Splint Versus Steroid Randomized Trial

March 7, 2022 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

Splint Versus Steroid Injection for DeQuervain's Tenosynovitis: A Randomized Trial

The primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of splinting versus steroid injection in improving the DASH scores in participants diagnosed with De Quervain's tenosynovitis over a period of 6 months.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The primary hypothesis is that steroid injection into the first dorsal compartment is more effective compared with splinting at 3 months.

The secondary hypothesis is that steroid injection yields better clinical outcomes compared with splinting at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of de Quervain's tenosynovitis based on the de Quervain's screening tool (DQST) with scores ≥ 5 (refer to table 1)
  • No prior treatment
  • Above 21 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to steroid (triamcinolone acetate) or local anaesthetic (lignocaine)
  • History of work related trauma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Randomized: Steroid injection
1ml injection of a mixture of 0.5ml triamcinolone acetonide (50mg/5ml) and 0.5ml 1% lignoacaine is given intra-thecally into the first extensor compartment.

Intervention will be done on the same day based on the randomization.

For the steroid injection group, a 1ml injection of a mixture of 0.5ml triamcinolone acetonide (50mg/5ml) and 0.5ml 1% lignoacaine is given intra-thecally into the first extensor compartment.

For both groups, routine analgesia is not prescribed but the use is not restricted to the participants.

Other: Randomized: Splint
a long thumb spica thermoplastic splint (wrist neutral, 30º CMCJ flexion, 30º thumb abduction, IPJ free) will be customized and intermittent active range of motion exercises will be taught for 4 weeks

Intervention will be done on the same day based on the randomization. For the splint group, a long thumb spica thermoplastic splint (wrist neutral, 30º CMCJ flexion, 30º thumb abduction, IPJ free) will be customized and intermittent active range of motion exercises will be taught for 4 weeks. Subsequently, the splint will be weaned and passive range of motion exercises taught.

For both groups, routine analgesia is not prescribed but the use is not restricted to the participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (QuickDASH)
Time Frame: 6 months
Our co- primary outcome would be QuickDash. QuickDash is a disability score we use for the upper limb where the higher score indicates greater disability and severity. We would expect a decrease in QuickDash scores following a success in the treatment measure. The resultant score is reported on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents no disability and 100 represents total disability
6 months
Patients who have recovered from De Quervain's Tenosynovitis
Time Frame: 6 months
The other primary outcomes would be the number of patients who have completely recovered from De Quervain's tenosynovitis. This will be determined by the global improvement the patient feels that will be ranked on a 7 point Likert scale (1: very much worse, 2: much worse, 3:slightly worse, 4:no change, 5:slightly better, 6:much better, 7:completely resolved).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Renita Sirisena, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on De Quervain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Hydrocortisone-Lidocaine

Subscribe