A Comparison of Static and Dynamic PET/CT (HYPOTHESIS Generation Study)

January 28, 2025 updated by: André H. Dias, Aarhus University Hospital

A Comparison of Static and Dynamic PET/CT in Patients With Malignancies, Infections and Inflammatory Diseases (HYPOTHESIS Generation Study)

The general purpose of this initial study is to evaluate whether parametric PET/CT improves diagnosis and treatment monitoring in select diseases. The specific aim of the HYPOTHESIS GENERATION study is:

1. To obtain and compare parametric as well as traditional static PET/CT images and determine the number of lesions identified on each type of scan.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The hypothesis generating study will include a wide range of patients scheduled for PET/CT as part of either pre-therapy staging or treatment response.

Most scans will be performed with FDG, with indications for PET/CT including hematological, urogenital, thoracic and gynecological malignancies as well as patients with suspected infections and inflammation. We will also include patients referred for PET/CT using other radiotracers, such as tumour markers (68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-FDOPA, 68Ga-PSMA, 18F-PSMA).

Instead of the usual procedure of having the injection of the radiotracer in the waiting room and having to wait 60 minutes before being moved to the scanner room for imaging, the study participants will be injected with the radiotracer already laying on the scanner bed and the scan will commence immediately.

Therefore, in this study the patients are still only being scanned once, but we are gathering PET information in a different way.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a planned clinical standard PET/CT as part of pre-therapeutic staging, response assessment scanning or evaluation of infection/inflammation.
  • Good performance status, which permits patients to lay still in the scanner for ca. 70 min.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 or > 85 years
  • Patients that can not tolerate a PET scan (f.ex: claustrophobia).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Main arm
Patients will perform a D-WB PET/CT scan as a substitute for their clinical PET.

Instead of the usual procedure of having the injection of the radiotracer in the waiting room and having to wait 60 minutes before being moved to the scanner room for imaging, the study participants will be injected with the radiotracer already laying on the scanner bed and the scan will commence immediately.

Therefore, in this study the patients are still only being scanned once, but we are gathering PET information in a different way.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Obtaining a database of parametric and traditional static PET/CT images for comparison of visual and semiquantitative evaluation
Time Frame: through study completion, average 1 year
We will perform a correlation of the image derived from parametric PET/CT with those obtained from static PET/CT. This will allow us to evaluate if there are clinical advantages in regards to using parametric PET in clinical routine.
through study completion, average 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HYPOTHESIS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

According to local rules and GDRP it is not possible for study data to leave the facility.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on D-WB PET/CT

Subscribe