Management of Pes Planovalgus With Talocalcaneal Coalition ,Osteotomy vs Arthroereisis

June 1, 2022 updated by: Ain Shams University

Coalition Excision and Corrective Osteotomies vs Coalition Excision and Arthroereisis in Management of Pes Planovalgus With Talocalcaneal Coalition in Adolescent

the investigators compare the corrective osteotomies vs arthroereisis in management of talcalcaneal coalition in adolescents as regard the outcome to provide the best intervention for the patient

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In talocalcaneal coalition management is controversial so in this study the invstigators try to compare techniques other than coalition excision only or fusion only by using two types of intervention including first coalition excision and multiple corrective osteotomies according to deformity as evans ,medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and cotton osteotomy vs coalition excision and arthroereisis the investigators compare functional and radiological outcomes and complication to provide the best management for these patients .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 20 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • flat foot due to talocalcaneal coalition Symptomatic patient Resectable coalition Age between 10 and 20

Exclusion Criteria:

  • flat foot of other etiology Age more than 20 Concurrent knee deformity unless corrected before surgery Extensive coalition more than 50 %of posterior facet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: coalition excision and arthroereisis
Talocalcaneal bar excision is done and then arthroereisis implant is applied in subtalar joint to correct rigid pes planovalgus in adolescent
Both done to treat rigid flat foot with talocalcaneal coalition. Talocalcaneal coalition excision and management of rigid pes planovalgus in adolescent
Other Names:
  • Coalition excision and corrective osteotomies
Experimental: coalition excision and corrective osteotomies
Talocalcaneal bar excision is done and then according to degree of deformity either medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy or evans or cotton osteotomy is done or combined together to correct rigid pes planovalgus in adolescents
Both done to treat rigid flat foot with talocalcaneal coalition. Talocalcaneal coalition excision and management of rigid pes planovalgus in adolescent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of deformity valgus
Time Frame: preoperative
By goniometer
preoperative
Degree of deformity valgus
Time Frame: three months
By goniometer
three months
Degree of deformity valgus
Time Frame: six months
By goniometer
six months
Degree of deformity valgus
Time Frame: one year postoperative
By goniometer
one year postoperative
Degree of deformity valgus
Time Frame: two year postoperative
By goniometer
two year postoperative
Subtalar range of motion
Time Frame: preoperative
By geniometer for inversion and eversion
preoperative
Subtalar range of motion
Time Frame: three months
By geniometer for inversion and eversion
three months
Subtalar range of motion
Time Frame: six months
By geniometer for inversion and eversion
six months
Subtalar range of motion
Time Frame: one year postoperative
By geniometer for inversion and eversion
one year postoperative
Subtalar range of motion
Time Frame: two year postoperative
By geniometer for inversion and eversion
two year postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional outcome
Time Frame: preoperative
By foot ankle ability measurement score
preoperative
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: preoperative
By foot and ankle disability score
preoperative
functional outcome
Time Frame: three months
By foot ankle ability measurement score
three months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: three months
By foot and ankle disability score
three months
functional outcome
Time Frame: six months
By foot ankle ability measurement score
six months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: six months
By foot and ankle disability score
six months
functional outcome
Time Frame: one year
By foot ankle ability measurement score
one year
functional outcome
Time Frame: two year
By foot ankle ability measurement score
two year
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: one year
By foot and ankle disability score
one year
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: two year
By foot and ankle disability score
two year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AOFAS
Time Frame: preoperative
he American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score up to 100 the higher the score the better function
preoperative
AOFAS
Time Frame: three months
he American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score up to 100 the higher the score the better function
three months
AOFAS
Time Frame: six months
he American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score up to 100 the higher the score the better function
six months
AOFAS
Time Frame: one year
he American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score up to 100 the higher the score the better function
one year
AOFAS
Time Frame: two year
he American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score up to 100 the higher the score the better function
two year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: ayman m howeidy, professor, Ain Shams University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pes Planus

Clinical Trials on Coaltion excision and arthroereisis

Subscribe