Effects of Comprehensive Augmented and Virtual Reality in Stroke Patients

January 23, 2022 updated by: Jong Geol Do, Samsung Medical Center

Effects of Comprehensive Augmented and Virtual Reality for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in First-Ever Stroke Patients

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of augmented and virtual reality-based rehabilitation programs on improving upper extremity function in subacute stroke patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a randomized, single-blinded study, conducted at a single acute rehabilitation unit in a university hospital. In this study, the effect of augmented and virtual reality-based rehabilitation for the recovery of subacute stroke patients compared with conventional occupational therapy was evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First ever stroke
  • Onset of stroke less than 3 months
  • Sufficiently medically stable to participate in active rehabilitation
  • Mild-to-moderate upper extremity motor impairments (Brunnstrom stage for the upper extremity 2-6).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment (defined as score < 10 on the Mini-Mental State Examination)
  • Evidence of apraxia
  • Clinical history of neglect
  • Previous upper extremity hemiplegia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation
This group underwent augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation for 60 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 weeks.

This group underwent augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation with 4 different systems.

The RAPAEL Smart Glove® is a wearable sensory system that contains a single 9-axis movement and position sensor with 3 acceleration channels, 3 angular rate channels, and 3 magnetic field channels that measures wrist movements, and 5 bending sensors that measure finger movements. The RAPAEL Smart Board® is a rehabilitation system used to improve arm function by practicing gravity-compensated movements. The RehabMaster® is a game-based Kinect sensor AR rehabilitation system which uses a 3D camera to digitize patient movements and quickly analyze their range of motion, speed, motion angle, and movement cycles. rehabilitation exercise using games to encourage active arm and trunk movements and promote successful rehabilitation. The COG-Trainer® is a VR system that uses a training device synchronized with the screen through simulation.

Active Comparator: Conventional occupational therapy
This group underwent conventional occutational therapy for 60 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 weeks.
The group underwent standard ocupational therapy, such as range of motion and strengthening exercises for the affected upper extremity, table-top activities, and training for activities of daily living.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity score
Time Frame: Baseline
range (0-126), higher scores mean a better motor function
Baseline
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity score
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
range (0-126), higher scores mean a better motor function
2 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Box and Block Test
Time Frame: Baseline
higher scores mean a worse motor function
Baseline
Box and Block Test
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
higher scores mean a worse motor function
2 weeks after intervention
Modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: Baseline
range (0-100), higher scores mean a better activity of daily living
Baseline
Modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
range (0-100), higher scores mean a better activity of daily living
2 weeks after intervention
Motor Activity Log of Amount of Use and Quality of Movement
Time Frame: Baseline
range (0-150), higher scores mean a better activity of daily living
Baseline
Motor Activity Log of Amount of Use and Quality of Movement
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
range (0-150), higher scores mean a better activity of daily living
2 weeks after intervention
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
range (0-100), higher scores mean a better quality of life
Baseline
EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
range (0-100), higher scores mean a better quality of life
2 weeks after intervention
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
range (0-56), higher scores mean a better balance function
Baseline
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
range (0-56), higher scores mean a better balance function
2 weeks after intervention
Grip strength (kg)
Time Frame: Baseline
higher scores mean a better hand function
Baseline
Grip strength (kg)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
higher scores mean a better hand function
2 weeks after intervention
Hand response reaction time
Time Frame: Baseline
higher scores mean a worse hand function
Baseline
Hand response reaction time
Time Frame: 2 weeks after intervention
higher scores mean a worse hand function
2 weeks after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Augmented reality and virtual reality rehabilitation

Subscribe