Virtual Mirror Therapy for Relief of Chronic Phantom Limb Pain

May 7, 2024 updated by: Conley Carr, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The purpose of this project is to further investigate the use of Virtual Mirror therapy for alleviating symptoms of chronic phantom limb pain. This initial pilot study will inform a fully powered randomized control trial which will include both upper and lower extremity amputees

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ten unilateral upper extremity amputees suffering from chronic phantom limb pain > 1 yr will be recruited from a hospital based outpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Amputee Clinic. There will be no control group and all 10 subjects will be offered the use of a Virtual Reality headset therapy game (developed in Unreal Engine using Oculus Quest 2 SDK). Fiducial markers will be placed on the residual limb for tracking via front facing cameras on the Oculus Quest 2 and the sound limb movements will be duplicated (flipped for chirality) and mapped onto the residual limb to provide the appearance of their residual limb. The software will direct the subjects through a series of guided movements, stretches, and visualization exercises which last a total of 15 minutes. Afterwards the subjects will be given 5 minutes of unstructured time in the program to perform any of exercises or movements they desire in order to attempt to relieve their phantom limb pain. Subjects will aim for 1 session per week for a total of 6 weeks. Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. Prior to the first session as well as at 6 weeks and 12 weeks subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Pain Disability

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • The University of Alabama at Birmingahm

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of unilateral upper extremity amputation with continued intermittent or persistent phantom limb pain symptoms > 1 yr after amputation, pain must be >=4 of 10 on the VAS at least intermittently (i.e. can have no pain at times but they must at least have 4/10 intensity of pain when pain does occur).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled bipolar/schizophrenia, active psychosis, uncontrolled seizure disorder, history of severe simulator sickness, active nausea/vomiting, uncontrolled vertigo, bilateral blindness, any facial wounds around the cheeks nose or eyes that may interfere with headset, conjunctivitis, zoster ophthalmicus, immunodeficiency (uncontrolled HIV, immuno-suppressive medications, chemotherapy, etc), severe claustrophobia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Unilateral upper extremity amputees
Unilateral upper extremity amputees suffering from chronic phantom limb pain > 1 yr will be recruited from a hospital based outpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Amputee Clinic at UAB.
Subjects will be offered the use of a Virtual Reality headset therapy game. Fiducial markers will be placed on the residual limb for tracking via front facing cameras on the Oculus Quest 2 and the sound limb movements will be duplicated (flipped for chirality) and mapped onto the residual limb to provide the appearance of their residual limb. The software will direct the subjects through a series of guided movements, stretches, and visualization exercises which last a total of 15 minutes. Afterwards the subjects will be given 5 minutes of unstructured time in the program to perform any of exercises or movements they desire in order to attempt to relieve their phantom limb pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline Numeric Rating Scale of Chronic Phantom Limb Pain
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0)
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Baseline to use as comparison to each study session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well.
Baseline (Week 0)
Change from Baseline Numeric Rating Scale at Session1
Time Frame: Week 1 - Week 52
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well as if the pain is improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline (prior to study).
Week 1 - Week 52
Change from Baseline Numeric Rating Scale at Session 2
Time Frame: Week 2 - Week 52
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well as if the pain is improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline (prior to study).
Week 2 - Week 52
Change from Baseline Numeric Rating Scale at Session 3
Time Frame: Week 3 - Week 52
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well as if the pain is improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline (prior to study).
Week 3 - Week 52
Change from Baseline Numeric Rating Scale at Session 4
Time Frame: Week 4 - Week 52
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well as if the pain is improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline (prior to study).
Week 4 - Week 52
Change from Baseline Numeric Rating Scale at Session 5
Time Frame: Week 5 - Week 52
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well as if the pain is improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline (prior to study).
Week 5 - Week 52
Change from Baseline Numeric Rating Scale at Session 6
Time Frame: Week 6 - Week 52
Subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) prior to and after each session. If pain is intermittent or constant will be noted and if episodic/intermittent a frequency for how often the pain occurs will be obtained as well as if the pain is improved, unchanged, or worsened compared to baseline (prior to study).
Week 6 - Week 52
Baseline Pain Disability Questionnaire of Chronic Phantom Limb Pain
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0)
Prior to the first session as well as at 6 weeks and 12 weeks subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ).
Baseline (Week 0)
Change from Baseline Pain Disability Questionnaire at Week 6
Time Frame: 6 weeks after final session (Session 6)
Prior to the first session as well as at 6 weeks and 12 weeks subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ).
6 weeks after final session (Session 6)
Change from Baseline Pain Disability Questionnaire at Week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks after final session (Session 6)
Prior to the first session as well as at 6 weeks and 12 weeks subjects will rate their phantom limb pain symptoms on the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ).
12 weeks after final session (Session 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session1
Time Frame: Week 1 - Week 52
Free-text section where participants can further describe any changes regarding their pain (change in quality etc).
Week 1 - Week 52
Change in Quality from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session 2
Time Frame: Week 2 - Week 52
Free-text section where participants can further describe any changes regarding their pain (change in quality etc).
Week 2 - Week 52
Change in Quality from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session 3
Time Frame: Week 3 - Week 52
Free-text section where participants can further describe any changes regarding their pain (change in quality etc).
Week 3 - Week 52
Change in Quality from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session 4
Time Frame: Week 4 - Week 52
Free-text section where participants can further describe any changes regarding their pain (change in quality etc).
Week 4 - Week 52
Change in Quality from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session 5
Time Frame: Week 5 - Week 52
Free-text section where participants can further describe any changes regarding their pain (change in quality etc).
Week 5 - Week 52
Change in Quality from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session 6
Time Frame: Week 6 - Week 52
Free-text section where participants can further describe any changes regarding their pain (change in quality etc).
Week 6 - Week 52
Impressions of change from Baseline Chronic Phantom Limb Pain at Session 6
Time Frame: Week 6 - Week 52
At the end of 6 sessions of Virtual Mirror Therapy subjects will be given the opportunity to submit opinions/comments regarding their impressions of the sessions.
Week 6 - Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Conley Carr, MD, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Phantom Limb Pain

Clinical Trials on Virtual Mirror Therapy

Subscribe