Sarcopenia and Its Associated Factors Among Hip Fractures Patients

November 30, 2021 updated by: AHAbdelhafeez, Assiut University

Sarcopenia and Its Associated Factors Among Hip Fracture Patients in Assuit University Trauma Hospital

  1. Asses the prevalence of sarcopenia in hip fracture patients in Truama hospital at Assuit University
  2. To study the associated factors of sarcopenia in hip fracture patients in Trauma hospital at Assuit University

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Skeletal muscle is the largest body compartment in most adults with the exception of an enlarged adipose tissue mass in the presence of obesity. Skeletal muscles grow in size from birth onward, reaching peak mass in the third decade. Many factors determine an individual adult's total body skeletal muscle mass and include their size(height),magnitude of adiposity, race, genetic factors, activity, hormone levels and diet. By the fourth decade populations and individuals begin to show a gradual loss in skeletal muscle mass and the rate of atrophy appears to accelerate beyond the seventh decade. The senescence-related changes in skeletal muscle are, in turn, associated with adverse out- comes such as pathological bone fractures and even death. The term sarcopenia, from the Greek roots is widely used to describe the age-associated decrease in muscle mass observed in several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Interest in sarcopenia mainly results from its linkage with unfavorable outcomes, including mobility disorders, increased risk of falling, reduced ability to function in activities of daily living, loss of independence, poor quality of life, and reduced life expectancy. Measuring skeletal muscle mass, composition, strength and physical performance is thus a vital part of not only studying sarcopenia, but also of growing importance in clinically evaluating and monitoring the greatly increasing population of ageing at risk adults in most countries. Our report highlights aspects of evaluating these features of skeletal muscle and expands on earlier methodological and historical reviews. While the main phenotypic feature of sarcopenia is loss of lean tissue, notably skeletal muscle, there is growing recognition that sarcopenia can co-exist in the presence of obesity. A skeletal muscle compartment reduced in mass may thus be masked by the presence of excess fat. Diagnosing sarcopenia-obesity may thus include measures beyond that of skeletal muscle mass such as BMI and total body fat, topics that we will allude to in the review that follows. Loss of skeletal muscle also plays an important role in two other conditions, cachexia and frailty, creating a spectrum of phenotypes and clinical conditions that encompass sarcopenia There are two main factors for Skeletal muscle evaluation, skeletal muscle mass and composition, are the main determinants of global muscle metabolic function, strength and physical performance. Vascular and neurological integrity are also essential components that ultimately contribute to a skeletal muscle's metabolic and mechanical functionality. The'quality' of a skeletal muscle is a loosely defined concept that broadly includes aspects of anatomic structure, chemical composition and metabolic and mechanical performance. Our review encompasses aspects of measuring skeletal muscle mass, composition and function in relation to the evaluation of individuals and groups for the presence of sarcopenia and related conditions. Multiple methods of measuring skeletal muscle mass are available for research and clinical purposes that vary in cost, complexity and availability. A high prevalence of low muscle mass in hip-fracture patients has been shown. Hip fractures carry a high risk of both death and disability with a 8-36 % excess mortality within 1 year and more than 50 % of the survivors not regaining their own pre-injury level of independence. Sarcopenia may worsen the functional prognosis after hip fracture occurrence, but the association between reduced muscle mass and functional ability remains unclear in this group of older and frail persons. Conversely, muscle strength has been indicated as a strong independent predictor of the functional outcome, whereas lower-limb performance is usually not accessible at an early stage, because of the direct consequences of the hip fracture on ambulation. There are no available studies in our locality about sarcopenia and its related factors

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

152

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

admitted patients in Assiut university Truama hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • old patients >50 years with hip fracture attending assuit university hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with dementia ,muscle disease and neurological disease
  2. Patients who are unwilling to participate
  3. Patients>80 years due to uncooperate at this age to answer the questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of Sarcopenia among Hip fracture patients in Assuit University Truama hospital
Time Frame: 20 minutes
by dexa scan
20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Osama Ahmad, prof, assuit yniversity

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on dexa scan

3
Subscribe