- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05220540
Retrospective Analysis of Balloon Expandable Covered Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery (BEST-CFA)
November 20, 2023 updated by: Csaba Csobay-Novák MD PhD, Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of balloon expandable covered stenting of access complications, stenoses or pseudoaneurysms of the common femoral access.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
In the past decades, there has been a paradigm shift in the field of vascular surgery, with endovascular interventions replacing traditional open surgical procedures on an increasing scale.
Most of these interventions are performed via the femoral artery.
Even with modern percutaneous vascular closure devices, interventional laboratories report a high incidence of vascular complications, most commonly bleeding.
Interventional procedures are gaining ground as an alternative to surgery.
Having regard to the fact that femoral arteries are in constant motion due to their location and are subject to intense bending forces, the long-term durability of stents has been questioned in the absence of long-term follow-up data.
There is currently no broad consensus on the strategy of care for vascular complications, and overall the decision is left to the discretion of the interventionalist, largely determined by the available local resources and infrastructure.
The use of covered stents is an option for endovascular treatment of the complications: the self expanding nitinol framed stent graft with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coating and the cobalt-chrome framed, also PTFE coated balloon expandable stent.
The main aim of this research is to analyse the short- and long-term outcome of these alternatives.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
24
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1122
- Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1096
- Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center
-
-
Csongrád-Csanád
-
Szeged, Csongrád-Csanád, Hungary, 6725
- University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Center, Second Department of Medicine and Cardiology Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients undergoing either transcathether aortic valve repair (TAVR), endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) via percutaneous femoral access resulting in access site complication, or patients who undergo endovascular therapy of common femoral artery disease, managed by balloon-expandable covered stent(s).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- over 18 years of age
- intervention from the left or right common femoral artery
- access complication treated by balloon expandable covered stent(s) or common femoral artery disease treated by balloon-expandable covered stent(s)
Exclusion criteria:
- none
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary patency rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of patent common femoral arteries at one year
|
1 year
|
|
Reintervention rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of reinterventions on the treated vessels
|
1 year
|
|
Amputation rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of amputations at the side of the treated common femoral artery
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Restenosis rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of significant (peak systolic velocity ratio > 2,4) restenoses found at one year
|
1 year
|
|
Walking disturbance rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of any new onset walking impairment
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Csaba Csobay-Novák, MD, PhD, Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, Rao V, Bianchi C, Hashemi H, Jones P, Bacharach JM. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.101. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
- Cox T, Blair L, Huntington C, Lincourt A, Sing R, Heniford BT. Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures. Surg Technol Int. 2015 Nov;27:32-44.
- Heger T, Strauss S, Blessing E, Andrassy M, Erbel C, Muller OJ, Chorianopoulos E, Pleger S, Leuschner F, Korosoglou G, Bekeredjian R, Katus HA, Vogel B. Short and long-term results after endovascular management of vascular complications during transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Acta Cardiol. 2017 Aug;72(4):474-482. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1335455. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
- Barbash IM, Barbanti M, Webb J, Molina-Martin De Nicolas J, Abramowitz Y, Latib A, Nguyen C, Deuschl F, Segev A, Sideris K, Buccheri S, Simonato M, Rosa FD, Tamburino C, Jilaihawi H, Miyazaki T, Himbert D, Schofer N, Guetta V, Bleiziffer S, Tchetche D, Imme S, Makkar RR, Vahanian A, Treede H, Lange R, Colombo A, Dvir D. Comparison of vascular closure devices for access site closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3370-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv417. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
- Schwartz BG, Burstein S, Economides C, Kloner RA, Shavelle DM, Mayeda GS. Review of vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):599-607.
- Sekhar A, Sutton BS, Raheja P, Mohsen A, Anggelis E, Anggelis CN, Keith MC, Dawn B, Straton S, Flaherty MP. Femoral arterial closure using ProGlide(R) is more efficacious and cost-effective when ambulating early following cardiac catheterization. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2016 Oct 11;13:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.09.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
- Seeger J, Gonska B, Rodewald C, Rottbauer W, Wohrle J. Impact of suture mediated femoral access site closure with the Prostar XL compared to the ProGlide system on outcome in transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.193. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
- Durmus G, Belen E, Bayyigit A, Can MM. Comparison of Complication and Success Rates of ProGlide Closure Device in Patients Undergoing TAVI and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 9;2018:2687862. doi: 10.1155/2018/2687862. eCollection 2018.
- Franco CD, Goldsmith J, Veith FJ, Calligaro KD, Gupta SK, Wengerter KR. Management of arterial injuries produced by percutaneous femoral procedures. Surgery. 1993 Apr;113(4):419-25.
- Tsetis D. Endovascular treatment of complications of femoral arterial access. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):457-68. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9820-3. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
August 31, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
February 2, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 21, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 20, 2023
Last Verified
February 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- AFC2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Vascular Complications
-
University Hospital, RouenNot yet recruitingVascular ComplicationsFrance
-
University Paul Sabatier of ToulouseRecruitingVascular ComplicationsFrance
-
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical CenterCompletedVascular ComplicationsKorea, Republic of
-
Shanghai 10th People's HospitalNot yet recruitingVascular Access ComplicationsChina
-
North Texas Veterans Healthcare SystemTerminated
-
C. R. BardCompletedVascular Access ComplicationsUnited States
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruitingVascular Access Device ComplicationsSouth Korea
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompletedVascular Access Device ComplicationsUnited States
-
Zhongda HospitalTerumo Medical CorporationRecruiting
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingSupracondylar Humerus Fracture | Vascular ComplicationsEgypt