- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05090735
Are Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (SPIP) Blocks With Bupivacaine and With or Without Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) Helpful for Post-operative Pain After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?
Are Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane (SPIP) Blocks With Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block More Helpful Than SPIP Blocks Alone in Managing Post-operative Pain in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Postoperative pain management remains an important clinical challenge in cardiothoracic surgery. Inadequate postoperative pain control can have adverse pathophysiologic consequences, including increased myocardial oxygen demand, hypoventilation, suboptimal clearance of pulmonary secretions, acute respiratory failure, and decreased mobility, with associated increased risks for formation of clots in a blood vessels (thromboembolism). These adverse events may result in greater perioperative morbidity and mortality. Despite several multimodal approaches to postoperative pain control, optimal pain management after cardiothoracic procedures remains an issue.
Regional anesthesia is used to block sensation in a specific part of body during and after surgery. It offers numerous advantages over conventional general anesthesia, including faster recovery time, fewer side effects, no need for an airway device during surgery, and a dramatic reduction in post-surgical pain and reduction in opioid use following surgery. The use of local anesthetic peripheral nerve blocks for surgical anesthesia and postoperative pain management has increased significantly with the advent of ultrasound-guided techniques.
Ultrasound has revolutionized regional anesthesia by allowing real-time visualization of anatomical structures, needle advancement and local anesthetic (LA) spread. This has led not only to refinement of existing techniques, but also the introduction of new ones.
In particular, ultrasound has been critical in the development of fascial plane blocks, in which local anesthetic (LA) is injected into a tissue plane rather than directly around nerves. These blocks are believed to work via passive spread of LA to nerves traveling within that tissue plane, or to adjacent tissue compartments containing nerves.
Although research into these techniques is still at an early stage, the available evidence indicates that they are effective in reducing opioid requirements and improving the pain experience in a wide range of clinical settings. They are best employed as part of multimodal analgesia with other systemic analgesics, rather than as sole anesthetic techniques. Catheters may be beneficial in situations where moderate-severe pain is expected for >12 hours, although the optimal dosing regimen requires further investigation.
In this study the investigators will focus on the superficial parasternal-intercostal plane (SPIP) block and the transverses abdomens plane (TAP) block.
The investigators will compare the SPIP block administered alone and with a TAP block; the investigators will measure the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in the first 24 hours after surgery, total post-operative opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents), total acetaminophen and ketorolac consumption, post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of the ICU stay, time to extubation, and length of hospital stay to determine if one technique is superior to the other.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sandeep Krishnan, M.D.
- Phone Number: (248) 858-6068
- Email: sakrishna@med.wayne.edu
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with significant genetic or acquired clotting/bleeding disorders (hemophilia, DIC, etc.)
- Patients with significant platelet dysfunction
- Infection at site for regional anesthesia
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Severe aortic stenosis
- Severe mitral stenosis
- Sepsis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: SPIP Block
50 Patients-Post-operatively patients will receive bilateral SPIP blocks by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (on each side) between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscle aponeurosis at 2 cm lateral to the right and left of the sternal edge, corresponding to the fifth rib.
|
Injection of Bupivacaine 0.25% for SPIP Block
|
|
Active Comparator: SPIP Block with TAP Block
50 Patients-Post-operatively patients will receive bilateral SPIP blocks by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (on each side) between the pectoralis major and external intercostal muscle aponeurosis at 2 cm lateral to the right and left of the sternal edge, corresponding to the fifth rib.
This group of patients will also receive unilateral TAP block by injecting 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles.
|
Injection of Bupivacaine 0.25% for SPIP Block and TAP Block.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative total opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Total Opioid consumption 24 hours post surgery oral moral morphine equivalents
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
|
Pain Scores measured via a Visual Analog Scale (0-10, Higher scores mean worse outcome)
|
6 hours after surgery
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
|
Pain Scores measured via a Visual Analog Scale (0-10, Higher scores mean worse outcome)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Pain Scores measured via a Visual Analog Scale (0-10, Higher scores mean worse outcome)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Length of hospital stay (LOS)
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
|
The days spent in the hospital from surgery to discharge
|
Up to 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of post-operation nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The percentage of the patients who had post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 24 hours of surgery
|
24 hours
|
|
Acetaminophen consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Total acetaminophen consumption in mg 24 hr after surgery
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
NSAID (ketorolac) consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Total NSAID consumption in mg
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Length of ICU stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
|
Length of stay in Intensive Care Unit from surgery to discharge from Intensive Care Unit
|
Up to 1 month
|
|
Time to extubation
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Time it took for patient to be extubated
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SPIP and TAP in CABG
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Post-operative Pain Management
-
Unity Health TorontoAFP Innovation FundRecruitingSpinal Surgery | Post-operative Pain Management | Post-operative CareCanada
-
University of JordanRecruitingPost Operative Pain ManagementJordan
-
Wayne State UniversityRecruitingPost-operative Pain ManagementUnited States
-
Alexander M Spiess, MDCompletedPost Operative Pain ManagementUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownPost Operative Pain ManagementEgypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedPost Operative Pain ManagementEgypt
-
Matthew KrohCompletedPost-operative Pain ManagementUnited States
-
Minia UniversityActive, not recruitingPost-operative Pain ManagementEgypt
-
University Health Network, TorontoUnknownPost-operative Pain ManagementCanada
Clinical Trials on SPIP Block
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedPostoperative Delirium | Postoperative Pain Management | SternotomyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic,...RecruitingPain, Postoperative | Analgesia | Chest Pain | Anesthesia, Local | Pain, Procedural | Regional Anesthesia Morbidity | ICDPoland
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingPain, Acute | Nerve Block | Thoracic AnesthesiaChina
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Uludag UniversityRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Patient Outcome Assessment | Sternotomy | Nerve BlockTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Erzincan UniversityRecruitingTotal Knee Arthroplasty | Post Operative AnalgesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptCompleted
-
University of FloridaUnited States Department of Defense; Brooks RehabilitationCompleted
-
Cumhuriyet UniversityCompleted
-
Kyungpook National University HospitalCompletedPain | Radicular; Neuropathic, Cervical