Are Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (SPIP) Blocks With Bupivacaine and With or Without Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) Helpful for Post-operative Pain After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

October 12, 2021 updated by: Sandeep Krishnan, Wayne State University

Are Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (SPIP) Blocks With Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block More Helpful Than SPIP Blocks Alone in Managing Post-operative Pain in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)?

The purpose of this study is to determine whether superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block alone or with transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block can improve post-operative pain in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, specifically, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain management remains an important clinical challenge in cardiothoracic surgery. Inadequate postoperative pain control can have adverse pathophysiologic consequences, including increased myocardial oxygen demand, hypoventilation, suboptimal clearance of pulmonary secretions, acute respiratory failure, and decreased mobility, with associated increased risks for formation of clots in a blood vessels (thromboembolism). These adverse events may result in greater perioperative morbidity and mortality. Despite several multimodal approaches to postoperative pain control, optimal pain management after cardiothoracic procedures remains an issue.

Regional anesthesia is used to block sensation in a specific part of body during and after surgery. It offers numerous advantages over conventional general anesthesia, including faster recovery time, fewer side effects, no need for an airway device during surgery, and a dramatic reduction in post-surgical pain and reduction in opioid use following surgery. The use of local anesthetic peripheral nerve blocks for surgical anesthesia and postoperative pain management has increased significantly with the advent of ultrasound-guided techniques.

Ultrasound has revolutionized regional anesthesia by allowing real-time visualization of anatomical structures, needle advancement and local anesthetic (LA) spread. This has led not only to refinement of existing techniques, but also the introduction of new ones.

In particular, ultrasound has been critical in the development of fascial plane blocks, in which local anesthetic (LA) is injected into a tissue plane rather than directly around nerves. These blocks are believed to work via passive spread of LA to nerves traveling within that tissue plane, or to adjacent tissue compartments containing nerves.

Although research into these techniques is still at an early stage, the available evidence indicates that they are effective in reducing opioid requirements and improving the pain experience in a wide range of clinical settings. They are best employed as part of multimodal analgesia with other systemic analgesics, rather than as sole anesthetic techniques. Catheters may be beneficial in situations where moderate-severe pain is expected for >12 hours, although the optimal dosing regimen requires further investigation.

In this study the investigators will focus on the superficial parasternal-intercostal plane (SPIP) block and the transverses abdomens plane (TAP) block.

The investigators will compare the SPIP block administered alone and with a TAP block; the investigators will measure the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery, total post-operative opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents), total acetaminophen and ketorolac consumption, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of the ICU stay, time to extubation, and length of hospital stay to determine if one technique is superior to the other.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with significant genetic or acquired clotting/bleeding disorders (hemophilia, DIC, etc.)
  • Patients with significant platelet dysfunction
  • Infection at site for regional anesthesia
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Severe mitral stenosis
  • Sepsis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SPIP Block
50 Patients-Post-operatively patients will receive bilateral SPIP blocks by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (on each side) between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscle aponeurosis at 2 cm lateral to the right and left of the sternal edge, corresponding to the fifth rib.
Injection of Bupivacaine 0.25% for SPIP Block
Active Comparator: SPIP Block with TAP Block
50 Patients-Post-operatively patients will receive bilateral SPIP blocks by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (on each side) between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscle aponeurosis at 2 cm lateral to the right and left of the sternal edge, corresponding to the fifth rib. This group of patients will also receive unilateral TAP block by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles.
Injection of Bupivacaine 0.25% for SPIP Block and TAP Block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative total opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Total Opioid consumption 24 hours post surgery oral moral morphine equivalents
24 hours after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
Pain Scores measured via a Visual Analog Scale (0-10, Higher scores mean worse outcome)
6 hours after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Pain Scores measured via a Visual Analog Scale (0-10, Higher scores mean worse outcome)
12 hours after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Pain Scores measured via a Visual Analog Scale (0-10, Higher scores mean worse outcome)
24 hours after surgery
Length of hospital stay (LOS)
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
The days spent in the hospital from surgery to discharge
Up to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of post-operation nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Time Frame: 24 hours
The percentage of the patients who had post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 24 hours of surgery
24 hours
Acetaminophen consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Total acetaminophen consumption in mg 24 hr after surgery
24 hours after surgery
NSAID (ketorolac) consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Total NSAID consumption in mg
24 hours after surgery
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Length of stay in Intensive Care Unit from surgery to discharge from Intensive Care Unit
Up to 1 month
Time to extubation
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time it took for patient to be extubated
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-operative Pain Management

Clinical Trials on SPIP Block

Subscribe