Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block

October 13, 2021 updated by: Daghmouri Mohamed Aziz, Tunis University

Trocar-site Infiltration With Ropivacaine Versus Tranversus Abdominis Plane Block Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Double-blinded, Randomized-controlled Trial

For symptomatic gall bladder disorders (cholelithiasis and cholecystitis), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered as the gold standard treatment. However, these minimally invasive technique is associated with acute moderate pain during the 24 hours postoperative, which is routinely managed using opioids. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy. Besides, Wang et al found that TAP block is more effective than a conventional pain control, but not significatively different from another local incisional pain control that is port site infiltration.So, the aim of this study, is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of trocar-site infiltration with ropivacaine with ultrasound-guided TAP block following laparoscopic cholecystectomy when used as part of multimodal analgesia.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI < 30 kg/m2
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • ASA grade I, II and III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bile duct exploration, insertion of a T-drain or patients with acute cholecystitis
  • Conversion to open cholecystectomy or if the surgery exceeded 200 minutes
  • Severe systemic disease
  • Patients on analgesics for any reason
  • History of allergy to local anesthetics
  • An ongoing pregnancy
  • Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Trocar-site infiltration
Trocar-site infiltration with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (6 mL in 10 mm trocar site and 4 mL in 5 mm trocar site) associated with bilateral TAP block with 20 mL of normal saline in each side
20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% (6 mL in 10 mm trocar site and 4 mL in 6 mm trocar site)
bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of normal saline in each side
Active Comparator: TAP block
Trocar-site infiltration with 20 mL of normal saline associated with bilateral TAP block with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% in each side
bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% in each side
20 mL of normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute postoperative pain
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Visual analog scale (VAS) 0: "no pain" to 10: "severe pain" at rest and cough
up to 24 hours
Total opioid consumption
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 1 week
up to 1 week
postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery
Time Frame: Day 1
QoR-40 questionnaire
Day 1
Incidence of shoulder pain
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Postoperative complication
Time Frame: up to 1 week
Ileus, wound infection, wound abscess
up to 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: BEN FADHEL Kamel, M.D, Habib Thameur Hospital of Tunis, Department of Anesthesia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Clinical Trials on Trocar-site infiltration

Subscribe