Pelvic Floor Muscles and Stabilization Integrated Training Improved Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain

September 15, 2022 updated by: YI-JU TSAI

Pelvic Floor Muscles and Stabilization Integrated Training With Transabdominal Ultrasonography-guided Biofeedback Improved Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain and Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common musculoskeletal problem for women during pregnancy and after delivery. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of integrated training for pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and stabilization with and without transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS) imaging-guided biofeedback on pain, disability, and physical function, and muscle functions for the abdominal muscles and PFMs in postpartum women with PPGP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many women have pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP), and about 30% with PPGP women still complain of pain after 1-year postpartum. Both physical and mental functions of PPGP women are impaired. Pelvic stabilization exercise with pelvic floor muscle training is believed to be effective for reducing pain and improved pelvic stability. However, intervention studies on PPGP women is limited and current evidence are controversial. Incorrect pelvic floor muscle activations may be partly contributed to these results. One previous study has showed about 60% of women cannot activate pelvic floor muscles correctly. Transabdominal sonography-guided biofeedback by observing bladder movements is no-invasive and benefit learning correct muscle contraction. Therefore, the main purposes for this study are to investigate the effects of pelvic stabilization training using transabdominal sonography-guided biofeedback in postpartum women with PPGP. A total of 50 postpartum PPGP women will be randomized into one of the two groups: (1) biofeedback group, (2) exercise group, (3) control group, and (4) health group. Subjects in the biofeedback group and exercise group will perform the same exercise training for 8 weeks except the subjects in the biofeedback group will receive transabdominal sonography-guided biofeedback of bladder movement for the first 4 weeks. The outcome assessment will include the muscle thickness of abdominal muscle and pelvic floor muscle control, functional performance of ASLR fatigue task, timed up and go and fast walking, pelvic girdle questionnaire (PGQ), and numeric rating scale (NRS). It is anticipated that the biofeedback group will have more improvements that the exercise group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan
        • National Cheng Kung University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • postpartum : ≥ 3 months
  • pregnancy-related pelvic pain
  • pain location is located between posterior iliac crest and gluteal fold
  • Clinical screening test for pelvic pain: ASLR : positive and SI joint ≥ 2 (+ symphysis ≥ 1)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lumbar or pelvic surgery
  • lother causes of pelvic pain (such as fractures)
  • lRadiculopathy
  • lother health problems, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, rheumatism , etc
  • ldaily activities limited , unable to complete the experiment
  • lcommunication disorders
  • lmental disorder
  • lpregnancy
  • lhave been trained in stable muscle strength in the past.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Transabdominal Sonography-guided Biofeedback group
pelvic floor muscle training with transabdominal sonography-guided Biofeedback
isolated pelvic floor muscles training was emphasized, consisting of both quick and sustained contractions.
incorporated the contraction of PFMs with other spinal or extremity muscles
educational session includes pelvic anatomy, mechanism of and risk factors for PPGP, and proper posture or body mechanism
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Exercise group
pelvic floor muscle training
isolated pelvic floor muscles training was emphasized, consisting of both quick and sustained contractions.
incorporated the contraction of PFMs with other spinal or extremity muscles
educational session includes pelvic anatomy, mechanism of and risk factors for PPGP, and proper posture or body mechanism
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control group
pelvic girdle education
educational session includes pelvic anatomy, mechanism of and risk factors for PPGP, and proper posture or body mechanism

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity measure of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a self-reported instrument assessing average pain intensity in currently. Possible score range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
pain intensity measure of pelvic girdle questionnaire(PGQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
pelvic girdle questionnaire(PGQ) is a self-reported instrument assessing pelvic girdle pain intensity in currently. Questionnaire consisting of 20 activity items and 5 symptom items on a 4-point response scale. Possible score range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional performance of ASLR fatigue task
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Participants lifted the heel of the test leg to 20 cm for as long as possible. Participants were required to maintain pressure in the cuff beneath their back as close to 40 mm Hg as possible. Visual feedback of cuff pressure was provided throughout the task, but no instruction was given on how to affect cuff pressure. Task failure was defi ned as an inability to maintain heel height 10 cm or more off the plinth and/or a change in cuff pressure of 20 mm Hg or more.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
functional performance of timed up and go test
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Test instructions were given in Norwegian. Translated into English, the instructions were as follows: 'After "ready, set, go" stand up, walk as fast as you can until you cross the white line, turn around, and walk back to the chair and sit down again'. The white line was positioned 3m from the patient's starting position.

'After "ready, set, go" stand up, walk as fast as you can until you cross the white line, turn around, and walk back to the chair and sit down again'. The white line was positioned 3m from the patient's starting position.

Change from baseline to 8 weeks
functional performance of 6m timed walk test (fast walking)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Subjects commenced the test in standing with their toes up against the tape marker. Test instructions translated into English were as follows: 'After "ready, set, go", walk as fast as you can up to the last white line without stopping or speaking along the way'. Performances were timed (to the nearest 100th of a second) between the 2m and 8m markers and later converted into speed in metres per second.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Muscle function measures of abdominal muscle
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Untrasonography image for muscle thickness of abdominal muscle during rest and ASLR test.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Muscle function measures of pelvic floor muscle control
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 8 weeks
Untrasonography image for muscle thickness of pelvic floor muscle control at maximum contraction.
Change from baseline to 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Girdle Pain

Clinical Trials on isolated pelvic floor muscles training

Subscribe