Remote Exercise Programs in Chronic Low Back Pain

October 26, 2023 updated by: Aybüke Fanuscu, Hacettepe University

Investigation of Short and Long Term Results of Remote and Face-to-Face Exercise Education Programme for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Low back pain is a common problem that affects many people at some point in their lives. These people constitute a big part of the disease burden due to their recurrent complaints. About 45% of individuals with chronic low back pain seek medical attention. This situation makes chronic low back pain the second reason for individuals to apply to the hospital.

Exercise therapy is the first option that comes to mind in the management of low back pain. It is seen that exercise therapy both reduces the intensity of pain and reduces the recurrence rate of complaints. When the literature is examined, it is observed that among the exercise models, stabilization exercises can provide more benefits than general exercises in reducing pain and improving disability. The COVID-19 pandemic causes disruptions in face-to-face rehabilitation services. The development of telemedicine and telerehabilitation services, whose popularity is increasing with the advancing technology, gained momentum with these disruptions. With telerehabilitation, long-term treatments tailored to the needs of the patients can be offered, the cost is low, and the patients can exercise at home, on their own, at their own pace, whenever they want. These reasons make telerehabilitation stand out especially during the pandemic period. The aim of the study planned in this context is to investigate short and long-term results of remote and face-to-face exercise training on function and disease symptoms for individuals with chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Altındağ
      • Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey, 06100
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having low back pain for more than 3 months,
  • Pain intensity of 3 or more according to VAS,
  • literate,
  • A smartphone user,
  • Own a smartphone
  • Individuals who are able to understand the exercises (total score >21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MOCA)) will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have been diagnosed with cervical or lumbar region pathologies,
  • Cervical rapiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome,
  • Having a malignant condition,
  • Having systemic diseases such as neurological, psychological, cardiovascular, rheumatological and loss of function due to these diseases,
  • History of previous surgery on the spine and upper extremity,
  • Acute infection,
  • Individuals who do not agree to participate in the study and do not give written consent will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telerehabilitation
Remotely (with video) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
Remotely (with video) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
Active Comparator: Face to Face Exercises
Face to face (in clinic) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.
Face to face (in clinic) progressive spinal stabilization exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Trunk Range of Motion
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline trunk range of motion at 8 weeks and 6th months
Trunk range of motion measurement is a frequently used method in the evaluation of individuals with low back pain. Trunk range of motion measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using Valedo® system (Hocoma, Switzerland). Valedo® system is a professional system used in the evaluation and treatment of low back pain and valid and reliable system that is routinely used in the evaluation of trunk range of motion. Within the scope of our study, trunk flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation movements will be evaluated. All angles will be measured in degrees.
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline trunk range of motion at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Gait Parameters - Time Characteristics 1
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
Gait analyses is used to evaluate the time-distance gait parameters in chronic conditions such as low back pain. Gait analyses measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using OPTOGait (OPTOGait, Microgate, İtalya, 2010). The OPTOGait system consists of two bars, each 1 meter, and one a sender and the other a receiver unit. It is a portable platform that can be placed on the treadmill. Its validity and reliability have been established. During the assessment, individuals will walk in comfortable clothes and sneakers. Individuals' walking at the pace they choose will be recorded for 1 minute. Within the scope of our study, step time, gait cycle, and cadance will be evaluated and results will be recorded in seconds.
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Gait Parameters - Time Characteristics 2
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
Gait analyses is used to evaluate the time-distance gait parameters in chronic conditions such as low back pain. Gait analyses measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using OPTOGait (OPTOGait, Microgate, İtalya, 2010). The OPTOGait system consists of two bars, each 1 meter, and one a sender and the other a receiver unit. It is a portable platform that can be placed on the treadmill. Its validity and reliability have been established. During the assessment, individuals will walk in comfortable clothes and sneakers. Individuals' walking at the pace they choose will be recorded for 1 minute. Within the scope of our study, stance phase, swing phase, single support, double support, load response and pre-swing will be evaluated and results will be recorded as percentages.
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Gait Parameters - Distance Characteristics
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
Gait analyses is used to evaluate the time-distance gait parameters in chronic conditions such as low back pain. Gait analyses measurements will be carried out before and after the exercise program using OPTOGait (OPTOGait, Microgate, İtalya, 2010). The OPTOGait system consists of two bars, each 1 meter, and one a sender and the other a receiver unit. It is a portable platform that can be placed on the treadmill. Its validity and reliability have been established. During the assessment, individuals will walk in comfortable clothes and sneakers. Individuals' walking at the pace they choose will be recorded for 1 minute. Within the scope of our study, step length and stride length will be evaluated and results will be recorded in centimeter.
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Functional Capacity Level
Time Frame: 10 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline functional capacity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
Functional capacity level will be evaluated with The Back Performance Scale. This scale is a test that evaluates the effectiveness of each activity that includes 5 different activities (socks test, gathering test, righting test, fingertip-floor test, carrying test). The Back Performance Scale test is scored between 0-15 points. A high score means poor functional capacity.
10 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline functional capacity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain intensity level at 8 weeks and 6th months
Pain intensity will be evaluated with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10cm line. The pain experienced by the patient is marked as "0: I have no pain", "10: I have a lot of pain". Scoring is based on measuring the level marked by the participant on the line with a ruler.
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain intensity level at 8 weeks and 6th months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Quality of Life
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline quality of life at 8 weeks and 6th months
Quality of life will be evaluated with Nottingham Health Profile. This scale consists of 38 questions. The scale with validity and reliability has 6 subgroups: physical activity, pain, sleep, social isolation, emotional reaction and energy level. Each subgroup is scored within the range of 0-100, and a high score means poor quality of life.
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline quality of life at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Exercise Adaptation
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline exercise adaptation at 8 weeks and 6th months
Exercise adaptation will be evaluated with the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS). The scale consists of 3 parts. The first 2 parts of the scale consist of 6 questions and the third part consists of 10 questions. An increase in score indicates an increased adaptation to exercise. A higher score indicates greater adaptation to exercise.
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline exercise adaptation at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Pain Catastrophization
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain catastrophizing scale score at 8 weeks and 6th months
Pain catastrophization will be evaluated with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Sullivan et al. was created to evaluate the catastrophic thoughts and feelings of individuals regarding the pain they feel. Consisting of 13 questions, the scale consists of rumination (thoughts spinning in the mind), magnification of pain and helplessness sub-dimensions. The total score is evaluated out of 52. A high score means a high pain catastrophe.
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline pain catastrophizing scale score at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Disability
Time Frame: 5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline ODI score at 8 weeks and 6th months
Disability will be evaluated with the Oswestry Disability İndex (ODI). It was developed by Fairbank et al to evaluate the level of functional loss in individuals with low back pain. The scale consists of 10 questions about pain intensity, self-care, lifting-carrying, walking, sitting, standing, sleep, degree of change in pain, travel and social life. Each question is scored between 0-5 points. The total score is evaluated out of 100. A high score means a high level of disability.
5 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline ODI score at 8 weeks and 6th months
Evaluation of Media and Social Media Usage Situations with Technological Tools
Time Frame: 15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline score at 8 weeks and 6th months
The scale was created by Rosen et al. to evaluate the use of technological tools such as computers, smart phones, and media and social media. The scale consists of two subscales and 15 factors. The factors of the usage subscale are smartphone usage, general social network usage, searching the internet, using e-mail, sharing media, using text messages (SMS), playing video games, making phone calls, watching TV, online friendship and social media friendship. The factors of the attitude subscale are positive attitude towards technology, anxiety of being without technology or technology addiction, negative attitude towards technology and transition preferences between tasks. The validity and reliability study shows that the subscales of the scale can be used together or separately. A high score means a high level of media and technology use.
15 minutes, through study completion, an average of 8 weeks, and 6th months after treatment, change from baseline score at 8 weeks and 6th months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KA-21024

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Telerehabilitation

Subscribe