MotIoN aDaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for MSA (MINDS)

April 9, 2024 updated by: University of Oxford
Patients routinely undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment of symptoms related to neurodegenerative conditions, most commonly Parkinson's disease. In the Investigator's experience, and published evidence shows, that stimulation has effects on the autonomic nervous system. In patients undergoing therapeutic DBS for a particular subtype of Parkinsonism (Multiple System Atrophy), the effects on autonomic parameters such as blood pressure and bladder symptoms has been shown to be improved by the investigators (unpublished data). In this current study, the investigators plan to use a novel technique of adaptive DBS in order to provide stimulation dependent on patient physiological or positional factors. This is with the aim of making stimulation more responsive and patient-specific.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aim and patient group:

Multiple System Atrophy is a form of Parkinsonism and is a neurodegenerative condition that is characterized by gait and autonomic failure. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of aDBS of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus (PPN) on autonomic and gait symptoms in a group of 5 patients with MSA. Patients will enter our routine selection process but patients in the study will be selected for predominantly autonomic symptoms as per the inclusion criteria below. The aim is to test whether or not PPN aDBS improves quality of life, and has an effect on a variety of measurable autonomic parameters in this subset of patients. Secondary aims are to assess the safety of DBS in MSA, and to look at the structural projections and effects on brain networks associated with stimulation.

Background:

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a routine treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). In Oxford, around 80 DBS operations per year are performed, and approximately two thirds of these are in patients with PD. Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a 'Parkinsonian' condition similar to PD and is a progressive, incurable, neurodegenerative condition characterized by a combination of Parkinsonism, ataxia, and autonomic failure. Any one of these three features may predominate, making diagnosis difficult; however, virtually all patients have autonomic dysfunction. Indeed, autonomic dysfunction is the presenting feature in half of patients that have Parkinsonism or ataxia predominant MSA. The motor manifestations such as gait problems, ataxia, and postural abnormalities are very similar to those encountered by patients with Parkinson's disease, though unfortunately are usually less responsive to dopamine agonists and so can be more disabling. Patients tend to progress more quickly, often confined to a wheelchair within 3-5 years of diagnosis, and death is usually within a decade.

Whilst DBS has sometimes been performed for the treatment of MSA, including in Oxford , the primary outcome measure is usually the motor outcome, despite the fact that the autonomic symptoms are probably the predominant factor in causing a reduced quality of life. This is because DBS is traditionally used to control motor symptoms and the exploration of its effects on autonomic function are relatively new, and pioneered by the investigators.

The most common complaints caused by autonomic dysfunction in MSA are related to orthostatic hypotension and neurogenic bladder. The former causes dizziness, fatigue and, when a severe fall in BP occurs on standing, can lead to collapse. This may be, at least in part, a cause for the numerous falls that these patients suffer. Part of the aim of this study is to look at orthostatic BP changes with and without stimulation and see whether these are improved by DBS. This may correlate with a reduction in falls, although this study is unlikely to be powered to answer this specific question. Other 'autonomic' problems include bladder dysfunction, sleep disorders, exercise intolerance and problems with thermoregulation and sweating. These will be captured using questionnaires.

Regarding the target used for DBS, a well-established target to improve gait and postural abnormalities in PD is the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). It has been demonstrated that the PPN is also a brain area that, when stimulated, improves bladder function in these patients. It has also been shown that PPN stimulation reduces postural fall in BP in a group of PD patients treated primarily for gait and postural problems. Whilst these studies provide a rationale for looking at similar parameters in MSA patients, this study aims to answer the question as to whether it will work for these symptoms in MSA, in addition to the motor symptoms routinely treated.

The investigators have already shown in 5 patients with MSA that these symptoms are improved with PPN DBS. The difference in this trial is the usage of a new DBS device. This is a novel device where stimulation parameters can be changed in response to changes in the patient's position, activity, or physiological parameters.

Usage of adaptive stimulation:

The investigators intend to study the usage of motion-based control of stimulation. In the current trial, the main aim is to assess the effects of DBS on gait, sleep, and blood pressure control.

In previous studies, the investigators have noted that while standing, blood pressure is increased with stimulation, as is lying blood pressure. Supine hypertension may increase the stroke risk for these patients. Furthermore, the best improvement in gait is seen with a slightly different stimulation waveform.

In order to correct for this, the investigators propose to introduce motion-based adaptive stimulation which would involve the use of an accelerometer in changing between different stimulation parameters depending on the patient's position - so delivering a different waveform for lying and standing.

Justification/importance:

A trial of DBS to assess the effect on autonomic symptomatology of MSA has never been performed. We aim to combine a five patient clinical pilot study of DBS for MSA with an investigation of the neural circuitry underpinning autonomic control.

This translational strategy is likely to lead to a larger efficacy study of DBS for MSA as well as revolutionizing neural-based treatments in other autonomic disorders such as orthostatic hypotension and pure autonomic failure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Recruiting
        • John Radcliffe Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

53 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of MSA with disabling autonomic symptoms
  • >6/12 in the autonomic subsection (Q9-12) of the UMSAR scale
  • Patient willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study.
  • Male or female aged 55 years or over
  • Able to walk (to perform gait analysis)
  • Have an anticipated prognosis > 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female of child-bearing age
  • The patient is unwilling to participate or unable to give informed consent.
  • The patient has been deemed unfit for stimulator insertion by their healthcare team i.e. surgical contraindications to DBS:
  • Bleeding or coagulation disorder
  • Not fit for general anaesthetic
  • Unable to deal with implanted DBS system (turn on and off and recharging where applicable, although it is acceptable if a carer can do this)
  • Untreated anxiety or depression
  • Unable to undergo preoperative MRI (e.g. metal implants)
  • Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Deep brain stimulation
All patients will undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation with results compared before and after stimulation
Electrical pulses from implanted generator that adapts to patient activity and/or physiology

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life before and after DBS measured by EuroQol-5 domains
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
EQ-5D before and after DBS. Each domain score 1-5, higher is worse.
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Change in freezing of gait before and after DBS, measured by freezing of gait questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG) before and after DBS, Score 0-24, higher is worse.
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Change in the number of sleep arousals per night
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS using
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Change in the number of sleep arousals per night
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Cardiovascular symptoms before and after DBS (continuous blood pressure)
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure before and after DBS
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Cardiovascular symptoms before and after DBS (change in postural blood pressure)
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by tilt table blood pressure before and after DBS
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Change of power in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by change in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Change of power in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by change in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Change of power in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Measured by change in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events
Time Frame: Throughout study up to 6 months
Documentation of adverse events from intervention
Throughout study up to 6 months
Measurement of Falls frequency
Time Frame: Throughout study up to 3 months
Falls diary
Throughout study up to 3 months
Frequency and volume of bladder voiding before and after stimulation
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
British association of urological surgeons bladder diary
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Autonomic function before and after stimulation measured by autonomic symptom profile
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Autonomic symptom profile questionnaire. Higher score is worse. Multiple sections, and composite score possible.
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Carer Burden before and after stimulation measured by Zarit Burden interview
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Zarit Burden interview Carer Burden Questionnaire. Score 0-88, higher is worse.
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
MSA disease severity score before and after stimulation
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Unified MSA Rating Scale before and after stimulation. Scores 0-48 pt1, 0-56 pt2; higher is worse.
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Gait Analysis before and after stimulation using gaitrite mat to measure gait and step velocity and symmetry
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation
Gait parameters testing using Gaitrite mat
Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropsychological Outcome before and after stimulation
Time Frame: Pre-operative and at 6 months after stimulation
Structured interview and standard Neuropsychological Testing (Memory, Attention, Language, Mood, visuospatial function and cognition
Pre-operative and at 6 months after stimulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided We are recruiting only 5 patients, so sharing IPD even anonymised, may be identifiable. Decision will be taken when this can be definitively elucidated.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MSA - Multiple System Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Deep brain stimulation

3
Subscribe