Comparison of Obturation Quality and Lateral Canal Fill (by Sealer): Ultrasonic-Activated Versus Non-Ultrasonic Conventional Irrigation Techniques in Root Canal Treatment - A Randomized Controlled Trial

December 10, 2025 updated by: Syed Shahbaz Ali Shah, Prime Foundation

The main goal of clinical trail to compare obturation quality and lateral canal sealer fill between ultrasonic activated and conventional irrigation in root canal treatment.

HYPOTHESIS There is a difference in obturation quality and lateral canal fill between ultrasonic activated irrigation results as compared to conventional irrigation technique in root canal treatment.

Eligible patients will be recruited from the Endodontics Department at Peshawar Dental College who present with pain and sensitivity in mandibular teeth and are advised root canal treatment after clinical examination and X-ray. Patients will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and informed written consent will be taken. This will be a double-blinded study, and demographic and tooth-related information will be recorded.

Participants will be randomized into two groups using block randomization with a block size of six. The Non-Ultrasonic group will receive conventional irrigation using syringe, 3% sodium hypochlorite, and Tg sealer, while the Ultrasonic group will be irrigated using the VAT-3 ultrasonic activator with the same solution and sealer. Pre- and post-operative radiographs will be taken to evaluate obturation quality and lateral canal fill in terms of length, density, and taper using a standardized proforma.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Khyber Pakhtoon Khawa(KPK)a
      • Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtoon Khawa(KPK)a, Pakistan, 25000
        • Peshawar Dental Collge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both male and female
  • Age group adults 18 to 70 years
  • Patients presenting with pain and sensitivity in mandibular molars and advised root canal treatment after examination and x ray

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with complex root canal anatomy that may complicate the obturation process
  • Pregnancy
  • Medically compromised patients including uncontrolled diabetes -cardiovascular disease immunodeficiency disorders bleeding disorders and -severe respiratory disease
  • Patients who refused to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ULTRASONIC IRRIGITATION TECHNIQUE
The utilization of theVAT-3 ultrasonic activator high frequency device (45KHz± 5kHz) [Refine] for the Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation group and same solution of 3% sodium hypochlorite and Tg Sealer will be used. Post-operative radiographs will be obtained to assess the obturation quality and lateral canal fill. A detailed radiographic proforma will be employed to evaluate the length, density, taper of the root canal filling, and lateral canal fill . Each of these components will be scored individually, and an overall Obturation Quality Score is calculated by summing these scores.
Other: NON-ULTRASONIC CONVENTIONAL IRRIGATION TECHNIQUE
The root canal treatment is then performed as per the assigned group, with conventional irrigation involving the use of syringes and 3% sodium hypochlorite solution and Tg Sealer for the Non-Ultrasonic Conventional Irrigation group.A detailed radiographic proforma will be employed to evaluate the length, density, taper of the root canal filling, and lateral canal fill . Each of these components will be scored individually, and an overall Obturation Quality Score is calculated by summing these scores.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare obturation quality and lateral canal sealer fill between ultrasonic activated and conventional irrigation in root canal treatment
Time Frame: Immediate, after completion of procedure

Obturation Quality and Lateral Canal Fill:- This will involve evaluating the length of the root canal filling in the main canals, assessing the homogeneity (density) of the obturation material, determining the taper of the root canal filling, and examining the sealer's penetration into lateral canals using postoperative radiographs. The radiographs will be reviewed independently by two senior endodontists. A scoring system will be applied, and each of the three parameters will be individually assessed.

Lateral Canal:- A type of accessory canal located in the coronal or middle third of the root, usually extending horizontally from the main canal space.

Immediate, after completion of procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Prime Foundation

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after completion of results.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers studying similar primary outcomes

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Comparison Between Two Type of Irrigation Systems

Clinical Trials on ULTRASONIC IRRIGATION TECHNIQUE

Subscribe