Evaluation of Endoscopic Surgical Field Clarity Using Hot Saline Versus Lactated Ringer's Irrigation

August 2, 2024 updated by: Carl Snyderman
This study is designed to determine whether Normal Saline or Lactated Ringer's irrigation is superior in maintaining superior endoscopic surgical field clarity in surgery for pituitary adenoma.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aims of this study are to determine whether the endoscopic surgical view is objectively clearer using Normal Saline versus Lactated Ringer's Irrigation during endoscopic skull base surgery for pituitary adenoma. Other objectives include determining whether lactated Ringer's irrigation decreases total estimated blood loss and whether use of lactated Ringer's irrigation shortens surgical time.

Hot saline irrigation at 40 degrees Celcius has been shown to improve endoscopic surgical field clarity and its use is common practice in both endoscopic inflammatory sinus surgeries and skull base procedures. Saline irrigation dilutes blood in the surgical field keeping the endoscopic view clean and more bloodless and the elevated temperature promotes hemostasis.

Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of calcium-containing irrigant may further improve endoscopic surgical views. This mechanism is thought to be mediated through the activation of platelets and providing a calcium source to calcium-dependent factors in the coagulation cascade thereby promoting hemostasis. Using lactated Ringer's, a calcium-containing fluid, may result in improved surgeon visualization, decreased blood loss, and decreased complications during endoscopic approaches to the skull base.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient with a primary pituitary adenoma, macro or micro adenoma.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18
  • Pregnancy
  • Revision surgery
  • Non-surgical candidate due to medical, surgical, or anesthesia contraindications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Normal Saline
This study will be a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial. Fifteen patients will be randomly assigned to the normal saline group using a random number generator.
Normal Saline at 40C will be used for the entirety of the surgery including the approach and exposure of the tumor as well as tumor resection, After surgery, two blinded skull base surgeon reviewers will rate the clarity of the endoscopic field of view at the recorded intervals. The surgical field will be graded using a widely accepted numeric integer (Boezaart) scale.
Experimental: Lactated Ringer's Irrigation
This study will be a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial. Fifteen patients will be randomly assigned to the lactated reinger group using a random number generator.
Lactated Ringers at 40C will be used for the entirety of the surgery including the approach and exposure of the tumor as well as tumor resection, After surgery, two blinded skull base surgeon reviewers will rate the clarity of the endoscopic field of view at the recorded intervals. The surgical field will be graded using a widely accepted numeric integer (Boezaart) scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boezaart scale rating video clips
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Rating for each of the three recorded video clips per patient following tumor ablation. The Boezaart is an ordinal scale 0 = No bleeding 1 = Minimal bleeding: Not a surgical nuisance and no suction required 2 = Mild bleeding: Occasional suction required, but does not affect dissection 3 = Moderate bleeding: Slightly compromises surgical field, frequent suction required 4 = Severe bleeding: Significantly compromises surgical field, frequent suction required, bleeding threat field just after removal of suction 5 = Massive bleeding: Prevent dissection.
10 minutes
Boezaart scale rating video clips
Time Frame: 10 minutes
rating for each of the three recorded video clips per patient after 10 minutes of irrigation. The Boezaart is an ordinal scale 0 = No bleeding 1 = Minimal bleeding: Not a surgical nuisance and no suction required 2 = Mild bleeding: Occasional suction required, but does not affect dissection 3 = Moderate bleeding: Slightly compromises surgical field, frequent suction required 4 = Severe bleeding: Significantly compromises surgical field, frequent suction required, bleeding threat field just after removal of suction 5 = Massive bleeding: Prevent dissection.
10 minutes
Boezaart scale rating video clips
Time Frame: 10 minutes
rating for each of the three recorded video clips per patient at the completion of hemostasis. The Boezaart is an ordinal scale 0 = No bleeding 1 = Minimal bleeding: Not a surgical nuisance and no suction required 2 = Mild bleeding: Occasional suction required, but does not affect dissection 3 = Moderate bleeding: Slightly compromises surgical field, frequent suction required 4 = Severe bleeding: Significantly compromises surgical field, frequent suction required, bleeding threat field just after removal of suction 5 = Massive bleeding: Prevent dissection..
10 minutes
Time
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Time between tumor ablation and the completion of hemostasis, or total irrigation time for patients undergoing normal saline or Lactated Ringer's irrigation during their surgical case.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimated Blood Loss (EBL)
Time Frame: 15 min
(EBL) per case and total operative time
15 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carl Snyderman, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY21110081

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irrigation

Clinical Trials on Normal Saline

Subscribe