al to evaluate the level of functional loss in individuals with low back pain.
The scale consists of 10 questions about pain intensity, self-care, lifting-carrying, walking, sitting, standing, sleep, degree of change in pain, travel and social life.
Each question is scored between 0-5 points.
The total score is evaluated out of 100.
A high score means a high level of disability.
|
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline ODI score at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
|
Evaluation of Media and Social Media Usage Situations with Technological Tools
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline score at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
The scale was created by Rosen et al. to evaluate the use of technological tools such as computers, smart phones, and media and social media.
The scale consists of two subscales and 15 factors.
The factors of the usage subscale are smartphone usage, general social network usage, searching the internet, using e-mail, sharing media, using text messages (SMS), playing video games, making phone calls, watching TV, online friendship and social media friendship.
The factors of the attitude subscale are positive attitude towards technology, anxiety of being without technology or technology addiction, negative attitude towards technology and transition preferences between tasks.
The validity and reliability study shows that the subscales of the scale can be used together or separately.
A high score means a high level of media and technology use.
|
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline score at 8 weeks and 6th months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KA-21024
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedLower Back Pain | Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, Postural | Postural Low Back Pain | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Low Back Ache | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior Compartment | Low BackacheUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityIstinye UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Recurrent | Low Back Pain, PosturalTurkey
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
General Incorporated Foundation Ryukyuseimeisaiseikai...CompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Non-specific Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain (LBP)Japan
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
Clinical Trials on Telerehabilitation
-
University of SalernoAzienda Ospedaliera OO.RR. S. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'AragonaRecruiting
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiCompletedQuality of Life | Fatigue | Muscle Weakness | Pulmonary Disease | COPD | Respiratory Disease | Dyspnea | Muscle Strength | Functional Capacity | Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Motor Imagery | Muscle; AccessoryTurkey
-
Biruni UniversityNot yet recruitingPremature Birth of Newborn | Motor Delay | Risky BabyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedHemiparetic Cerebral PalsyTurkey
-
Bright Cloud International CorpNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruitingCognitive Impairment, MildUnited States
-
University of Eastern FinlandOulu University Hospital; Kuopio University HospitalRecruiting
-
Sakarya Applied Sciences UniversityNot yet recruitingMusculoskeletal Diseases | Postural; Defect | DriveTurkey
-
King Saud UniversityRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisSaudi Arabia
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruitingCoronavirus Infections | Quality of Life | Covid19 | Respiratory Failure | ARDS | Dyspnea | Respiratory Rehabilitation | Sars-CoV-2 | Interstitial PneumoniaItaly
-
SOS Oxygene MediterraneeRecruitingExercise | Chronic Respiratory DiseaseFrance